Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32597/#review78759 --- src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PendingTa

Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32806/#review78760 --- Master (a7b95d9) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/b

Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32806/ --- (Updated April 3, 2015, 3:06 a.m.) Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and

Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32806/#review78758 --- Master (a7b95d9) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/b

Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32806/ --- Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Kevin Sweeney. Repository: aurora

Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32802/ --- (Updated April 3, 2015, 2:19 a.m.) Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutorne

Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32802/#review78756 --- This patch does not apply cleanly on master (a7b95d9), do you need t

Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32802/ --- Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko. Repository: aurora Descripti

Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32597/#review78744 --- Master (a7b95d9) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/b

Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32597/ --- (Updated April 2, 2015, 11:39 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and

Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32597/ --- (Updated April 2, 2015, 11:39 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and

Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32541/#review78685 --- Master (4b9c759) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/b

Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32541/ --- (Updated April 2, 2015, 5:33 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and

Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support.

> On April 1, 2015, 8:40 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/BUILD, line 29 > > > > > > How about "kaurora" > > Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > This is a joke, right? :) If not I am r

Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32559/#review78608 --- src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/Authori

Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support.

> On April 1, 2015, 1:40 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/BUILD, line 29 > > > > > > How about "kaurora" > > Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > This is a joke, right? :) If not I am r