On Dec. 11, 2014, 10:56 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/BUILD, line 102
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/diff/1/?file=789841#file789841line102
Are we going to keep the artifact name like this?
Good catch, i think we should not. Fixed.
- Bill
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/#review66912
---
Ship it!
docs/clientv2.md
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 9:23 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and
On Jan. 6, 2015, 9:20 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
docs/clientv2.md, line 180
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/diff/2/?file=808002#file808002line180
remove reference to more consistent. I think this doc was initially
written as a design doc to justify the client rewrite, might
On Dec. 16, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
docs/client-commands.md, line 192
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/diff/1/?file=789836#file789836line192
while at it, how about s/shard/instance/g/
Done.
On Dec. 16, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 9:15 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/#review65152
---
docs/client-commands.md
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/
---
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Maxim Khutornenko.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/#review64805
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/BUILD
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28971/#review64816
---
Ship it!
Master (07bc3ab) is green with this patch.
10 matches
Mail list logo