Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4981#issuecomment-78287031
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4142#discussion_r26227193
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4142#discussion_r26231839
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4981#issuecomment-78294531
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r26228790
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,370 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
GitHub user mgdadv opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4982
Dotname
Check for . in data frame schame/column name, print a warning and replace
the . with an _.
The . is used as class/method separator in Python .
You can merge this pull request into
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4982#issuecomment-78286884
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4965#issuecomment-78305952
[Test build #28475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28475/consoleFull)
for PR 4965 at commit
Github user ilganeli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4965#issuecomment-78305887
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4981#issuecomment-78287009
[Test build #28474 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28474/consoleFull)
for PR 4981 at commit
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4965#discussion_r26230494
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/SortShuffleWriter.scala ---
@@ -88,7 +88,13 @@ private[spark] class SortShuffleWriter[K, V, C](
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-78305260
@srowen Sorry missed your notification, opened a JIRA now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4986#issuecomment-78360647
[Test build #28481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28481/consoleFull)
for PR 4986 at commit
Github user leahmcguire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#discussion_r26256579
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -35,26 +39,30 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4699#issuecomment-78374902
[Test build #28484 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28484/consoleFull)
for PR 4699 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4986#issuecomment-78377018
[Test build #28481 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28481/consoleFull)
for PR 4986 at commit
Github user leahmcguire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#discussion_r26258688
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -262,4 +303,58 @@ object NaiveBayes {
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78364659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78370068
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4986#issuecomment-78377037
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user leahmcguire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-78381145
@jkbradley thanks for the comments! I have implemented everything except
the two inline comments that I replied to directly.
I'm not clear about how you want the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78364402
[Test build #28479 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28479/consoleFull)
for PR 4895 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78364419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78372979
[Test build #28482 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28482/consoleFull)
for PR 4985 at commit
GitHub user MechCoder opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4986
[SPARK-5987] [MLlib] Save/load for GaussianMixtureModels
Should be self explanatory.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4986#issuecomment-78360616
cc: @mengxr @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78314331
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78346565
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78370048
[Test build #28480 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28480/consoleFull)
for PR 4895 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4944#discussion_r26256855
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -71,30 +73,54 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78373938
[Test build #28483 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28483/consoleFull)
for PR 4985 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4944#discussion_r26260907
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -71,30 +73,54 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26236670
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ import scala.language.existentials
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78316744
[Test build #28476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28476/consoleFull)
for PR 4985 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4964#issuecomment-78319536
I was just discussing this w/ Hari a bit, the one issue w/ this PR is
having a test case to demonstrate the old problem, verify the fix, prevent
regression. We have our
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4956#issuecomment-78342013
[Test build #28477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28477/consoleFull)
for PR 4956 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78315442
The code plainly compiles in master, as you can see from Jenkins builds.
What are you compiling?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ChetanBhasin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78317616
Right away.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#issuecomment-78315443
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26237198
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ReceiverSuite.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +332,27 @@ class ReceiverSuite extends TestSuiteBase with
Github user ChetanBhasin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4965#issuecomment-78335321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4944#issuecomment-78342955
This looks like the right thing to do. Thanks for submitting this!
@ash211 @MingyuKim care to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26236576
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContextImpl.scala ---
@@ -66,8 +66,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskContextImpl(
/** Marks the task
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4956#issuecomment-78356360
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user ChetanBhasin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983
Added import for Spark Context
Added import for Spark Context so that methods such as reduceByKey may work.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user ChetanBhasin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78316490
Oh! I see. I might have messed up a few files between different versions on
my end.
I'll recheck the code on my end. Sorry for the useless request.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78347963
[Test build #28478 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28478/consoleFull)
for PR 4895 at commit
Github user ChetanBhasin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78315245
Actually no, it doesn't. This is what I got when I tried it without imports:
/mllib/fpm/FPGrowth.scala:131: value reduceByKey is not a member of
GitHub user dragos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984
[MESOS][SPARK-6287] Add dynamic allocation to the coarse-grained Mesos
scheduler
This is largely based on extracting the dynamic allocation parts from
@tnachen's #3861.
