Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4325#issuecomment-72601441
[Test build #26617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26617/consoleFull)
for PR 4325 at commit
[`096e20d`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324#discussion_r23985360
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.scala ---
@@ -15,112 +15,116 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4325
[SPARK-4508] [SQL] build native date type to conform behavior to Hive
The previous #3732 is reverted due to some test failure.
Have fixed that.
You can merge this pull request into a Git rep
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72601030
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72600859
[Test build #26616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26616/consoleFull)
for PR 4210 at commit
[`223f579`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72600720
[Test build #26615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26615/consoleFull)
for PR 4215 at commit
[`9dae87f`](https://githu
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-72600510
I can not get these tests to run, not sure if there is a way to run them
that I do not know. Please see jira for related comment.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72600391
Based on a suggestion from @rxin, I've expanded the Javadoc comment to
explain why this needs to be a _Java_ concrete class and not a Scala one (the
problem is that def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324#issuecomment-72600182
[Test build #26614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26614/consoleFull)
for PR 4324 at commit
[`87dd537`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324#issuecomment-72600186
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324#issuecomment-72600044
[Test build #26614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26614/consoleFull)
for PR 4324 at commit
[`87dd537`](https://githu
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#discussion_r23985067
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +501,195 @@ object SparkSubmit {
}
}
+/** Provides u
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72600046
@jkbradley Both setter and getter are public methods and hence both of them
should have JavaDoc. I prefer doc the default value in setter because it is
used when a user wa
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72599896
cc scheduler czars also... @kayousterhout @markhamstra
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23985029
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/impl/PeriodicGraphCheckpointer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324#discussion_r23984946
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/JavaTaskCompletionListenerImpl.java ---
@@ -15,9 +15,10 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4324
[SPARK-5549] Define TaskContext interface in Scala.
So the interface documentation shows up in ScalaDoc.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#discussion_r23984864
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +501,195 @@ object SparkSubmit {
}
}
+/** Provide
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72598548
@JoshRosen I actually don't know what we are missing. I think it only
requires testing, because the directory structure (backslashes instead of
slashes) and command-line p
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72598196
For any resource, it will try from the highest locality. TaskSetManager
checks the current lowest locality level's wait is non-zero to determine the
allowed lowest localit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72597824
@brkyvz I see that one of the TODOS is for adding Windows compatibility.
Beyond the additions to the shell script command-line parsing, what features
are we missing fo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4304#issuecomment-72597489
[Test build #26613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26613/consoleFull)
for PR 4304 at commit
[`d2a22cf`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72597256
I took a pass through this, but I'll admit that I'm a little out of my
depth w.r.t. scheduler internals here. I think that I understand the goals /
invariants of the s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72597115
[Test build #26612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26612/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
[`6b13824`](https://githu
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r23984210
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
* Get the
Github user catap commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4304#discussion_r23984199
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/PCA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) und
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#issuecomment-72596740
[Test build #26611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26611/consoleFull)
for PR 4289 at commit
[`12d800d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72596551
[Test build #26610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26610/consoleFull)
for PR 4147 at commit
[`6cf5972`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72596553
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4322#issuecomment-72596428
Was already fixed by #3832
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72596416
[Test build #26610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26610/consoleFull)
for PR 4147 at commit
[`6cf5972`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72596412
[Test build #26609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26609/consoleFull)
for PR 4210 at commit
[`ecdfaed`](https://githu
Github user harishreedharan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3642#issuecomment-72596330
@zsxwing if we merge this one, are there any other usecases for importing
SparkContext._ ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4111#issuecomment-72596355
I'm going to merge this in a little bit unless there's any additional
feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72596303
Since nobody seems to have any objections to the naming, and since it's an
easy API to support going forward, I'm going to merge this soon.
