Review Request 19819: AURORA-29: Clean up resource files under src/resources/org/apache/

2014-03-28 Thread Dan Norris
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19819/ --- Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner. Bugs: AURORA-29 https://issues.a

Re: Review Request 18537: AURORA-227: Aurora build should check for the Python version

2014-03-28 Thread Dan Norris
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18537/ --- (Updated March 29, 2014, 2:11 a.m.) Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney an

Re: Review Request 19462: [AURORA-282] add gradle target distDeb

2014-03-28 Thread Jake Farrell
> On March 28, 2014, 11:14 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > I'm slightly concerned over further expanding the installation requirements > > for developing on aurora. So far we've made efforts to minimize this > > (gradle wrapper, building thrift on the fly). > > > > Jake - can you think of a sane

Re: Review Request 19808: Remove the failed JobManager abstraction.

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19808/#review38970 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Sweeney On March 28, 2014, 2:51 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 19462: [AURORA-282] add gradle target distDeb

2014-03-28 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19462/#review38965 --- I'm slightly concerned over further expanding the installation requi

Re: Review Request 18537: AURORA-227: Aurora build should check for the Python version

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18537/#review38962 --- Looks like this fails to apply - mind uploading a rebased version?

Re: Review Request 18537: AURORA-227: Aurora build should check for the Python version

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18537/#review38953 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Sweeney On March 21, 2014, 7:59 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 19806: Fix javadoc generation

2014-03-28 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19806/#review38952 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Bill Farner On March 28, 2014, 9:41 p.m., Ke

Review Request 19808: Remove the failed JobManager abstraction.

2014-03-28 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19808/ --- Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Suman Karumuri. Repository: aurora

Review Request 19806: Fix javadoc generation

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19806/ --- Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner. Bugs: AURORA-297 https://issues.

Re: Review Request 19648: Preserving sandbox deleted task history.

2014-03-28 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19648/ --- (Updated March 28, 2014, 9:28 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney, S

Re: Review Request 19648: Preserving sandbox deleted task history.

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19648/#review38948 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Sweeney On March 27, 2014, 5:27 p.m.,

Review Request 19796: AURORA-145:Test dependencies leak into distribution

2014-03-28 Thread Jake Farrell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19796/ --- Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Bill Farner. Bugs: AURORA-145

Re: Review Request 19648: Preserving sandbox deleted task history.

2014-03-28 Thread Suman Karumuri
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19648/#review38924 --- Ship it! - Suman Karumuri On March 28, 2014, 12:27 a.m., Maxim Kh

Re: Review Request 19648: Preserving sandbox deleted task history.

2014-03-28 Thread Suman Karumuri
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19648/#review38923 --- Ship it! - Suman Karumuri On March 28, 2014, 12:27 a.m., Maxim Kh

Re: Review Request 19648: Preserving sandbox deleted task history.

2014-03-28 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19648/#review38921 --- Ping Kevin, Suman. - Maxim Khutornenko On March 28, 2014, 12:27 a

Re: Review Request 19709: CrontabEntry parser

2014-03-28 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19709/#review38903 --- Ship it! src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/cron/CrontabEnt

Re: Review Request 19788: Add a clientv2 version of the e2e test.

2014-03-28 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19788/#review38919 --- src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end_v2.sh

Re: Review Request 19709: CrontabEntry parser

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19709/ --- (Updated March 28, 2014, 10:31 a.m.) Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornen

Re: Review Request 19709: CrontabEntry parser

2014-03-28 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19709/ --- (Updated March 28, 2014, 10:30 a.m.) Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornen

Review Request 19788: Add a clientv2 version of the e2e test.

2014-03-28 Thread Mark Chu-Carroll
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19788/ --- Review request for Aurora, Joe Smith and Kevin Sweeney. Bugs: aurora-266 ht

Re: Review Request 19767: CronScheduler based on Quartz

2014-03-28 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19767/#review38909 --- I'll stand down here on the assumption that an updated diff is incom