Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8764#discussion_r39485102
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/SampleNode.scala
---
@@ -51,18 +50,15 @@ case class SampleNode(
overri
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8765#issuecomment-140318121
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8765#issuecomment-140318095
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8764#issuecomment-140318100
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8764#issuecomment-140318120
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user liyezhang556520 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8765
[SPARK-10608][CORE] disable reduce locality as default
for details, pls refer to
[SPARK-10608](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10608)
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8764#issuecomment-140317867
@zsxwing please have a look in the mean time. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8764
[SPARK-10613] [SQL] Reduce LocalNode tests dependency on SQLContext
This is WIP. The remaining tasks include:
- Fix `TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite`, where tests are currently ignored
- Do `Ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8711#issuecomment-140316999
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8711#issuecomment-140317053
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140316430
[Test build #42476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42476/consoleFull)
for PR 8101 at commit
[`fbc471b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8763#issuecomment-140316096
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user mingyukim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8763
SPARK-10611 Clone Configuration for each task for NewHadoopRDD
This patch attempts to fix the Hadoop Configuration thread safety issue for
NewHadoopRDD in the same way SPARK-2546 fixed the issue f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140315318
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140315305
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viesti commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-140315329
Trying this out by compiling current master (at the time of writing
`a2249359d5b0368318a714b292bb1d0dc70c0e27`) with mesos 0.23.0 and 0.24.0 and I
got the following error
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8762#issuecomment-140315300
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140315135
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8762
[DOCS] Small fixes to Spark on Yarn doc
* a follow-up to 16b6d18613e150c7038c613992d80a7828413e66 as
`--num-executors` flag is not suppported.
* links + formatting
You can merge this pul
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350#issuecomment-140312928
I think that's reasonable since the only failure mode this patch should
cause is MiMa failure and that passed now. Thanks @pwendell for reminding me
about the previousVer
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8761#issuecomment-140312703
[Test build #42475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42475/consoleFull)
for PR 8761 at commit
[`f2d4a1d`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350#issuecomment-140312292
Alright I'm going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8761#issuecomment-140312011
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8761#issuecomment-140312029
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350#issuecomment-140311671
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350#issuecomment-140311669
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8350#issuecomment-140311598
[Test build #42469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42469/console)
for PR 8350 at commit
[`2178d25`](https://github.
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8761
[SPARK-10612][SQL] Add prepare to LocalNode.
The idea is that we should separate the function call that does memory
reservation (i.e. prepare) from the function call that consumes the input (e.g.
open
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140307899
[Test build #42474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42474/consoleFull)
for PR 8101 at commit
[`fbc471b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140307135
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140307202
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140306774
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user falaki commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8745#issuecomment-140305112
+1 for making it configurable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140304247
[Test build #42473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42473/consoleFull)
for PR 8101 at commit
[`fbc471b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140304055
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140304040
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8740#issuecomment-140303368
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8740#issuecomment-140303373
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8740#issuecomment-140303259
[Test build #42472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42472/console)
for PR 8740 at commit
[`0926c28`](https://github.
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140303172
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140303230
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140303129
I'll trigger more test build now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140303246
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-140302922
After exploring all the build failure above, Mysql test only fails with
`Image pull failed`, Postgres test would fail due to `create container` or
`pull image`.
---
If
701 - 745 of 745 matches
Mail list logo
