Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread Christian Hammond 
Did you restart the web server after the upgrade? If not, it could just be
that you have the old modules still loaded in memory in your server.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sr55  wrote:

> Decided to do a new rb-site install, then switch the config to point
> at the old database. Seems to be a easy work-around for dodgy
> upgrades.
>
> Thanks, and thanks for the great tool.
>
> Scott
>
> On May 20, 8:57 pm, sr55  wrote:
> > Just archived the old RB egg file in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
> > to test the theory. Turns out something somewhere is still reverencing
> > it
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.5-py2.5.egg/django/
> > core/handlers/base.py", line 106, in get_response
> > response = middleware_method(request, e)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
> > djblets/log/middleware.py", line 221, in process_exception
> > exception, exc_info=1)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1294, in error
> > apply(root.error, (msg,)+args, kwargs)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1015, in error
> > apply(self._log, (ERROR, msg, args), kwargs)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1101, in _log
> > self.handle(record)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line , in handle
> > self.callHandlers(record)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1148, in
> > callHandlers
> > hdlr.handle(record)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 655, in handle
> > self.emit(record)
> >
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
> > djblets/log/handlers.py", line 80, in emit
> > self.stream.flush()
> >
> > ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
> >
> > On May 20, 8:45 pm, sr55  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hmm, Looking in the Site folder, there are sym-links to the new beta 2
> > > so maybe there is some caching going on.
> > > Would have thought restarting memcahced and lighttpd would have sorted
> > > that.
> >
> > > On May 20, 8:36 pm, sr55  wrote:
> >
> > > >https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/
> >
> > > > Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
> > > > reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I
> believe
> > > > you fixed.
> >
> > > > On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> >
> > > > > This is just the search index setting?
> >
> > > > > We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> > > > > ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was
> successful. I'd
> > > > > just change the search index setting to point to some place inside
> your side
> > > > > directory (in data/).
> >
> > > > > Christian
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
> >
> > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:
> > > > > > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the
> rb-site
> > > > > > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
> >
> > > > > > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> > > > > >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > > > -U <
> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/%0A-U
> >ReviewBoard
> > > > > > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > > > > > Readinghttp://
> downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > > > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > > > > > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > > > > > Readinghttp://
> downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > > > > > Readinghttp://
> downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > > > > > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > > > > > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > > > > > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > > > > > install.pth
> > > > > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > > > > > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
> >
> > > > > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > > > > > py2.5.egg
> > > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > > > > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > > > > > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> >
> > > > > > ---
> >
> > > > > > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > > > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > > > > > No fixtures found.
> > > > > >
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > > > > > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > > > >

Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread sr55 
Decided to do a new rb-site install, then switch the config to point
at the old database. Seems to be a easy work-around for dodgy
upgrades.

Thanks, and thanks for the great tool.

Scott

On May 20, 8:57 pm, sr55  wrote:
> Just archived the old RB egg file in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
> to test the theory. Turns out something somewhere is still reverencing
> it
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.5-py2.5.egg/django/
> core/handlers/base.py", line 106, in get_response
>     response = middleware_method(request, e)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
> djblets/log/middleware.py", line 221, in process_exception
>     exception, exc_info=1)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1294, in error
>     apply(root.error, (msg,)+args, kwargs)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1015, in error
>     apply(self._log, (ERROR, msg, args), kwargs)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1101, in _log
>     self.handle(record)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line , in handle
>     self.callHandlers(record)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1148, in
> callHandlers
>     hdlr.handle(record)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 655, in handle
>     self.emit(record)
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
> djblets/log/handlers.py", line 80, in emit
>     self.stream.flush()
>
> ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
>
> On May 20, 8:45 pm, sr55  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hmm, Looking in the Site folder, there are sym-links to the new beta 2
> > so maybe there is some caching going on.
> > Would have thought restarting memcahced and lighttpd would have sorted
> > that.
>
> > On May 20, 8:36 pm, sr55  wrote:
>
> > >https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/
>
> > > Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
> > > reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I believe
> > > you fixed.
>
> > > On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
>
> > > > This is just the search index setting?
>
> > > > We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> > > > ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was 
> > > > successful. I'd
> > > > just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your 
> > > > side
> > > > directory (in data/).
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:
> > > > > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> > > > > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
> > > > > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> > > > >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > > -U 
> > > > > ReviewBoard
> > > > > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > > > > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > > > > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > > > > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > > > > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > > > > install.pth
> > > > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > > > > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> > > > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > > > > py2.5.egg
> > > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > > > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > > > > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> > > > > ---
>
> > > > > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > > > > No fixtures found.
> > > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > > > > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > > > > application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> > > > >http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
> > > > >  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> > > > > No evolution required.
> > > > > Upgrade complete.
>
> > > > > --
>
> > > > > /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> > > > > No evolution required.
>
> > > > > 
>
> > > > > Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> > > > > Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> > > > > I noticed in the site confi

Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread sr55 
Just archived the old RB egg file in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
to test the theory. Turns out something somewhere is still reverencing
it

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.5-py2.5.egg/django/
core/handlers/base.py", line 106, in get_response
response = middleware_method(request, e)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
djblets/log/middleware.py", line 221, in process_exception
exception, exc_info=1)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1294, in error
apply(root.error, (msg,)+args, kwargs)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1015, in error
apply(self._log, (ERROR, msg, args), kwargs)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1101, in _log
self.handle(record)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line , in handle
self.callHandlers(record)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 1148, in
callHandlers
hdlr.handle(record)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py", line 655, in handle
self.emit(record)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.5.egg/
djblets/log/handlers.py", line 80, in emit
self.stream.flush()

ValueError: I/O operation on closed file


On May 20, 8:45 pm, sr55  wrote:
> Hmm, Looking in the Site folder, there are sym-links to the new beta 2
> so maybe there is some caching going on.
> Would have thought restarting memcahced and lighttpd would have sorted
> that.
>
> On May 20, 8:36 pm, sr55  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/
>
> > Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
> > reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I believe
> > you fixed.
>
> > On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
>
> > > This is just the search index setting?
>
> > > We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> > > ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was successful. 
> > > I'd
> > > just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your 
> > > side
> > > directory (in data/).
>
> > > Christian
>
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:
> > > > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> > > > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
> > > > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> > > >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > -U 
> > > > ReviewBoard
> > > > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > > > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > > > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > > > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > > > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > > > install.pth
> > > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > > > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> > > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > > > py2.5.egg
> > > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > > > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> > > > ---
>
> > > > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > > > No fixtures found.
> > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > > > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > > > application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> > > >http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
> > > >  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> > > > No evolution required.
> > > > Upgrade complete.
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> > > > No evolution required.
>
> > > > 
>
> > > > Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> > > > Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> > > > I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
> > > > Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
> > > > ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"
>
> > > > --
> > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread sr55 
Hmm, Looking in the Site folder, there are sym-links to the new beta 2
so maybe there is some caching going on.
Would have thought restarting memcahced and lighttpd would have sorted
that.

On May 20, 8:36 pm, sr55  wrote:
> https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/
>
> Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
> reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I believe
> you fixed.
>
> On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is just the search index setting?
>
> > We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> > ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was successful. I'd
> > just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your side
> > directory (in data/).
>
> > Christian
>
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:
> > > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> > > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
> > > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> > >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > -U 
> > > ReviewBoard
> > > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > > install.pth
> > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > > py2.5.egg
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> > > ---
>
> > > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > > No fixtures found.
> > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > > application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> > >http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
> > >  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> > > No evolution required.
> > > Upgrade complete.
>
> > > --
>
> > > /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> > > No evolution required.
>
> > > 
>
> > > Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> > > Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> > > I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
> > > Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
> > > ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"
>
> > > --
> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread sr55 
https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/

Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I believe
you fixed.

On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> This is just the search index setting?
>
> We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was successful. I'd
> just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your side
> directory (in data/).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:
> > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
> > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > -U 
> > ReviewBoard
> > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > install.pth
> > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > py2.5.egg
> > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> > ---
>
> > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > Rebuilding directory structure
> > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > No fixtures found.
> > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> >http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
> >  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> > No evolution required.
> > Upgrade complete.
>
> > --
>
> > /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> > No evolution required.
>
> > 
>
> > Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> > Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> > I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
> > Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
> > ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"
>
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread Christian Hammond 
This is just the search index setting?

We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was successful. I'd
just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your side
directory (in data/).

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55  wrote:

> Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
>
> /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> -U 
> ReviewBoard
> Searching for ReviewBoard
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> Reading http://www.review-board.org/
> Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> install.pth
> Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> py2.5.egg
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> ---
>
> /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
> No fixtures found.
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
>  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> No evolution required.
> Upgrade complete.
>
> --
>
> /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> No evolution required.
>
> 
>
> Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
> Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
> ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Upgrading 1.6 beta 1 -> beta 2.1

2011-05-20 Thread sr55 
Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:


/www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f 
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
-U ReviewBoard
Searching for ReviewBoard
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
install.pth
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
py2.5.egg
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard

---

/www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
No fixtures found.
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
No evolution required.
Upgrade complete.

--

/www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
No evolution required.



Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1

Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5

I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en