Re: RBTools 0.2 RC 1 released
There are always more things that can be fixed or added, but at some point we have to make the decision to put out a release. It means the things that have been in development the past several months can finally make it to a wider audience. It doesn't mean that older patches won't make it in after the release, though. ClearCase is difficult for us to support and test because we don't have access to a server we can test against. It's a commercial product and Review Board fights to stay out of the red every year as it is, financially, as we rely on donations to keep the project funded. So we rely on third parties to test and enhance our ClearCase support. As for this particular patch, it was never posted to http://reviews.reviewboard.org, which is where we require all patches to go. Because of that, it was missed. Hopefully we'll get it properly reviewed and in before the final 0.2. If not, there are always point releases. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote: > And what with issues like this: > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1423? > They are old and patches for work well but no one add it to this > release. > > On Feb 14, 9:06 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We just released RBTools 0.2 RC 1. Those who have been following the > > nightlies know what to expect, but for those still using 0.2 Beta 2, > there's > > a number of good fixes, feature additions and compatibility improvements > in > > this release. > > > > This release will be necessary soon for the Review Board nightlies. We > will > > soon be releasing 1.5 Beta 1 (formerly 1.1 Beta 1), and shortly after our > > JSON API functions will be changed to use HTTP status codes other than > HTTP > > 200 OK. This may break some older clients, including post-review. If you > > update to the 0.2 RC 1 release, though, you'll be fine when these changes > > take affect. > > > > You can read more at: > http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2010/02/13/rbtools-02-rc-1-released/ > > > > Release notes are at: > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/rbtools/0.2-rc-1/. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: RBTools 0.2 RC 1 released
"post-review has gained a new --diff-filename option for specifying a diff file to upload, instead of generating a new diff. This can be useful for automation and third party integration purposes. Passing "-" as the filename will cause post-review to read from stdin." 100 points for this option. This is what I needed! Grate feature! This is genius and making post-review extremely wide useful and elastic! Really good move. On Feb 14, 3:11 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote: > And what with issues like > this:http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1423? > They are old and patches for work well but no one add it to this > release. > > On Feb 14, 9:06 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > We just released RBTools 0.2 RC 1. Those who have been following the > > nightlies know what to expect, but for those still using 0.2 Beta 2, there's > > a number of good fixes, feature additions and compatibility improvements in > > this release. > > > This release will be necessary soon for the Review Board nightlies. We will > > soon be releasing 1.5 Beta 1 (formerly 1.1 Beta 1), and shortly after our > > JSON API functions will be changed to use HTTP status codes other than HTTP > > 200 OK. This may break some older clients, including post-review. If you > > update to the 0.2 RC 1 release, though, you'll be fine when these changes > > take affect. > > > You can read more > > at:http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2010/02/13/rbtools-02-rc-1-released/ > > > Release notes are > > at:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/rbtools/0.2-rc-1/. > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: RBTools 0.2 RC 1 released
And what with issues like this: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1423? They are old and patches for work well but no one add it to this release. On Feb 14, 9:06 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We just released RBTools 0.2 RC 1. Those who have been following the > nightlies know what to expect, but for those still using 0.2 Beta 2, there's > a number of good fixes, feature additions and compatibility improvements in > this release. > > This release will be necessary soon for the Review Board nightlies. We will > soon be releasing 1.5 Beta 1 (formerly 1.1 Beta 1), and shortly after our > JSON API functions will be changed to use HTTP status codes other than HTTP > 200 OK. This may break some older clients, including post-review. If you > update to the 0.2 RC 1 release, though, you'll be fine when these changes > take affect. > > You can read more > at:http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2010/02/13/rbtools-02-rc-1-released/ > > Release notes are > at:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/rbtools/0.2-rc-1/. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
