Re: Marking a review as currently being reviewed
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 21:47, David Trowbridge wrote: > There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary > to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when > more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are > caught early on. I can second this. From my experience with a medium-sized RB installation it is the reviews involving more than a single reviewer, which end up finding most bugs. Regards, Thilo -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Marking a review as currently being reviewed
There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are caught early on. -David On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, mnem wrote: > Hi, > > This is probably peculiar to the way we're using ReviewBoard here, but > I was wondering if anyone has a similar issues (and what their > solutions are). > > For our review process, new reviews target a group of reviewers, and > then the first free reviewer picks up the review and starts going > through it. The problem with this approach, however, is that it's > possible to accidentally have 2 people looking at the same review if > neither of them mention what review they are working on. > > Has anyone come up with a good solution for this? The main option that > comes to mind is that a reviewer claims a review by adding a comment > to the review and publishes it. > > Are there better ways to do it? > > > Dave > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Marking a review as currently being reviewed
Hi, This is probably peculiar to the way we're using ReviewBoard here, but I was wondering if anyone has a similar issues (and what their solutions are). For our review process, new reviews target a group of reviewers, and then the first free reviewer picks up the review and starts going through it. The problem with this approach, however, is that it's possible to accidentally have 2 people looking at the same review if neither of them mention what review they are working on. Has anyone come up with a good solution for this? The main option that comes to mind is that a reviewer claims a review by adding a comment to the review and publishes it. Are there better ways to do it? Dave -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