You can merge this
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26236828
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ReceiverSuite.scala ---
@@ -129,6 +130,41 @@ class ReceiverSuite extends TestSuiteBase with
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26236688
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +297,14 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4983#issuecomment-78317327
OK. Mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4965#issuecomment-78334698
[Test build #28475 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28475/consoleFull)
for PR 4965 at commit
Github user ilganeli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78348599
Hi @nchammas, I believe I've resolved the issues I had with the code and
I've added a test case to the RDDPairFunctionsSuite that checks that the files
were created and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4895#issuecomment-78353494
[Test build #28480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28480/consoleFull)
for PR 4895 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#discussion_r26237173
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ReceiverSuite.scala ---
@@ -129,6 +130,41 @@ class ReceiverSuite extends TestSuiteBase with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78389759
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4972#discussion_r26265216
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ArrayReflect.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
Hm, yes we could. Scala
GitHub user lustefaniak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4989
[SPARK-6297] EventLog permissions are always set to 770 which causes
problems
By default permissions are set to 770, which in some cases is more
problematic than relying on umask.
If
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-78407056
@advancedxy Do the tests pass on your local machine ? It looks the
ExternalSorter uses a size-tracking hash map which in turn depends on the
SizeEstimator. So I am
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4987
[SPARK-6294] fix hang when call take() in JVM on PythonRDD
The Thread.interrupt() can not terminate the thread in some cases, so we
should not wait for the writerThread of PythonRDD.
This
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4988#issuecomment-78404792
[Test build #28488 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28488/consoleFull)
for PR 4988 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4989#issuecomment-78406084
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-78406716
[Test build #28486 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28486/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-78406725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4273#issuecomment-78384266
Mind tagging this [GRAPHX] so it can get sorted properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4286#issuecomment-78384187
@brkyvz mind tagging this [MLLIB] so it can get sorted properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4944#discussion_r26262063
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -71,30 +73,54 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-78386542
@Lewuathe mind placing [MLLIB] in the title so that this can get sorted
properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3782#issuecomment-78386436
@maropu mind including [GRAPHX] in the title so that this can get sorted
properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user industrial-sloth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3858#issuecomment-78387422
@sryza No problem, done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4956#discussion_r26262942
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1327,6 +1420,178 @@ Note that the connections in the pool should be
lazily created on demand and tim
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3234#issuecomment-78388389
Mind tagging this with [GRAPHX] so it can get sorted properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-78389593
[Test build #28485 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28485/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78389755
[Test build #28482 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28482/consoleFull)
for PR 4985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-78401317
[Test build #28486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28486/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4987#issuecomment-78402380
[Test build #28487 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28487/consoleFull)
for PR 4987 at commit
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3888#issuecomment-78385690
@saucam if this is going to stay open, mind tagging it with [SQL] so it
gets sorted properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4956#discussion_r26262224
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1327,6 +1420,178 @@ Note that the connections in the pool should be
lazily created on demand and tim
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4830#discussion_r26263292
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -109,7 +111,8 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4699#issuecomment-78388981
[Test build #28484 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28484/consoleFull)
for PR 4699 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4699#issuecomment-78388992
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-78400178
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-78400160
[Test build #28485 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28485/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user DoingDone9 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4907
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DoingDone9 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4907#issuecomment-78404973
yes i will close it @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4956#discussion_r26271367
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1327,6 +1420,178 @@ Note that the connections in the pool should be
lazily created on demand and tim
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4944#discussion_r26261715
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -71,30 +73,54 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78389244
[Test build #28483 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28483/consoleFull)
for PR 4985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4985#issuecomment-78389258
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user vlyubin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4988
[SPARK-6296] Added equals to Column
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vlyubin/spark columncomp
Alternatively you can review and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4975#issuecomment-78209601
[Test build #28463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28463/consoleFull)
for PR 4975 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-78209607
**[Test build #28459 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28459/consoleFull)**
for PR 4135 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-78209621
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4961#issuecomment-78214522
Looks like it is a difference between Maven and SBT, `run-tests` script
package the jars using maven do not generate kafka-assembly fat jar. I'm going
to find out a
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4906#discussion_r26192410
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/loss/Loss.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +49,14 @@ trait Loss extends Serializable {
*/
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4978#issuecomment-78218757
[Test build #28465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28465/consoleFull)
for PR 4978 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#issuecomment-78219718
Okay cool - LGTM I will pull this in. I just did some local sanity tests,
built with Maven and ran (a few) Maven tests. We'll need to keep any eye on the
Maven build
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4975#issuecomment-78216043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
