Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-06-02 Thread Mark Wang
On June 1, 2015, 7:45 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: I will get this committed for you, but I'll remove the operators you've added here as it probably warrants more discussion. OK. - Mark --- This is an automatically generated e-mail.

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-06-02 Thread Mark Wang
On June 1, 2015, 7:55 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/option_tests.cpp, lines 98-107 https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/diff/4/?file=975095#file975095line98 FYI I've also shortened the test: ``` TEST(OptionTest, NonConstReference)

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-06-01 Thread Ben Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review86055 --- Ship it! I will get this committed for you, but I'll remove the

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-06-01 Thread Ben Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review86057 --- 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/option_tests.cpp

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Mesos ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85889 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [34529] All tests passed. -

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Michael Park
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85890 --- Ship it! Mark, thanks for your contribution! I've left a couple of

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Mark Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/ --- (Updated May 31, 2015, 1:13 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Joris Van

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Michael Park
On May 31, 2015, 3:15 a.m., Mark Wang wrote: for Not sure how this got here. Please ignore. - Michael --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85890

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Mesos ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85899 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [34529] All tests passed. -

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Mark Wang
On May 31, 2015, 3:15 a.m., Michael Park wrote: Mark, thanks for your contribution! I've left a couple of comments below regarding the test, but the option code looks good to me! Thanks for the review, Michael! On May 31, 2015, 3:15 a.m., Michael Park wrote:

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-30 Thread Mark Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/ --- (Updated May 31, 2015, 4:39 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Joris Van

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-29 Thread Joris Van Remoortere
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85792 --- Ship it! Hey Mark, Thanks for your work! I left some comments, but

Re: Review Request 34529: Add non-const reference version of OptionT::get.

2015-05-27 Thread Mesos ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34529/#review85338 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [34529] All tests passed. -