The problem fixed itself. It seems like review board taking some time to
recognize the repository.
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 2:08:00 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> It looks like you have some custom amazon build of RBTools. It's pretty
> old, and there's no "arbitrary_diff" client i
It looks like you have some custom amazon build of RBTools. It's pretty
old, and there's no "arbitrary_diff" client in the upstream release.
-David
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:06 PM Avishek Neupane
wrote:
> rbt post fails with: AttributeError: Values instance has no attribute
> 'arbitrary_diff_fil
Hi Caroline,
I'd be interested in seeing how you're handling keeping the clone active.
I'm not sure what command he ran exactly, so I don't want to give the wrong
advice for your setup.
Does the clone exist solely for Review Board? Where does the main
repository live?
Christian
On Mon, Jan 8, 2
Hi,
I have same issue here.
Could you post your command of how to do reset here?
Thanks
C
On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 7:04:02 AM UTC-8, Greg Burcher wrote:
>
> Thanks Christian. Our RB server keeps a local repository, and pulls via
> cron job to stay current. When we checked that local repos
Hi Greg,
Glad you were able to find the cause! Perhaps a force push caused that
somewhere?
Christian
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 07:04 Greg Burcher wrote:
> Thanks Christian. Our RB server keeps a local repository, and pulls via
> cron job to stay current. When we checked that local repository, th
Thanks Christian. Our RB server keeps a local repository, and pulls via
cron job to stay current. When we checked that local repository, there were
merge conflicts, so all the pulls had been failing for a few days. I have
no idea why that repository would have merge conflicts, but we reset and
Hi Greg,
Are older diffs in Review Board able to load? (Ones that would have fallen
out of cache). I'm curious if this is something affecting only newer diffs.
This is often due to changes on the Git repository. Mirroring may be
failing, for instance, if this is a clone of the main repository.
M
For perforce, we really don't have support for the second style of
diff--everything should be the first (with the file revision included,
rather than a timestamp). How did you end up with a diff file that has both
styles in it??
-David
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:08 AM Subodh Konhor wrote:
> Hi D
Hi David,
You are right. parse_diff_header is parsing the header incorrectly. I can
state from a perforce diff point of view that it is incorrect.
Reviewboard server code needs to be fixed
Scenario:
reviewboard/diffviewer/parser.py +169
def parse_diff_header
if linenum + 1 < len(self.lines) an
I'm not super aware of your situation, but following a "process" just
because even though it's ridiculous in extreme cases like this is absurd.
There's no good reason why --diff-filename doesn't work with Perforce other
than that it just hasn't been used. Passing in a diff file with perforce is
ve
I also do acknowledge that it is humanly impossible to review but we have a
process of having review done for certain products before checkin is made.
Therefore we post review. So yes we do post huge diffs and cannot do away
with it.
Command I ran to post the changenum is
rbt post -d
Error i
I'm not sure what's going on in the first couple tracebacks--somehow the
diff headers aren't right. It would help if you included what command you
ran to get that output. For the last traceback, it looks like there's some
issues with perforce and 'rbt post --diff-filename'
That said, a change with
Thanks!
That error message is not very helpful.
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 3:13:42 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> The command-line syntax in rbt 0.6.x changed. To list files to include in
> the diff, use the -I flag.
>
> -David
>
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 8:01 AM, MG > wrote:
>
> I have
The command-line syntax in rbt 0.6.x changed. To list files to include in the
diff, use the -I flag.
-David
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 8:01 AM, MG wrote:
>
> I have a review board installation for a CVS repository on a server here, and
> it has been working well.
>
> A new developer has just inst
I had a similar problem few weeks ago. We have a RB working with git
repositories, and they are on separate servers. In the end I've installed
gitweb which solved issues with generating RR using rbt-post command.
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 12:19:28 PM UTC+2, Tadeusz Kozak wrote:
>
> Answering my
On 04/03/2014 07:14 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> That's why we recommend using something like cgit/gitweb on your main
> git server instead. We can then use that to access the files we need
> directly.
>
> This is all due to the lack of support for accessing individual files
> through the Git pr
That's why we recommend using something like cgit/gitweb on your main git
server instead. We can then use that to access the files we need directly.
This is all due to the lack of support for accessing individual files
through the Git protocol.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.c
Answering my own question:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/configuration/repositories/#git
In order to use Git with Review Board, you’ll need either a local clone on
the server, or by using raw file URLs to a web front-end to Git (cgit,
Gitweb, etc.) on the Git server. Git does
18 matches
Mail list logo
