Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-21 Thread Bill Farner
> On Nov. 21, 2017, 9:57 a.m., Stephan Erb wrote: > > I am not completely through but have a first set of comments. > > > > While reviewing this PR I got confused for second in `PruningModule.java`: > > Please notice the difference between `HistoryPrunnerSettings` vs > >

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-21 Thread Bill Farner
> On Nov. 21, 2017, 10:53 a.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > Are we sure this was purely a database optimization? This looks like it > > will now write the entire JobUpdateDetails to the replicated log for every > > instance event change? In large clusters this could impact write log write > >

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-21 Thread David McLaughlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63884/#review191621 --- Are we sure this was purely a database optimization? This looks

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-21 Thread Stephan Erb
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63884/#review191592 --- I am not completely through but have a first set of comments.

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-21 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63884/#review191580 --- Ping - Bill Farner On Nov. 16, 2017, 10:20 a.m., Bill Farner

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-16 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63884/#review191237 --- Ship it! Master (46b1112) is green with this patch.

Re: Review Request 63884: Idempotent Ops and slimmed API for JobUpdateStore

2017-11-16 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63884/#review191206 --- Annotated the diff with some reviewer notes.