Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#discussion_r11721049
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/NetworkReceiver.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40686088
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14200/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40686086
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40686035
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40686031
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40685935
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-40685792
@CodingCat do you mind submitting a separate PR for the Scala files? We can
update documentation changes anytime we want.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#discussion_r11720795
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/NetworkReceiver.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#discussion_r11720775
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/NetworkReceiver.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/416#issuecomment-40685643
@pwendell :smile: i think this also closes SPARK-1464 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40685083
Changing to `SparkExcepation` should not break the API since
`SparkExcepation` is a subclass of `Exception`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/416#issuecomment-40684649
@techaddict thanks for doing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720277
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -333,15 +325,29 @@ trait ClientBase extends Logging {
if (u
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -123,6 +142,14 @@ object SparkSubmit {
val options = List[OptionAssi
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720264
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -666,13 +696,7 @@ The following variables can be set in `spark-env.sh`:
* `JAVA_HOME`, the location where Java is i
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720122
--- Diff:
yarn/stable/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkHadoopU
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720118
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -424,29 +431,29 @@ object ClientBase {
}
}
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720080
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -333,15 +325,29 @@ trait ClientBase extends Logging {
if
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720047
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -666,13 +696,7 @@ The following variables can be set in `spark-env.sh`:
* `JAVA_HOME`, the location where Java is
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11720017
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -643,6 +646,34 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Number of
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719981
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -42,11 +42,21 @@ private[spark] class SparkDeploy
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719922
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -123,6 +142,14 @@ object SparkSubmit {
val options = List[Optio
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719892
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +112,21 @@ object SparkSubmit {
val sysProps = new HashMap[Str
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719879
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -17,14 +17,17 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
-import
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719873
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -17,14 +17,17 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
-import
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11719747
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,81 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends
Cloneable with Loggin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40682760
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40682753
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40682524
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40682518
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40682308
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40681911
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40681913
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14199/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40681856
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40681854
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11718975
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,81 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends
Cloneable with Logging {
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11718991
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,81 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends
Cloneable with Logging {
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#discussion_r11718962
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -123,6 +142,14 @@ object SparkSubmit {
val options = List[OptionAssi
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40678433
@rxin thanks for the comments, just addressed that and wait for Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40678230
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/430#issuecomment-40678240
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user abhishekkr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/392#issuecomment-40677223
@rxin sure
Gets Fixed via #399
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user abhishekkr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/392
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user iven commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/60#issuecomment-40677116
I run SparkPi serveral times, and get different results:
1. With slices < 200, the executors all succeeds, and the framework gives
correct result.
2. With slices > 400,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#discussion_r11717029
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -725,6 +725,9 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
* Return
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#discussion_r11716967
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -725,6 +725,9 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
* Ret
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/399
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21#issuecomment-40675112
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/414#issuecomment-40675137
From the side of the life cycle for component, only stop method is
incomplete, and the initialize code , start code written separately is better
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/424#issuecomment-40675113
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/424#issuecomment-40675114
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14197/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21#issuecomment-40675115
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14198/
---
If your project i
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-40674103
``` scala
// inline
while (i < 100) {
if (log.isInfoEnabled) // will only perform here more than micro
println("" + Thread.currentThread.getStackTra
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-40673583
Let me look at the failed unit tests. Should not affect PR too much, I
think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/399#issuecomment-40673509
Thanks. Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-40673438
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14193/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40673440
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14195/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40673436
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14194/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-40673431
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21#issuecomment-40673442
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/367#issuecomment-40673439
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14191/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40673435
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40673433
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/399#issuecomment-40673432
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/367#issuecomment-40673434
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/399#issuecomment-40673437
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14192/
---
If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/416
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/409
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/403
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/139#issuecomment-40672235
@mateiz : Do you still think we should try and get this in for 1.0 / is it
in a good state to merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/428#issuecomment-40672184
ok, i will update the doc to indicate this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/428#issuecomment-40671798
The upcoming Scala 2.11 now supports case classes with more than 22 fields
https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7296
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/416#issuecomment-40671448
Merged this, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21#issuecomment-40670904
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/409#issuecomment-40670865
thanks. merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21#issuecomment-40670833
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/425#issuecomment-40670648
I merged this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/424#issuecomment-40670381
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/424#issuecomment-40670377
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-40670366
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-40670367
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14196/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-40670316
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/425#issuecomment-40670315
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14190/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/425#issuecomment-40670314
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/403#issuecomment-40670132
Thanks I've merged this. But in general we have changed numTasks to
numPartitions in the code. We should change all documentations to use
numPartitions instead. Do you mind s
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/368
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/431
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/401
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/411
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10#issuecomment-40669952
Sorry it took us a while to respond... there are too many open pull
requests!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10#issuecomment-40669939
It would be great to not having to introduce algebird. Do you mind updating
the PR?
cc @jegonzal and @ankurdave
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40669892
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40669891
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-40669877
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40669874
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/422#issuecomment-40669872
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#issuecomment-40669866
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/365#discussion_r11714952
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/BasicOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -396,6 +396,16 @@ class BasicOperationsSuite extends TestSuiteBas
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-40669823
@shivaram can you take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
