Re: Review Request 69861: Declared `HierarchicalAllocatorProcess::allocatable` `const`.

2019-01-30 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Jan. 30, 2019, 5:09 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > Thanks! Probably don't need the duplicate description in the commit message? > > Benjamin Bannier wrote: > The way we have our reviewboard interaction set up, not manually > adjusting a redundant description is actually the easier

Re: Review Request 69861: Declared `HierarchicalAllocatorProcess::allocatable` `const`.

2019-01-30 Thread Benjamin Mahler
> On Jan. 30, 2019, 4:09 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > Thanks! Probably don't need the duplicate description in the commit message? > > Benjamin Bannier wrote: > The way we have our reviewboard interaction set up, not manually > adjusting a redundant description is actually the easier

Re: Review Request 69861: Declared `HierarchicalAllocatorProcess::allocatable` `const`.

2019-01-30 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Jan. 30, 2019, 5:09 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > Thanks! Probably don't need the duplicate description in the commit message? The way we have our reviewboard interaction set up, not manually adjusting a redundant description is actually the easier way: During post-review it gets

Re: Review Request 69861: Declared `HierarchicalAllocatorProcess::allocatable` `const`.

2019-01-30 Thread Benjamin Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69861/#review212452 --- Ship it! Thanks! Probably don't need the duplicate description

Review Request 69861: Declared `HierarchicalAllocatorProcess::allocatable` `const`.

2019-01-30 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69861/ --- Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Meng Zhu. Repository: mesos