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#issuecomment-72596283
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4210#issuecomment-72596241
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#issuecomment-72596278
[Test build #26602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26602/consoleFull)
for PR 4289 at commit
[`63d170a`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3642#discussion_r23983874
--- Diff:
graphx/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/ShortestPathsSuite.scala ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ class ShortestPathsSuite extends FunSuite with
LocalS
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4019
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72596059
[Test build #26608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26608/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
[`3db1539`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4019#issuecomment-72596001
Thanks. I'm merging this into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#discussion_r23983783
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -262,8 +262,14 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#discussion_r23983767
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -175,7 +175,10 @@ case class EqualTo(left: Expression, r
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4059#issuecomment-72595692
[Test build #26607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26607/consoleFull)
for PR 4059 at commit
[`c973ab3`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-72595661
@ScrapCodes can we close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72595427
[Test build #26605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26605/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
[`1c98881`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72595431
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72595205
[Test build #26601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26601/consoleFull)
for PR 4308 at commit
[`bcb3ad6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72595209
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72595153
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72595151
[Test build #26604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26604/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
[`142372a`](https://gith
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4322#issuecomment-72594903
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4322#issuecomment-72595073
[Test build #26606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26606/consoleFull)
for PR 4322 at commit
[`ea2d490`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72595022
[Test build #574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/574/consoleFull)
for PR 4047 at commit
[`589728b`](https://github
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72594975
Test failure with system...will test again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3850#issuecomment-72594814
What do we do with this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72594750
[Test build #26605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26605/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
[`1c98881`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3820#issuecomment-72594576
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3820#issuecomment-72594570
[Test build #26597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26597/consoleFull)
for PR 3820 at commit
[`b1e2a0d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72594425
[Test build #26604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26604/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
[`142372a`](https://githu
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23983277
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,174 @@ object KafkaUtils {
createStrea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72594403
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#discussion_r23983233
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -490,4 +489,55 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4316
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4316#issuecomment-72594192
Thanks. I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4306#issuecomment-72594005
[Test build #26599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26599/consoleFull)
for PR 4306 at commit
[`5c2c70b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4306#issuecomment-72594009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4319
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4323#issuecomment-72593339
@JoshRosen sounds good. In the mean time I'll likely still pull this in,
since it's blocking perf testing and some other stuff.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user FlytxtRnD commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4059#discussion_r23982975
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -285,6 +286,59 @@ class PythonMLLibAPI extends Serializable {
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72593275
@mengxr Oops, that commit hid some of my responses to your feedback above.
The 2 issues remaining are (1) Who is responsible for materializing graphs?
and (2) Where s
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4319#issuecomment-72593258
Just an internal clean-up, so I'm gonna pull this in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4321#issuecomment-72593149
[Test build #26598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26598/consoleFull)
for PR 4321 at commit
[`e840acf`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4321#issuecomment-72593154
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3903#discussion_r23982799
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterActor.scala ---
@@ -52,11 +52,7 @@ class BlockManagerMasterActor(val isLocal: Boo
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4059#discussion_r23982793
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -86,6 +89,98 @@ def train(cls, rdd, k, maxIterations=100, runs=1,
initializationMode="k-means||"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72592738
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72592729
[Test build #26600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26600/consoleFull)
for PR 4233 at commit
[`ee99228`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72592529
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4319#issuecomment-72592475
[Test build #26594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26594/consoleFull)
for PR 4319 at commit
[`dfe7ed9`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72592525
[Test build #26591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26591/consoleFull)
for PR 4308 at commit
[`a760555`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4319#issuecomment-72592486
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72592281
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72592274
[Test build #26593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26593/consoleFull)
for PR 3798 at commit
[`8991017`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72591879
@mengxr Almost done with updating per your feedback, but 1 question: Do
you recommend doc only in the setter methods, or in both the getters and
setters?
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#issuecomment-72591570
[Test build #26602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26602/consoleFull)
for PR 4289 at commit
[`63d170a`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4296#issuecomment-72591497
[Test build #26587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26587/consoleFull)
for PR 4296 at commit
[`6527b86`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4296#issuecomment-72591503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23982202
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4323#issuecomment-72590948
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4321#issuecomment-72590922
@mengxr LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-72590949
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4323#issuecomment-72590944
[Test build #26589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26589/consoleFull)
for PR 4323 at commit
[`d8669da`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-72590945
[Test build #26586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26586/consoleFull)
for PR 4186 at commit
[`adc8311`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23982107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/impl/PeriodicGraphCheckpointer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-72590366
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-72590357
[Test build #26584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26584/consoleFull)
for PR 4186 at commit
[`2783aed`](https://gith
101 - 200 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
