OK.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1909
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Thanks. Okay, this certainly used to work, but it appears to have
> regressed. Would you mind filling a bug, and we'll try to get it into
> 1.5.2?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Chr
Thanks. Okay, this certainly used to work, but it appears to have
regressed. Would you mind filling a bug, and we'll try to get it into
1.5.2?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010
Hmm, it appears we're sending the data across. Can you tell me what
version of Review Board this is?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Hi
>
Huh, that sounds wrong. If that's truly the case, we should have a bug about
it.
-David
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> If I remember draft doesn't show fields passed as post-review command
> line parameters but they present and after publish You will see them.
> You can
If I remember draft doesn't show fields passed as post-review command
line parameters but they present and after publish You will see them.
You can also use post-review with --publish to publish review request
right away.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to cre
