Re: Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-29 Thread David Trowbridge 
Is the group in question marked "Invite only"? Review requests sent to an
access-controlled group will not even appear to logged-in users who aren't
members, much less anonymous users.

-David


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM,  wrote:

> I can get at /r/.  However, When I removed some people from a group, I got
> the complaint that they could not see other reviews posted to their group.
> This is what led me to ask why the green enabled circle was grayed out when
> I had the site configured for public read-only access.  I added them back
> into the specific group and the problem went away.
>
> On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:33:15 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> I've just tried this on our installation, and it's working fine here.
>> 1.7.9 is a bit older now, though I'm not aware of this feature having been
>> broken at any point.
>>
>> Can you tell me the repro case? If you're logged out, you're unable to
>> access /r/ ?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM,  wrote:
>>
>>>  Even with this checkbox checked, the state of "Public Read-only
>>> access" is always disabled.   If I look at the site configuration in the
>>> admin database :Change site Configuration" page, settings has
>>> u'auth_require_sitewide_login'**: False in it.  I poked around in the
>>> code and auth_anonymous_access is initialized to the inverse of this
>>> setting.  And the "Public Read-only Access" state is driven by this
>>> variable.  So I'm at a loss as to why this is not behaving like it should.
>>> The verison of RB that I am running is 1.7.9 with Python 2.6, Oracle Linux
>>> 6.4 x86_64.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/**
>>> powerpack/ 
>>> ---
>>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
>>> ---
>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>  --
> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> ---
> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
> ---
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-29 Thread jeffdomogala 
I can get at /r/.  However, When I removed some people from a group, I got 
the complaint that they could not see other reviews posted to their group.  
This is what led me to ask why the green enabled circle was grayed out when 
I had the site configured for public read-only access.  I added them back 
into the specific group and the problem went away.

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:33:15 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> I've just tried this on our installation, and it's working fine here. 
> 1.7.9 is a bit older now, though I'm not aware of this feature having been 
> broken at any point.
>
> Can you tell me the repro case? If you're logged out, you're unable to 
> access /r/ ?
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>  
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM, >wrote:
>
>> Even with this checkbox checked, the state of "Public Read-only access" 
>> is always disabled.   If I look at the site configuration in the admin 
>> database :Change site Configuration" page, settings has 
>> u'auth_require_sitewide_login': False in it.  I poked around in the code 
>> and auth_anonymous_access is initialized to the inverse of this setting.  
>> And the "Public Read-only Access" state is driven by this variable.  So I'm 
>> at a loss as to why this is not behaving like it should. The verison of RB 
>> that I am running is 1.7.9 with Python 2.6, Oracle Linux 6.4 x86_64.
>>  
>> -- 
>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> ---
>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
>> ---
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-17 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi Jeff,

I've just tried this on our installation, and it's working fine here. 1.7.9
is a bit older now, though I'm not aware of this feature having been broken
at any point.

Can you tell me the repro case? If you're logged out, you're unable to
access /r/ ?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM,  wrote:

> Even with this checkbox checked, the state of "Public Read-only access" is
> always disabled.   If I look at the site configuration in the admin
> database :Change site Configuration" page, settings has
> u'auth_require_sitewide_login': False in it.  I poked around in the code
> and auth_anonymous_access is initialized to the inverse of this setting.
> And the "Public Read-only Access" state is driven by this variable.  So I'm
> at a loss as to why this is not behaving like it should. The verison of RB
> that I am running is 1.7.9 with Python 2.6, Oracle Linux 6.4 x86_64.
>
> --
> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> ---
> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
> ---
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-17 Thread jeffdomogala 
Even with this checkbox checked, the state of "Public Read-only access" is 
always disabled.   If I look at the site configuration in the admin 
database :Change site Configuration" page, settings has 
u'auth_require_sitewide_login': False in it.  I poked around in the code 
and auth_anonymous_access is initialized to the inverse of this setting.  
And the "Public Read-only Access" state is driven by this variable.  So I'm 
at a loss as to why this is not behaving like it should. The verison of RB 
that I am running is 1.7.9 with Python 2.6, Oracle Linux 6.4 x86_64.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: anonymous read only access

2012-10-28 Thread Heinz Wiesinger 
Hi Christian,

I entered issue 2787 
(http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2787 )

I checked again and anonymous access is in fact enabled now on my site, but 
the checkbox is still unchecked.
I haven't seen this yet with any other setting.

Grs,
Heinz

On Thursday 25 October 2012 16:27:47 Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Heinz,
> 
> I haven't encountered this yet, but will give it a try later. Would you
> mind filing a bug to track this?
> 
> Does this happen with any other settings?
> 
> Christian
> 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I set up a new reviewboard site using 1.6.13. I'm trying to enable
> > anonymous
> > read only access, but it does not seem to work.
> > 
> > I check the checkbox in settings and click on 'Save'. The site tells me
> > 'The
> > settings have been saved.', but the checkbox is unchecked and anonymous
> > access
> > is not possible. Am I missing something?
> > 
> > Grs,
> > Heinz

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: anonymous read only access

2012-10-25 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi Heinz,

I haven't encountered this yet, but will give it a try later. Would you
mind filing a bug to track this?

Does this happen with any other settings?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I set up a new reviewboard site using 1.6.13. I'm trying to enable
> anonymous
> read only access, but it does not seem to work.
>
> I check the checkbox in settings and click on 'Save'. The site tells me
> 'The
> settings have been saved.', but the checkbox is unchecked and anonymous
> access
> is not possible. Am I missing something?
>
> Grs,
> Heinz

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

anonymous read only access

2012-10-24 Thread Heinz Wiesinger 
Hi!

I set up a new reviewboard site using 1.6.13. I'm trying to enable anonymous 
read only access, but it does not seem to work.

I check the checkbox in settings and click on 'Save'. The site tells me 'The 
settings have been saved.', but the checkbox is unchecked and anonymous access 
is not possible. Am I missing something?

Grs,
Heinz

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.