Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-09-01 Thread RShelley
 be difficult to implement patches to the
  .py
 Python source.  If you use the interpreted version, then you can
  apply
 the patch and things might work for you (if your environment is like
 that of user tag_98007work )

 Does that seem to sum things up OK?

 Note that I don't see any of the problems described here, but I had
  to
 do the following to get post-review to work for everyone:
 1 - Everyone has to have the following environment set: P4PORT,
  P4USER,
 P4CLIENT (NOT P4PASSWD!)
 2 - Everyone has to be running P4V when they run post-review (I
  actually
 added it as a tool to P4V so the users can right click on any
  changelist
 and hit submit to reviewboard and nobody needs to use a command
 line/shell command at all)
 With perforce 2009.2/2010.1 this works fine with no problems : the
 ticket from P4V is visible to the p4 command line (called from
 post-review) and everything's fine (this is using latest RBTools
 installed with the command easy_install -U RBTools and review board
 1.5 beta 2)

 Dana Lacoste

 -Original Message-
 From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:
  reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]

 On Behalf Of RShelley
 Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:37 PM
 To: reviewboard
 Subject: Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

 My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like
 it... Git can't come soon enough.

 Thanks for trying, I appreciate it!

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
   http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr
 oups.com
  reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com
For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr 
  oups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-29 Thread Christian Hammond
 they run post-review (I
 actually
added it as a tool to P4V so the users can right click on any
 changelist
and hit submit to reviewboard and nobody needs to use a command
line/shell command at all)
With perforce 2009.2/2010.1 this works fine with no problems : the
ticket from P4V is visible to the p4 command line (called from
post-review) and everything's fine (this is using latest RBTools
installed with the command easy_install -U RBTools and review board
1.5 beta 2)
 
Dana Lacoste
 
-Original Message-
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:
 reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
 
On Behalf Of RShelley
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:37 PM
To: reviewboard
Subject: Re: post-review and P4PASSWD
 
My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like
it... Git can't come soon enough.
 
Thanks for trying, I appreciate it!
 
   --
   Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
  http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
   Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
   -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-26 Thread RShelley
Well, I got past the P4PASSWD issue and then began getting the error
The current directory does not contain a checkout from a supported
source code repository.  After much digging, I found that the error
is actually wrong.

The PerforceClient's def_repository_info function checks for a P4
install first:

def get_repository_info(self):
if not check_install('p4 help'):
return None

data = execute([p4, info], ignore_errors=True)

If p4 cannot be found for p4 help, it returns None, and the
calling function assumes that a repository wasn't found, not that P4
couldn't be found.  As it turns out, the service running this script
is changing the PATH and post-review cannot find P4, so this check
fails.  More specifically, this is running from Hudson, and a recent
upgrade of the app changed how environment variables cascaded to child
processes, so when Hudson was upgraded, the PATH environment variables
weren't propagated, and post-review couldn't find P4.

I'd like to suggest that this if check actually throw an exception,
and not simply returns None.  Thoughts?

-Ryan

On Aug 26, 1:47 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 I think it's definitely reasonable to have a parameter for this.

 The perforce.py mentioned above would be for Review Board. With post-review,
 you'd be looking for postreview.py in rbtools.

 What I'd advise is to check out a copy of rbtools from Git and add a
 --p4-ticket parameter. It shouldn't be too hard. You can see how the other
 options work (which are defined near the bottom of the file), and make use
 of the passed option to pass the right thing to p4. I don't know about the
 ticketing stuff well enough to know what needs to be passed or set. If you
 can get it working, though, I'll commit a patch so you won't have to
 maintain a fork for too long.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com



 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:46 PM, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:
  Dana, that sums it up pretty well.  My problem is that the post-commit
  command isn't being run by the user, it's run from a script on another
  box (so it's not using P4V).  p4 login is called first to attempt to
  login and obtain a ticket and then I can use the ticket for future
  commands, but post-review doesn't accept a ticket parameter and p4
  isn't taking it from the environment.  If I could pass it to post-
  review with the rest of the p4 properties, it'd be splendid.

  On Aug 25, 3:04 pm, Dana Lacoste dlaco...@aperio.com wrote:
   So, to summarize in case someone is searching through these archives
   later:

   Perforce, when security is turned on (this is a p4d server setting) will
   have different restrictions on what can and can't be done with the
   password on the CLIENT (i.e. you can't necessarily simply set an
   environment variable and run with it.  For reference, see the P4
   SysAdmin Guide athttp://
 www.perforce.com/perforce/r10.1/manuals/p4sag/03_superuser.html#1
   081537 )

   User RShelley is running into issues with this and is having difficulty.

  http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/hasa patch (which was
   discarded) which handles this situation for user tag_98007work.

   But, if you're on Windows (or potentially in some other environments),
   you're quite possibly using a .egg/.exe compiled version of Review
   Board and therefore it may be difficult to implement patches to the .py
   Python source.  If you use the interpreted version, then you can apply
   the patch and things might work for you (if your environment is like
   that of user tag_98007work )

   Does that seem to sum things up OK?

   Note that I don't see any of the problems described here, but I had to
   do the following to get post-review to work for everyone:
   1 - Everyone has to have the following environment set: P4PORT, P4USER,
   P4CLIENT (NOT P4PASSWD!)
   2 - Everyone has to be running P4V when they run post-review (I actually
   added it as a tool to P4V so the users can right click on any changelist
   and hit submit to reviewboard and nobody needs to use a command
   line/shell command at all)
   With perforce 2009.2/2010.1 this works fine with no problems : the
   ticket from P4V is visible to the p4 command line (called from
   post-review) and everything's fine (this is using latest RBTools
   installed with the command easy_install -U RBTools and review board
   1.5 beta 2)

   Dana Lacoste

   -Original Message-
   From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]

   On Behalf Of RShelley
   Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:37 PM
   To: reviewboard
   Subject: Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

   My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like
   it... Git can't come soon enough.

