Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1472#issuecomment-49689468
I have tested this on a standalone cluster, purposefully changing the
directory structure of the driver to be different from that of the executors. I
was able to
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207593
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Spark's
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207614
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -1247,15 +1262,16 @@ def combineLocally(iterator):
return combiners.iteritems()
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207622
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -168,6 +169,20 @@ def _replaceRoot(self, value):
self._sink(1)
+def _parse_memory(s):
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207630
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -297,6 +297,33 @@ class MarshalSerializer(FramedSerializer):
loads = marshal.loads
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207645
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207668
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207662
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207683
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -47,6 +48,40 @@
SPARK_HOME = os.environ[SPARK_HOME]
+class TestMerger(unittest.TestCase):
+
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1507#issuecomment-49690248
@kayousterhout
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207731
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -1247,15 +1262,16 @@ def combineLocally(iterator):
return combiners.iteritems()
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207721
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -1247,15 +1262,16 @@ def combineLocally(iterator):
return combiners.iteritems()
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207775
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user li-zhihui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1462#issuecomment-49690527
Sorry @tgravescs @kayousterhout I am not aware of the issue's seriousness
at that time. thanks @kayousterhout for your coach.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207812
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207837
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207914
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207936
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15207983
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15208014
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15208037
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ private[spark] class PythonRDD[T: ClassTag](
override
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15208070
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15208097
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1491#issuecomment-49692220
QA tests have started for PR 1491. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16939/consoleFull
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1364
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user advancedxy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1504#discussion_r15208849
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/json/JsonRDD.scala
---
@@ -239,9 +239,9 @@ private[sql] object JsonRDD extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1472#issuecomment-49693537
QA results for PR 1472:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user colorant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#discussion_r15208983
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/SortShuffleManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user colorant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#discussion_r15209013
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/SortShuffleWriter.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1519
[bagel]unpersist old processed rdd
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/adrian-wang/spark bagelunpersist
Alternatively you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1519#issuecomment-49694004
QA tests have started for PR 1519. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16940/consoleFull
---
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49694729
If we have fixed all the problems, let's do it. We should add pep8 check to
the Jenkins scripts (in /dev/).
I'm not 100% positive whether our Jenkins instances have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49694759
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49694764
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49694965
QA tests have started for PR 1505. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16941/consoleFull
---
GitHub user dorx opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520
[SPARK-2514] [mllib] Random RDD generator
Utilities for generating random RDDs.
RandomRDD and RandomVectorRDD are created instead of using
`sc.parallelize(range:Range)` because `Range`
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#issuecomment-49695427
QA tests have started for PR 1520. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16942/consoleFull
---
Github user dorx commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#issuecomment-49695577
@falaki @jkbradley @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1491#issuecomment-49696891
QA results for PR 1491:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user rjurney commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-49697592
My data has doubles in it, could that be the issue?
Using Python version 2.7.6rc1 (v2.7.6rc1:4913d0e9be30+, Oct 27 2013
20:52:11)
SparkContext available as
Github user rjurney commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-49698081
It also looks like we need a custom function to handle the UNION type. I've
extended what you wrote for DOUBLE/FLOAT:
def unpack(value: Any, schema: Schema):
Github user gzm55 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/840#issuecomment-49698091
@codedeft could you fix the conflicts when merging into master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rjurney commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-49698499
This file, without any UNIONS, works:
https://github.com/miguno/avro-cli-examples/blob/master/twitter.snappy.avro
My data is more complex :(
---
If your project
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49698547
If we have to, we could probably somehow package `pep8` and its
dependencies as a standalone. It's doable but I think also a bit ugly and
harder to update.
As
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1519#issuecomment-49698613
QA results for PR 1519:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49698681
Let's definitely add the pep8 check in a separate PR. I'm waiting for
Jenkins to come back positive before merging this pull request.
I think it'd make sense to
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1425#issuecomment-49698702
@dbtsai I saw why `!(a~==b)` doesn't work but the question was that `!~==`
was not used in our tests except the unit tests for itself.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user nevillelyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1188#issuecomment-49698747
@andrewor14 ping again?
