Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132427697
[Test build #41198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41198/consoleFull)
for PR 8266 at commit
[`8a1fa07`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132427480
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132427479
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132427461
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132427459
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132427259
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8168#issuecomment-132427026
[Test build #1660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1660/console)
for PR 8168 at commit
[`7f20e19`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132426952
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132426940
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#discussion_r37375336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -122,7 +123,15 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8298#issuecomment-132426939
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8298
[SPARK-10100] [SQL] Perfomance improvements to new MIN/MAX aggregate
functions.
The new MIN/MAX suffer from a performance regression. This PR aims to fix
this by simplifying the evaluation of th
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132426562
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132426163
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132426162
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132419456
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132419364
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-132418585
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132418520
LGTM. Will merge when tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132418318
@shivaram thank you for reviewing and merging it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-132418166
@sun-rui We can do the `createDataFrame` in another PR, but for this PR can
we add a test case using a JSON file which has an `ArrayType` in it ?
---
If your project i
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8218#issuecomment-132418179
Let's try pinging a couple of people. @rxin @aarondav
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132418073
[Test build #41196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41196/consoleFull)
for PR 8294 at commit
[`36e7836`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132417968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132417967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132417896
[Test build #41195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41195/console)
for PR 8297 at commit
[`b3ff9f0`](https://github.
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132417749
Ok cool. I'll merge this first after Jenkins passes and then we can retest
#7833.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8280#issuecomment-132417459
@shivaram Sure. Just updated the JIRA description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132417409
Right. However, I thought we should isolate the validation problem for
#7883. So I reverted it on other PR under review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132417326
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132417314
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-132416917
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-132416914
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#discussion_r37374083
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -163,3 +163,17 @@ setMethod("n", signature(x = "Column"),
function(x) {
count(x)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-132416671
[Test build #41174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41174/console)
for PR 7629 at commit
[`e3585ec`](https://github.
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132416477
LGTM. I thought this was a part of some other open PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8280
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8280#issuecomment-132415909
Ok - lets leave it on in master and I'll work with @mateiz on changes to
move this to ShuffleRDD and capture more use cases. @yhuai could you put in the
query you ran i
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8168#issuecomment-132415769
[Test build #1659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1659/console)
for PR 8168 at commit
[`7f20e19`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132415613
[Test build #41195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41195/consoleFull)
for PR 8297 at commit
[`b3ff9f0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132415238
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8280#issuecomment-132415200
Let's close this one.
@shivaram can you submit a proper fix for master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132415237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132415115
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#discussion_r37373631
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: StreamingContex
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296#issuecomment-132415166
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132415135
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132415170
[Test build #41176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41176/console)
for PR 8156 at commit
[`d1d33ca`](https://github.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#discussion_r37373582
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: StreamingContex
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297#issuecomment-132414939
@shivaram could you review it, please? Thank you for your continuous
support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296#issuecomment-132414842
[Test build #41194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41194/consoleFull)
for PR 8296 at commit
[`90b25a3`](https://gith
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414870
Thanks @vanzin :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user yu-iskw opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8297
[SparkR][Minor] Get rid of a long line warning
```
R/functions.R:74:1: style: lines should not be more than 100 characters.
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions", "li
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414708
Merged to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296#issuecomment-132414617
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414612
All the yarn tests ran and passed, so I'm gonna merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296#issuecomment-132414636
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8280#issuecomment-132414515
I created https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296 to change the default
setting to false for branch 1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132414569
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132414504
[Test build #41190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41190/console)
for PR 8266 at commit
[`3280eeb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132414568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8296
[SPARK-10087] [CORE] [BRANCH-1.5] Disable
spark.shuffle.reduceLocality.enabled by default.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10087
In some cases, when spark.shuffle.reduceLocality.e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414452
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414454
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8192#issuecomment-132414343
**[Test build #41170 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41170/console)**
for PR 8192 at commit
[`07a4e4f`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132413839
[Test build #41193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41193/consoleFull)
for PR 8200 at commit
[`5c8e3db`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412896
[Test build #41192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41192/consoleFull)
for PR 8295 at commit
[`a3e4758`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132412166
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132412204
Fired a new JIRA since this is a bug in the main codes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412156
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412165
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132412159
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#discussion_r37372885
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#discussion_r37372853
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -163,3 +163,17 @@ setMethod("n", signature(x = "Column"),
function(x) {
count(x)
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295
[SPARK-10093][SPARK-10096][SQL] Avoid transformation on executors & fix
UDFS on complex types
This is kind of a weird case, but given a sufficiently complex query plan
(in this case a TungstenProject
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132411772
[Test build #41191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41191/consoleFull)
for PR 8294 at commit
[`c1a6126`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8289#issuecomment-132411751
**[Test build #1657 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1657/console)**
for PR 8289 at commit
[`3545d1e`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132411260
[Test build #41190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41190/consoleFull)
for PR 8266 at commit
[`3280eeb`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-13241
BTW, other usages of `isTrackerStarted` are right because they are in the
`synchronized` body.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132410903
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8242#issuecomment-132410906
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8242#issuecomment-132410904
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294#issuecomment-132410881
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132410731
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8242#issuecomment-132410796
[Test build #41183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41183/console)
for PR 8242 at commit
[`ca08e97`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132410732
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132410728
[Test build #41189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41189/console)
for PR 8287 at commit
[`b82d46f`](https://github.
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8294
[SPARK-9504][Streaming]Fix a race condition that startReceiver may happen
before setting trackerState to Started
Test failure:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spark-Master-Maven-with-YAR
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#discussion_r37372413
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -163,3 +163,17 @@ setMethod("n", signature(x = "Column"),
function(x) {
count(x)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132410508
[Test build #41189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41189/consoleFull)
for PR 8287 at commit
[`b82d46f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132410324
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132410336
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132410178
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132409846
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8287#issuecomment-132409835
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132409540
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132409541
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
201 - 300 of 1172 matches
Mail list logo
