Christian Hammond wrote:
> ...I also would like an rbapi (or something) package for all the
> server communication code. This would be separate from RBTools, but
> RBTools would use it. post-review would be greatly simplified by these
> two changes.
That would be awesome, we've had a couple of
Yep, sounds good to me.
I'm out of town and am not as available as I normally am, so it might still
be a few days before I start reviewing code, but the proposal is good.
I have some further thoughts for making post-review more extensible, but I'd
need the time to do it properly. What I'd like to
Ritesh Nadhani wrote:
> For one, I would be interested. We use Bazaar and and have been slowly
> trying to intergrate ReviewBoard in our system. I looked into the
> post-review and it does not seem to support Bazaar. I have already
> extended it using the Mercurial example and override two or thre
For one, I would be interested. We use Bazaar and and have been slowly
trying to intergrate ReviewBoard in our system. I looked into the
post-review and it does not seem to support Bazaar. I have already
extended it using the Mercurial example and override two or three
methods that the Mercurial c