Rebased again and scalastyle/tests passed locally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15211059
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ private[spark] class PythonRDD[T: ClassTag](
override
Github user ericgarcia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-49699078
@rjurney Nice job adding the DOUBLE and FLOAT. I might be able to get the
UNIONS working if you post an example .avro file for me to test it with. I
neglected the data
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15211142
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -1247,15 +1262,16 @@ def combineLocally(iterator):
return combiners.iteritems()
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49699504
QA results for PR 1505:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15211313
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -297,6 +297,33 @@ class MarshalSerializer(FramedSerializer):
loads = marshal.loads
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15211390
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49699903
Merging this in master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1291#issuecomment-49699950
is there anything wrong with this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505#issuecomment-49699932
Now I've merged this, do you mind submitting a pep8 checker?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1505
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#issuecomment-49700088
QA results for PR 1520:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brtrait
Github user rjurney commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-49700443
@ericgarcia Thanks! Very exciting. An example file is here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3wy0wXNwbpRekJVaW13cGRKb1U/edit?usp=sharing
---
If your project is set up
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#discussion_r15211652
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1377#discussion_r15211673
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -382,6 +382,16 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
/td
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1056#issuecomment-49700737
Upmerged and incorporated review comments.
Also added a random sleep at the start so that the executor heartbeats are
less likely to get in sync.
---
If your
Github user kellrott closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1182
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1056#issuecomment-49700944
QA tests have started for PR 1056. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16944/consoleFull
---
Github user ianoc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1377#issuecomment-49701073
@pwendell Sounds good to me, updated as per your suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1439#issuecomment-49574159
Thank you guys, I've updated the code as suggested, and the also attached
the micro-benchmark result in the PR description.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1399#discussion_r15155941
--- Diff: bin/spark-sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1399#discussion_r15155947
--- Diff: assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -162,6 +162,11 @@
artifactIdspark-hive_${scala.binary.version}/artifactId
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1399#discussion_r15155961
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -573,4 +572,170 @@ prefixed with a tick (`'`). Implicit conversions
turn these symbols into expres
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1497#discussion_r15156055
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -152,6 +155,34 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49574913
I spoke with @aarondav, but I'm not sure we can borrow this code from Java
if it is LGPL licensed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-49574961
Are you sure about that? They're forked from Java, not from the Python
process.
If this is the case, please suggest another way to test this. We can't add
a bug
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1487#issuecomment-49575030
Jenkins, test this please. Naw this is a message from jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1487#discussion_r15156158
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49575156
He did it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/634#discussion_r15156184
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -37,14 +37,4 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1253#issuecomment-49575215
I agree, -D is for JVM options, but these are not arbitrary JVM options.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49575204
QA tests have started for PR 1502. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16898/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1487#issuecomment-49575213
QA tests have started for PR 1487. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16899/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1487#issuecomment-49575273
Don't have a ton of time to look ATM but I kicked off the tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/634#discussion_r15156221
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1507
SPARK-2565. Update ShuffleReadMetrics as blocks are fetched
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sryza/spark sandy-spark-2565
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1508
[SPARK-2103][Streaming] Change to ClassTag for KafkaInputDStream and fix
reflection issue
This PR updates previous Manifest for KafkaInputDStream's Decoder to
ClassTag, also fix the problem
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1507#issuecomment-49575625
QA tests have started for PR 1507. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16901/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1508#issuecomment-49575634
QA tests have started for PR 1508. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16900/consoleFull
---
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49575933
In light of that minor issue, I have ported an Apache v2 Timsort (from the
Android repos). It's a bit longer, but far more performant (roughly twice as
fast!)
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49576105
QA tests have started for PR 1502. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16902/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#issuecomment-49576209
QA results for PR 1440:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.brbrFor more
information see test
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49576500
Hey Aaron, make sure you add a note in the LICENSE file saying this part of
the code is from Android (similar to the other notes there).
---
If your project is set up
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49576760
BTW the API looks good to me! Actually it might allow more efficient ways
to keep track of the partition ID for each key in my case too.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#issuecomment-49576854
QA results for PR 1440:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1463#issuecomment-49576941
@pwendell The reason I did this is, if you compile a file A.scala with
contents
```scala
@SomeAnnotation
object A
```
it will produce two class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1439#issuecomment-49577438
QA results for PR 1439:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.brbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1502#issuecomment-49577557
QA tests have started for PR 1502. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16903/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-49577963
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1508#issuecomment-49577894
Nice one Jerry! this actually enables using Kafka with non-String data in
Java.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1253#issuecomment-49577965
Good points. I meant triaging all -D options but yes those then have very
'local' semantics.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-49577994
Actually I see there are some doctests that I missed earlier, maybe that's
okay. Though last time it failed Jenkins...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-49578184
QA tests have started for PR 1371. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16906/consoleFull
---
201 - 300 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
