Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119471716
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-119476219
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-119476309
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6880#issuecomment-119486668
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7284#issuecomment-119494214
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#issuecomment-119494142
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zhangjiajin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#discussion_r34127138
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/Prefixspan.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119501803
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-119501809
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119501683
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119510741
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064#issuecomment-119510789
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119510764
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119510866
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119510872
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064#issuecomment-119510878
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119511131
No problem. It works :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119516684
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119516676
[Test build #36779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36779/console)
for PR 7258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119526680
[Test build #36780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36780/consoleFull)
for PR 6743 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#discussion_r34131472
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -544,38 +544,60 @@ private[master] class Master(
* has enough cores
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119538858
[Test build #36775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36775/console)
for PR 7208 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119538892
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119546000
[Test build #36785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36785/console)
for PR 7258 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119547913
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#discussion_r34138865
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user zhangjiajin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119547968
@feynmanliang findPatternsLengthOne and getPatternsWithPrefix do the
similar work, but the input data type is different. findPatternsLengthOne faces
the entire RDD
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285#discussion_r34137453
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoalescedRDD.scala ---
@@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ private[spark] class CoalescedRDD[T: ClassTag](
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#discussion_r34137302
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#issuecomment-119547061
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#issuecomment-119546905
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#discussion_r34139262
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -199,23 +199,23 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6262#issuecomment-119549951
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r34139551
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -275,6 +276,24 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119553717
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user sun-rui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7287
[SPARK-8894][SPARKR][DOC] Example code errors in SparkR documentation.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sun-rui/spark SPARK-8894
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-119556562
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user megatron-me-uk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6262#issuecomment-119549489
I have changed the implementation of the optional parameter to a boolean
`checkCode` and updated the docstring to reflect that.
---
If your project is set up
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-119553009
Is `soundex` a common function for string? If not, I think we should move
related code to the soundex expression.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-119555878
[Test build #36783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36783/console)
for PR 7259 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-119555907
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-119556023
I removed spaces around imports (can't this be checked by ScalaStyle?).
I noticed a few tests are looping on 2.11 (both on 2.11.6 and 2.11.7). I'll
investigate
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7287#issuecomment-119558323
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zhangjiajin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119564959
About the parallel method, I think method 2 performance is better than
method 1.
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#discussion_r34136638
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -199,23 +199,23 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7286#issuecomment-119543465
[Test build #36784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36784/console)
for PR 7286 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#issuecomment-119547051
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-119554631
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119554599
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HuJiayin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-119555834
@cloud-fan The soundex is a common string encode function. You could find
definition from wiki page. The original implementation in Apache common doesn't
implement the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064#issuecomment-119540851
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064#issuecomment-119540780
[Test build #36778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36778/console)
for PR 5064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119542475
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7286#issuecomment-119540393
[Test build #36784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36784/consoleFull)
for PR 7286 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119539675
[Test build #36785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36785/consoleFull)
for PR 7258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-119550063
[Test build #1006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1006/console)
for PR 6903 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119559185
The unit test failure:
[info] - Single command with -e *** FAILED *** (2 minutes, 18 seconds)
[info] java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Futures timed out
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7286#issuecomment-119543512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119546057
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119547772
[Test build #36777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36777/console)
for PR 7280 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119547878
[Test build #36780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36780/console)
for PR 6743 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-119547804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#issuecomment-119548360
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-119558510
Yes, it can be. But enforcing it codebase wide is huge(+ unjustified, in
the sense it affect code history) effort.
See :
Github user dibbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6990#discussion_r34142320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -833,8 +833,10 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
logDebug(Put
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119471364
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6919#issuecomment-119477645
Sorry need some time to think about this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119477063
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7282#issuecomment-119505110
[Test build #36763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36763/console)
for PR 7282 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7284#issuecomment-119507942
[Test build #36772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36772/console)
for PR 7284 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119513877
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119513830
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#discussion_r34132604
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ADTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-119530772
[Test build #1006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1006/consoleFull)
for PR 6903 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119533447
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119533465
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#discussion_r34134630
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -544,38 +544,60 @@ private[master] class Master(
* has enough
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119535362
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7283#issuecomment-119535270
[Test build #36776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36776/console)
for PR 7283 at commit
GitHub user darabos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285
[SPARK-8893] Add runtime checks against non-positive number of partitions
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8893
What does `sc.parallelize(1 to 3).repartition(p).collect` return?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-119539187
[Test build #36783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36783/consoleFull)
for PR 7259 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7286
[SPARK-8068] [MLlib] Add confusionMatrix method at class MulticlassMetrics
in pyspark/mllib
Add confusionMatrix method at class MulticlassMetrics in pyspark/mllib
You can merge this pull
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7209#discussion_r34122206
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetSchemaSuite.scala
---
@@ -478,11 +478,12 @@ class ParquetSchemaSuite extends
Github user zhangjiajin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#discussion_r34123210
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixspanSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119485728
[Test build #36770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36770/consoleFull)
for PR 7208 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-119485586
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-119503215
[Test build #36774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36774/consoleFull)
for PR 7259 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064
[SPARK-5523][Core][Streaming] Add a cache for hostname in TaskMetrics to
decrease the memory usage and GC overhead
Hostname in TaskMetrics will be created through deserialization, mostly the
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5064#issuecomment-119508679
Hi @tdas and @andrewor14 , I tested a lot on the memory consumption of
`TaskMetrics` and related `_hostname` string.
Here I use `DirectKafkaWordCount` as test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119516043
[Test build #36779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36779/consoleFull)
for PR 7258 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119519835
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-119519707
[Test build #36765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36765/console)
for PR 6743 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#discussion_r34132525
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +158,32 @@ object Statistics {
def chiSqTest(data:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#discussion_r34132481
--- Diff: docs/mllib-statistics.md ---
@@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ featureTestResults.foreach { result =
div data-lang=java markdown=1
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-119531286
[Test build #36770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36770/console)
for PR 7208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119534503
[Test build #36782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36782/console)
for PR 7258 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119534512
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632#issuecomment-119534801
[Test build #1007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1007/console)
for PR 5632 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7258#issuecomment-119537202
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 1372 matches
Mail list logo
