Re: Where is the post-review tool
Does anyone else use cygwin + reviewboard, so I can see if it is just my installation or if it is a showstopper? Thanks, On Dec 5, 10:20 am, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that this all used to work. > > The old way of doing commands (v.0.7) was something like this: > > cmd = "p4 where \"%s\"" % (depot_path,) > where_output = execute(cmd).splitlines() > > The new way (v0.8) is something like this: > > where_output = execute(["p4", "where", depot_path], > split_lines=True) > > I've played with trying to fix these before, but the entire script now > does the execute command the "new" way, and I've never been able to > get them all. > > On Dec 4, 6:11 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, that would do it. > > > You sohuld be able to run Cygwin stuff from a dos box if you specify the > > full path to python. Could do a post-review wrapper script that does: > > > c:\cygwin\bin\python \path\to\post-review blah blah > > > See if it works at all. > > > Ideally we'd make this work with cygwin, certainly, but I don't have > > anything set up to work on this right now so I'm not in a good position to > > investigate and fix it. Any takers? > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > VMware, Inc. > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: > > > > $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp > > > //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // > > > apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: > > > \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp > > > > -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. > > > > On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the > > > > machine. > > > > > we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools > > > > fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or > > > weird > > > > > stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. > > > > > > There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. > > > Instead > > > > > of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. > > > > > > Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > -- > > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > > > > > > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > > > > > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > > > > > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on > > > > > > a > > > > > > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the > > > post- > > > > > > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > > > > > > that things would settle down... our production environment is > > > > > > running something that is old - probably around March or April > > > > > > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to > > > make > > > > > > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that > > > > > > all > > > > > > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes > > > > > > the > > > > > > server side a snap. The client side though... > > > > > > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > > > > > > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run > > > the > > > > > > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a > > > windows- > > > > > > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > > > > > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > > > > > > \myfile.cpp > > > > > > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > > > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > AndyP wrote: > > > > > > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and > > > can't > > > > > > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go > > > to get > > > > > > > > it? > > > > > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you > > > don't > > > > > > > have svn to hand): > > > >http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > > > > > Chris- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Re: Where is the post-review tool
Note that this all used to work. The old way of doing commands (v.0.7) was something like this: cmd = "p4 where \"%s\"" % (depot_path,) where_output = execute(cmd).splitlines() The new way (v0.8) is something like this: where_output = execute(["p4", "where", depot_path], split_lines=True) I've played with trying to fix these before, but the entire script now does the execute command the "new" way, and I've never been able to get them all. On Dec 4, 6:11 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that would do it. > > You sohuld be able to run Cygwin stuff from a dos box if you specify the > full path to python. Could do a post-review wrapper script that does: > > c:\cygwin\bin\python \path\to\post-review blah blah > > See if it works at all. > > Ideally we'd make this work with cygwin, certainly, but I don't have > anything set up to work on this right now so I'm not in a good position to > investigate and fix it. Any takers? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > VMware, Inc. > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: > > > $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp > > //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // > > apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: > > \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp > > > -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. > > > On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the > > > machine. > > > > we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools > > > fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or > > weird > > > > stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. > > > > > There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. > > Instead > > > > of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. > > > > > Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > > > > > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > > > > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > > > > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a > > > > > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the > > post- > > > > > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > > > > > that things would settle down... our production environment is > > > > > running something that is old - probably around March or April > > > > > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to > > make > > > > > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all > > > > > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the > > > > > server side a snap. The client side though... > > > > > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > > > > > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run > > the > > > > > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a > > windows- > > > > > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > > > > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > > > > > \myfile.cpp > > > > > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > AndyP wrote: > > > > > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and > > can't > > > > > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go > > to get > > > > > > > it? > > > > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you > > don't > > > > > > have svn to hand): > > >http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > > > > Chris- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
Yeah, that would do it. You sohuld be able to run Cygwin stuff from a dos box if you specify the full path to python. Could do a post-review wrapper script that does: c:\cygwin\bin\python \path\to\post-review blah blah See if it works at all. Ideally we'd make this work with cygwin, certainly, but I don't have anything set up to work on this right now so I'm not in a good position to investigate and fix it. Any takers? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: > > $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp > //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // > apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: > \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp > > > -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. > > > > On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the > > machine. > > > > we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools > > fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or > weird > > > stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. > > > > > There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. > Instead > > > of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. > > > > > Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > > > > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > > > > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > > > > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a > > > > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the > post- > > > > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > > > > that things would settle down... our production environment is > > > > running something that is old - probably around March or April > > > > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to > make > > > > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all > > > > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the > > > > server side a snap. The client side though... > > > > > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > > > > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run > the > > > > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a > windows- > > > > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > > > > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > > > > \myfile.cpp > > > > > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > AndyP wrote: > > > > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and > can't > > > > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go > to get > > > > > > it? > > > > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you > don't > > > > > have svn to hand): > > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > > > > Chris- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the > machine. > > we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools > fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! > > Thanks! > > On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or weird > > stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. > > > There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. Instead > > of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. > > > Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > VMware, Inc. > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > > > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a > > > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- > > > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > > > that things would settle down... our production environment is > > > running something that is old - probably around March or April > > > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make > > > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all > > > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the > > > server side a snap. The client side though... > > > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > > > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run the > > > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- > > > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > > > \myfile.cpp > > > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > AndyP wrote: > > > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > > > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > > > > > it? > > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't > > > > have svn to hand): > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > > Chris- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the machine. we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! Thanks! On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or weird > stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. > > There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. Instead > of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. > > Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > VMware, Inc. > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a > > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- > > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > > that things would settle down... our production environment is > > running something that is old - probably around March or April > > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make > > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all > > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the > > server side a snap. The client side though... > > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run the > > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- > > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > > \myfile.cpp > > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AndyP wrote: > > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > > > > it? > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't > > > have svn to hand): > > > >http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > Chris- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or weird stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. Instead of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ > ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools > > Is this the latest and greatest? > > I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a > windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- > review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping > that things would settle down... our production environment is > running something that is old - probably around March or April > timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make > it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all > that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the > server side a snap. The client side though... > > The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is > "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run the > -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- > formatted-pathname. i.e. > > diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file > \myfile.cpp > > and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. > > > > On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AndyP wrote: > > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > > > it? > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't > > have svn to hand): > > > > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > > > Chris > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools Is this the latest and greatest? I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping that things would settle down... our production environment is running something that is old - probably around March or April timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the server side a snap. The client side though... The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is "Unable to parse diff header". It's pretty obvious why when I run the -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- formatted-pathname. i.e. diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file \myfile.cpp and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AndyP wrote: > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > > it? > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't > have svn to hand): > > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... > > Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
Yeah, this is the way to do it. Before long (pre-1.0) I expect to make post-review its own easy_installable thing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AndyP wrote: > > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > > it? > > > > > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't > have svn to hand): > > > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-review > > Chris > > > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
AndyP wrote: > I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't > find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get > it? > You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-review Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Where is the post-review tool
I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
