Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6908#issuecomment-113626980
[Test build #35314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35314/consoleFull)
for PR 6908 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-113629316
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-113629287
[Test build #35309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35309/console)
for PR 5748 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6907#issuecomment-113632888
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113634569
[Test build #35320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35320/consoleFull)
for PR 6888 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113637840
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113637801
[Test build #35307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35307/console)
for PR 6876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113643422
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113643472
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32872490
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113654119
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113656046
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113656013
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113656030
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6829#issuecomment-113656100
I see. So the Kafka is present only through the flume-kafka-source
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.flume.flume-ng-sources/flume-kafka-source/1.6.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113661246
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113661226
[Test build #35319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35319/console)
for PR 6888 at commit
Github user potix2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4269#issuecomment-113661417
Sorry to confuse you, I agree with you. As a first step, we should rewrite
run-tests in Python, then append new features.
I took a look at #6866, I think it has
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113673700
[Test build #941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/941/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113675079
Thanks! I am merging it to master and branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6883#issuecomment-113629566
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113629487
[Test build #35311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35311/console)
for PR 6905 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113629511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113632909
[Test build #35319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35319/consoleFull)
for PR 6888 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113642553
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113642670
[Test build #35321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35321/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113642575
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799#issuecomment-113645291
[Test build #940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/940/consoleFull)
for PR 6799 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#discussion_r32869361
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/decimal/DecimalSuite.scala
---
@@ -162,4 +162,9 @@ class DecimalSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32869380
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32869403
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#discussion_r32871422
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -360,7 +367,7 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#discussion_r32871383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -313,10 +314,16 @@ private[parquet] class RowWriteSupport
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6889#issuecomment-113650123
LGTM, waiting for tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6908#issuecomment-113651550
[Test build #35314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35314/console)
for PR 6908 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6889#issuecomment-113656892
[Test build #35316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35316/console)
for PR 6889 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6848#issuecomment-113657049
[Test build #35330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35330/consoleFull)
for PR 6848 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6889#issuecomment-113656998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113657139
[Test build #35331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35331/consoleFull)
for PR 6632 at commit
GitHub user harishreedharan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910
[SPARK-8483][Streaming] Remove commons-lang3 dependency from Flume Siâ¦
â¦nk. Also bump Flume version to 1.6.0
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6889
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#discussion_r32876062
--- Diff:
external/flume-sink/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/sink/SparkAvroCallbackHandler.scala
---
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ private[flume]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674331
[Test build #35328 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35328/console)
for PR 6909 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674309
[Test build #35327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35327/console)
for PR 6909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113677840
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113677726
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113676707
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6908#discussion_r32864207
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -326,6 +326,27 @@ def between(self, lowerBound, upperBound):
return (self =
Github user rtreffer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-113629961
I've pushed the hive generated parquet file and I'll call it a day.
I think I'll have to relax the validation of column types for DECIMAL.
---
If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113632149
@yhuai updated to avoid changing equality behavior.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113635239
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6895#issuecomment-113638271
Closing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6895
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6901#discussion_r32867731
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1144,9 +1144,11 @@ generate these on the reduce side. When data does
not fit in memory Spark will s
to disk,
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113645504
Just a couple of more comments on the tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3858#issuecomment-113648094
That gives me some context. We are adding more stuff to the python API for
parity with Scala and Java. We have added full Kafka Python API, Flume is
being added, and
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113652053
@marmbrus @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#discussion_r32872239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -21,19 +21,31 @@ import java.sql.Timestamp
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6829#issuecomment-113652186
I dont see a dependency on Kafka in Flume 1.4.0
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.flume/flume-ng-sdk/1.4.0
What am i missing?
On Fri, Jun
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113652204
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32872739
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#discussion_r32872749
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -21,19 +21,31 @@ import java.sql.Timestamp
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113656191
[Test build #35329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35329/consoleFull)
for PR 6632 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6707#issuecomment-113656399
Thank you very much for this patch. This was a very important one,
especially the tests.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, asfgit notificati...@github.com wrote:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#issuecomment-113663947
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113669127
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113669074
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670190
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670244
[Test build #35337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35337/consoleFull)
for PR 5717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670198
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113675867
[Test build #35339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35339/consoleFull)
for PR 6911 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113676454
@yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113676455
[Test build #35329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35329/console)
for PR 6632 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912
[SPARK-6749] [SQL] Make metastore client robust to underlying socket
connection loss
This works around a bug in the underlying RetryingMetaStoreClient
(HIVE-10384) by refreshing the metastore client
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6883#issuecomment-113630110
[Test build #35315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35315/consoleFull)
for PR 6883 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-113630096
So the JIRA was about updating the examples actually. Its great that you
have updated the docs AND the tests, but it would ideal if the examples
DirectKafkaWordCount and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6906#issuecomment-113632802
[Test build #35318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35318/consoleFull)
for PR 6906 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6907#issuecomment-113632842
[Test build #35304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35304/console)
for PR 6907 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6782#discussion_r32867754
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113644879
[Test build #35310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35310/console)
for PR 6632 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32869331
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113644969
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#discussion_r32869329
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Decimal.scala ---
@@ -286,6 +288,9 @@ object Decimal {
/** Maximum number of decimal
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113647862
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113647849
[Test build #35321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35321/console)
for PR 6759 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6715#issuecomment-113648863
[Test build #35312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35312/console)
for PR 6715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6715#issuecomment-113648895
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5375#issuecomment-113648887
This is not needed any more as Spark 1.4.0 has fixed this issue. Mind
closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6829#issuecomment-113653289
That looks like just the API module. I suspect it comes via the actual
implementation such as in
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#discussion_r32872412
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -313,10 +314,16 @@ private[parquet] class RowWriteSupport
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5834#discussion_r32873174
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6829#issuecomment-113659788
Yes, all of the libs in the flume-ng/lib directory gets added to the
classpath, so scala would get added to the classpath, but get loaded only as
required
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113659586
[Test build #35332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35332/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113661550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113661524
[Test build #35320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35320/console)
for PR 6888 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113668048
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113670534
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113670505
[Test build #35322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35322/console)
for PR 6876 at commit
1 - 100 of 1062 matches
Mail list logo
