Re: Review Request 45491: Refactored subprocess options [1/5].

2016-04-07 Thread haosdent huang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#review127636 --- 3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp (line 67)

Re: Review Request 45491: Refactored subprocess options [1/5].

2016-04-07 Thread Joerg Schad
> On April 5, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp, line 219 > > > > > > Do we use this `operator() ()` style elsewhere? If you mean `operator()()` (vs

Re: Review Request 45491: Refactored subprocess options [1/5].

2016-04-07 Thread Joerg Schad
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/ --- (Updated April 7, 2016, 4:55 p.m.) Review request for mesos and Joris Van

Re: Review Request 45491: Refactored subprocess options [1/5].

2016-04-05 Thread Joris Van Remoortere
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#review127172 --- 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp (line 80)

Re: Review Request 45491: Refactored subprocess options [1/5].

2016-03-31 Thread Joerg Schad
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/ --- (Updated March 31, 2016, 10:21 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Joris Van