Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Zameer Manji
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26464/ --- Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Bill Farner. Bugs: AURORA-819

Re: Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Bill Farner
On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:31 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: Ship It! This is now on master: $ git log -1 --abbrev-commit origin/master commit 18ae905 Author: Zameer Manji zma...@twopensource.com Date: Wed Oct 8 16:33:42 2014 -0700 Blacklist

Re: Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Joshua Cohen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26464/#review55900 --- This doesn't actually fail when I run it locally. I'm worried that

Re: Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Bill Farner
On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:50 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote: This doesn't actually fail when I run it locally. I'm worried that we're just fixing a symptom of the problem, and not the problem itself (i.e. we're going to be adding random classes to the legacy list despite their actually having

Re: Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Joshua Cohen
On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:50 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote: This doesn't actually fail when I run it locally. I'm worried that we're just fixing a symptom of the problem, and not the problem itself (i.e. we're going to be adding random classes to the legacy list despite their actually having

Re: Review Request 26464: Blacklist org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiBeta$2 which has no coverage.

2014-10-08 Thread Joshua Cohen
On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:50 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote: This doesn't actually fail when I run it locally. I'm worried that we're just fixing a symptom of the problem, and not the problem itself (i.e. we're going to be adding random classes to the legacy list despite their actually having