   Thanks for trying, I appreciate it!

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
the changes from
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I patched the file
I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
 P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
 first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
 the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
 commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
 or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there any
 way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
 argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4
 commands?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
Where would perforce.py be located?  I've hunted around and can't find
it.

On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
 the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I patched 
 the file
 I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

 On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:



  I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
  P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
  first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
  the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
  commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
  or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there any
  way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
  argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4
  commands?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
It's located under reviewboard/scmtools.  The full path for mine is: /
usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/
reviewboard/scmtools.  Obviously this is a Unix install.  I'm not
quite sure where it would be for windows.  Does that help?


On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:
 Where would perforce.py be located?  I've hunted around and can't find
 it.

 On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:



  I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
  the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I 
  patched the file
  I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

  On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

   I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
   P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
   first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
   the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
   commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
   or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there any
   way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
   argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4
   commands?- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
I'm on Linux and I found the site-packages, but I don't have any
directories under it, just the eggs.

I also tried:   find / -name perforce.py
and that didn't come up with anything

On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's located under reviewboard/scmtools.  The full path for mine is: /
 usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/
 reviewboard/scmtools.  Obviously this is a Unix install.  I'm not
 quite sure where it would be for windows.  Does that help?

 On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:



  Where would perforce.py be located?  I've hunted around and can't find
  it.

  On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:

   I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
   the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I 
   patched the file
   I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

   On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there any
way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4
commands?- Hide quoted text -

  - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
hmm, at one point (I'm having issues and attmpting to re-install,
whole 'nother story) my ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg was a top level
directory. Under that was the scmtools directory.  So I'm not quite
sure how to resolve that they egg isn't a directory.

On Aug 25, 1:11 pm, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm on Linux and I found the site-packages, but I don't have any
 directories under it, just the eggs.

 I also tried:   find / -name perforce.py
 and that didn't come up with anything

 On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:



  It's located under reviewboard/scmtools.  The full path for mine is: /
  usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/
  reviewboard/scmtools.  Obviously this is a Unix install.  I'm not
  quite sure where it would be for windows.  Does that help?

  On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

   Where would perforce.py be located?  I've hunted around and can't find
   it.

   On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:

I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I 
patched the file
I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
 P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
 first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
 the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
 commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
 or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there any
 way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
 argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4
 commands?- Hide quoted text -

   - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like
it... Git can't come soon enough.

Thanks for trying, I appreciate it!


On Aug 25, 1:20 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:
 hmm, at one point (I'm having issues and attmpting to re-install,
 whole 'nother story) my ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg was a top level
 directory. Under that was the scmtools directory.  So I'm not quite
 sure how to resolve that they egg isn't a directory.

 On Aug 25, 1:11 pm, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:



  I'm on Linux and I found the site-packages, but I don't have any
  directories under it, just the eggs.

  I also tried:   find / -name perforce.py
  and that didn't come up with anything

  On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:

   It's located under reviewboard/scmtools.  The full path for mine is: /
   usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/
   reviewboard/scmtools.  Obviously this is a Unix install.  I'm not
   quite sure where it would be for windows.  Does that help?

   On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

Where would perforce.py be located?  I've hunted around and can't find
it.

On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with
 the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I 
 patched the file
 I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not)

 On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote:

  I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the
  P4PASSWD properly.  We have post-review as part of a script and we
  first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in
  the environment.  Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist
  commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid
  or unset error.  I've tried everything I can think of.  Is there 
  any
  way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket
  argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the 
  P4
  commands?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

  - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


RE: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread Dana Lacoste
So, to summarize in case someone is searching through these archives
later:

Perforce, when security is turned on (this is a p4d server setting) will
have different restrictions on what can and can't be done with the
password on the CLIENT (i.e. you can't necessarily simply set an
environment variable and run with it.  For reference, see the P4
SysAdmin Guide at
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/r10.1/manuals/p4sag/03_superuser.html#1
081537 )

User RShelley is running into issues with this and is having difficulty.

http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/ has a patch (which was
discarded) which handles this situation for user tag_98007work.

But, if you're on Windows (or potentially in some other environments),
you're quite possibly using a .egg/.exe compiled version of Review
Board and therefore it may be difficult to implement patches to the .py
Python source.  If you use the interpreted version, then you can apply
the patch and things might work for you (if your environment is like
that of user tag_98007work )

Does that seem to sum things up OK?

Note that I don't see any of the problems described here, but I had to
do the following to get post-review to work for everyone:
1 - Everyone has to have the following environment set: P4PORT, P4USER,
P4CLIENT (NOT P4PASSWD!)
2 - Everyone has to be running P4V when they run post-review (I actually
added it as a tool to P4V so the users can right click on any changelist
and hit submit to reviewboard and nobody needs to use a command
line/shell command at all)
With perforce 2009.2/2010.1 this works fine with no problems : the
ticket from P4V is visible to the p4 command line (called from
post-review) and everything's fine (this is using latest RBTools
installed with the command easy_install -U RBTools and review board
1.5 beta 2)

Dana Lacoste

-Original Message-
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of RShelley
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:37 PM
To: reviewboard
Subject: Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like
it... Git can't come soon enough.

Thanks for trying, I appreciate it!

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en