On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Chris Toomey
wrote:
> Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post-
> review?
We've been using post-review with Mercurial for almost 2 years. What
makes you think that it's not supported?
--
Want to help the Review Board
On Friday 15 July 2011 07:45:22 pm Chris Toomey wrote:
> Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post-
> review? We've been using
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ReviewboardExtension which is pretty good
> but doesn't support some of the feature
Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post-
review? We've been using http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ReviewboardExtension
which is pretty good but doesn't support some of the features of post-
review like passing in a diff file. Plus it'd be better in gener
Hi,
Does the post-review tool support Mercurial or must one use the
separate Mercurial reviewboard extension (http://mercurial.selenic.com/
wiki/ReviewboardExtension)?
If the former, can you please give examples of 1) posting a review of
uncommitted files in the working directory, and 2) posting