Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212372 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Gilbert Song On Nov. 30, 2018, 8:33

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

> On Jan. 25, 2019, 10 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > Mesos is not responsible for packaging, which means that Mesos does not > > provide a default seccomp config. However, it may be hard for many > > operators to figure out a common seccomp profile on Mesos. Could we add a > > recommended

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212317 --- Mesos is not responsible for packaging, which means that Mesos

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

> On Jan. 23, 2019, 7:26 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > docs/isolators/linux-seccomp.md > > Lines 44 (patched) > > > > > > :5050 ? I think it is just a snippet. No one will copy-paste blindly it ever. I don't want to

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212225 --- Fix it, then Ship it! docs/isolators/linux-seccomp.md Lines

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212153 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review212067 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211803 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211577 --- docs/isolators/linux-seccomp.md Lines 10-11 (patched)

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211538 --- docs/mesos-containerizer.md Lines 52 (patched)

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211392 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211048 --- Bad patch! Reviews applied: [69493, 69420, 69409, 68022, 68021,

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review211040 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Re: Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/#review210976 --- FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844. Failed

Review Request 69493: Documented the `linux/seccomp` isolator.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69493/ --- Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, James Peach, and Qian Zhang. Bugs: