Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Daniel Wong

oooh. Thanks for explaining!

On Jul 14, 5:20 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> The link you were looking at has to do with a Review Board site instance. A
> server can host several sites, which are maintained by rb-site. However, a
> site is *not* the software. The software has to be installed and upgraded
> separately, which is what the page I linked to covers. Once the software is
> upgraded, you can then upgrade the sites (which would until then be using
> parts of the older version instead of the newer one).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:
>
> > Thanks Christian. Can you explain what my link is describing and how
> > that's different from yours?
>
> > On Jul 14, 3:27 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > > The docs you want to start with are:
>
> > >http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/upgrad...
>
> > > Christian
>
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Wong 
> > wrote:
>
> > > > I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:
>
> >http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/
>
> > > > Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
> > > > I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > > > > Did you run:
>
> > > > > easy_install -U ReviewBoard
>
> > > > > ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just
> > > > upgrades
> > > > > the site for the new version.
>
> > > > > Christian
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> > > > > > upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
>
> > > > > > $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > > > Updating database
> > > > > > Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from
> > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> > > > > > packages/Re
> > > > > > viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> > > > > > Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> > > > > > No evolution required.
>
> > > > > > I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem
> > to
> > > > > > help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit
> > the
> > > > > > site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> > > > > > 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> > > > > > site upgrade?
>
> > > > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > > > Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Christian Hammond
The link you were looking at has to do with a Review Board site instance. A
server can host several sites, which are maintained by rb-site. However, a
site is *not* the software. The software has to be installed and upgraded
separately, which is what the page I linked to covers. Once the software is
upgraded, you can then upgrade the sites (which would until then be using
parts of the older version instead of the newer one).

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:

>
> Thanks Christian. Can you explain what my link is describing and how
> that's different from yours?
>
> On Jul 14, 3:27 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > The docs you want to start with are:
> >
> > http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/upgrad...
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Wong 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:
> >
> > >
> http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/
> >
> > > Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
> > > I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.
> >
> > > On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > > > Did you run:
> >
> > > > easy_install -U ReviewBoard
> >
> > > > ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just
> > > upgrades
> > > > the site for the new version.
> >
> > > > Christian
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
> >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong 
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > > I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> > > > > upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
> >
> > > > > $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > > Updating database
> > > > > Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from
> '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> > > > > packages/Re
> > > > > viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> > > > > Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> > > > > No evolution required.
> >
> > > > > I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem
> to
> > > > > help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit
> the
> > > > > site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> > > > > 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> > > > > site upgrade?
> >
> > > > > Thanks,
> >
> > > > > Daniel
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Daniel Wong

Thanks Christian. Can you explain what my link is describing and how
that's different from yours?

On Jul 14, 3:27 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> The docs you want to start with are:
>
> http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/upgrad...
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:
>
> > I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:
>
> >http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/
>
> > Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
> > I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.
>
> > On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > > Did you run:
>
> > > easy_install -U ReviewBoard
>
> > > ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just
> > upgrades
> > > the site for the new version.
>
> > > Christian
>
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong 
> > wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> > > > upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
>
> > > > $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > Updating database
> > > > Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> > > > packages/Re
> > > > viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> > > > Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> > > > No evolution required.
>
> > > > I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
> > > > help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit the
> > > > site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> > > > 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> > > > site upgrade?
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Christian Hammond
The docs you want to start with are:

http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/upgrading/

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:

>
> I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:
>
> http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/
>
> Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
> I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.
>
> On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> > Did you run:
> >
> > easy_install -U ReviewBoard
> >
> > ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just
> upgrades
> > the site for the new version.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> > > upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
> >
> > > $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > Updating database
> > > Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> > > packages/Re
> > > viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> > > Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> > > No evolution required.
> >
> > > I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
> > > help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit the
> > > site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> > > 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> > > site upgrade?
> >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > > Daniel
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Daniel Wong

I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:

http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/

Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.

On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Did you run:
>
> easy_install -U ReviewBoard
>
> ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just upgrades
> the site for the new version.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> > upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
>
> > $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > Rebuilding directory structure
> > Updating database
> > Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> > packages/Re
> > viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> > Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> > No evolution required.
>
> > I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
> > help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit the
> > site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> > 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> > site upgrade?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: "No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Christian Hammond
Did you run:

easy_install -U ReviewBoard

? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just upgrades
the site for the new version.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong  wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
> upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:
>
> $ sudo rb-site upgrade .
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database
> Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
> packages/Re
> viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
> Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
> No evolution required.
>
> I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
> help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit the
> site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
> 1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
> site upgrade?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



"No evolution required."

2009-07-14 Thread Daniel Wong

Hi,

I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do "sudo rb-site
upgrade ", nothing seems to happen:

$ sudo rb-site upgrade .
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database
Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
packages/Re
viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
No evolution required.

I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
help, because "beta" still appears next to the logo when I visit the
site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
site upgrade?

Thanks,

Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---