Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-17 Thread Tony
I'm definitely a Python noob, but don't mind digging around in the code. I'm not familiar with python distributions and eggs, I assume I can just unzip the RBTools egg and then rezip it? I'll give it a shot when I have a free moment tomorrow and get back to you. Thanks again! tony On Sep 16,

Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-17 Thread Tony
Hmmm, so changing the regex allows post-review to detect perforce and begin uploading. However, I ran into a second problem with the way post-review is creating the repository url. I ended up just removing the whole try block from get_repository_info in the PerforceClient since it was picking up

Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-17 Thread Tony
Ahhh, crap, I'm an idiot. Forgot to put p4 on the path of my apache user. Everything seems to be chill now. One final question: What is the recommended way for distributing my local copy of the post-review tool to the others on my team? I checked out the code from git (release-0.2) as well.

Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Tony, We discourage running as root, so that wouldn't be it. It's likely that it's failing to parse the server version info. Can you type `p4 info` and show me the Server version: line, if it exists? If it doesn't, that's useful to know too, and I'd like to know if there's an equivalent line

Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-16 Thread Tony
Christian, Thanks for the quick response. I figured as much for the root thing. Realized after I sent the email that p4 wasn't on my path as root, so that explains it anyway... In terms of the p4 info the server version line is present: Server version: P4D/LINUX26AMD64/2005.2.PATCH/100601

Re: post-review and perforce

2010-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Interesting. That's definitely the problem. post-review expects the version information to be entirely numeric. I don't know what your Python comfort level is, but if you edited rbtools/rbtools/postreview.py and found the line that includes Server version: , and modified it to look like: m =

RE: post-review with perforce

2010-08-03 Thread Dana Lacoste
If you run p4 counters do you see the path to your RB server (in http://server/reviewboard/ format) in the repository_path counter? (If you have an older version of perforce the counter might have a different syntax, but it should still be visible) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From:

Re: post-review with perforce

2010-08-03 Thread rquit
I do not have p4 counter set, but I did specify the exact path in my .reviewboardrc file. On Aug 3, 1:30 pm, Dana Lacoste dlaco...@aperio.com wrote: If you run p4 counters do you see the path to your RB server (inhttp://server/reviewboard/format) in the repository_path counter? (If you have

Re: post-review in perforce

2008-09-23 Thread 13Strider
Repository info 'Path: salmon.hb-studios.local:1999, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True' Generating diff for changenum 79737 p4 describe -s 79737 Processing edit of //NBA/Branches/Release/packages/bball/live/nba/nba-main/prints.cpp Writing