I am running 1.0 on windows.
I have tried to enable ldap authentication.
I have done
easy_install python_ldap
but get an error "No module named crypt"
It looks like reviewboard/accounts/backends.py attempts to import
crypt
Where do I get a windows version of this from?
--~--~-~--~
ond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, neil wrote:
>
> > I am running 1.0 on windows.
> > I have tried to enable ldap authentication.
>
> > I ha
ble in unix versions of python. Perhaps no one has
> tried using LDAP on a Windows install. This module isn't needed for
> for LDAP, so you could try removing the import from backends.py to
> verify whether you can set up LDAP authentication.
>
> Dan
>
> On Jul 28, 6:43 p
ond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:40 PM, neil wrote:
>
> > Great thanks.
> > Commented out
> > import crypt
> > in
> > reviewboard/accounts/ba
packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3.1-py2.5.egg/
reviewboard/scmtools/git.py", line 179, in __init__
raise ImportError
ImportError
Git is installed on the server and working.
Any ideas?
Neil
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
nly reason we grant some users
these permissions is so they can tidy up reviews when people have left, or
add additional groups/users the poster missed. Most of the time they won't
need to be editing the review.
Cheers,
Neil.
On Wednesday, 25 January 2023 at 21:48:38 UTC Christian Hammo
ity with development of
> this feature. Where do we get started? Has anyone else in the
> community started any work at the design or implementation level?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
>
>
> --Jeff
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
I was trying to install RBTools on my Python 2.3.4 system and got the
message about the missing cookielib import. Is it possible to support
the pre-2.4 libraries of ClientCookie like is documented at
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/302930/ ? I'm not sure if there
are any other requirements for
I started looking around and the closest thing I see is
http://reviewboard.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-commit.
Is there another place that the RBTools source is, or is that it?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
It's over before it began. Replacing cookielib is one thing, but going
back and replacing subprocess is another.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email t
git is in /usr/bin which I would assume is correct.
N
On 28 Sep 2009, at 12:11, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53, Neil wrote:
>> I've just installed ReviewBoard on a plain Hardy install, and have
>> created a repository pointed at GitHub
Does anyone have any other ideas? I'm trying a variety of things but not
getting anywhere with this...
TIA
Neil
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Neil Middleton wrote:
> git is in /usr/bin which I would assume is correct.
>
> N
>
>
> On 28 Sep 2009, at 12:11, Thilo
lation/development-releases/
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Neil Middleton
> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have an
Yeah, my team would really benefit from this as well. Let me know if you
want any contribution help.
Neil
On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 12:49:24 PM UTC-5, Geoffrey wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have used Review Board at my previous employer with great success and it
> was real
just install review board on our local server (Windows server 2008) and
noticed, when adding a repository - the only options available are for the
team foundation.
There is no option to support GIT, SVN etc as per the old version.
Am I missing sometihng?
many thanks, Neil
advice and get back with the findings.
thanks Neil
On Sunday, 15 October 2017 15:57:24 UTC+1, Neil Beresford wrote:
>
> just install review board on our local server (Windows server 2008) and
> noticed, when adding a repository - the only options available are for the
> team foundat
hanks, Neil
On Sunday, 15 October 2017 15:57:24 UTC+1, Neil Beresford wrote:
>
> just install review board on our local server (Windows server 2008) and
> noticed, when adding a repository - the only options available are for the
> team foundation.
>
> There is no option to
I'm trying to set up ReviewBoard (1.6.11, on Scientific Linux 6), and am
trying to post a diff to a review from Subversion (RBTools 0.4.2), where
the diff contains a new file being added.
It's failing with an error which implies RB is trying to fetch an old
(non-existent) version of the file to
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 10:33:21 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> How did you generate/upload the diff? It looks like the base path was set
> incorrectly. If you use post-review, this should be taken care of for you.
>
Yes, I ran post-review. The latest version of that is now printing the
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 21:13:48 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> That's the wrong humanize.
> Your Djblets wasn't updated along with Review Board, which is the problem.
> You need to update that package too.
>
Not sure I follow; is that ReviewBoard release tied to a specific version
o
On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 21:31:37 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Yes, each ReviewBoard hardcodes a required version of Djblets. See
> setup.py for the dependency list.
> The latest 1.6.x release introduced support for SVN properties, so I
> suspect you'll have more luck when that rele
I've installed RB twice, in 2 separate subdirectories, each using a
separate run of rb-site. One is in /local/reviews, and a test/debug one is
in /local/reviews-test. I have set up an Apache config. to set up each of
these as separate sub-URLs on the same server (no virtual servers).
I am fin
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Justin O'Doherty wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, I didn't know of the other hosting options until
> you posted them.
>
> I have resolved the 403 issue on my current installation. I had to add the
> following line to the httpd-vhosts.conf
>
> "Require all granted
23 matches
Mail list logo
