Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146403789
[Test build #43372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43372/console)
for PR 8988 at commit
[`af50f9c`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146403814
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146403816
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9021#issuecomment-146403614
/cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9021
[SPARK-10987] [yarn] Work around for netty rpc disconnection event.
In YARN client mode, when the AM connects to the driver, it may be the case
that the driver never needs to send a message back t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146400254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146400251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146400181
[Test build #43364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43364/console)
for PR 9015 at commit
[`fb0daa1`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146399845
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146399756
[Test build #43370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43370/console)
for PR 8990 at commit
[`44fcbf9`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8909#issuecomment-146399329
[Test build #1856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1856/console)
for PR 8909 at commit
[`3aeae47`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8953#issuecomment-146399281
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8953#issuecomment-146399283
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8953#issuecomment-146399185
[Test build #43366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43366/console)
for PR 8953 at commit
[`081e331`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146399120
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146399121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8962#issuecomment-146399058
@rerngvit, could you rebase it to the latest master? As I moved stats
functions to a new R file stats.R in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8869
---
If your project
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8857#issuecomment-146399070
Hi @vanzin , @sryza any opinion on this PR? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9015#issuecomment-146399027
[Test build #43363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43363/console)
for PR 9015 at commit
[`fb0daa1`](https://github.
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8962#discussion_r41470551
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1873,3 +1872,30 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
collect(x)
}
)
+
+#' freqItems
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146397989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146397969
[Test build #43376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43376/console)
for PR 9019 at commit
[`768055d`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146397983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146397119
[Test build #43376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43376/consoleFull)
for PR 9019 at commit
[`768055d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9020#issuecomment-146395870
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user da-steve101 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9020
[SPARK-10989] [MLLIB] Added the dot and hadamard operators to mllib
Added a basic implementation of dot and hadamard products between vectors
for mllib
You can merge this pull request into a Gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146393923
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#discussion_r41469930
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -91,7 +328,6 @@ trait ScalaReflection {
case t i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019#issuecomment-146393911
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9019
[SPARK-10993] [SQL] Inital code generated encoder for product types
This PR is a first cut at code generating an encoder that takes a Scala
`Product` type and converts it directly into the tungsten
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393689
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393660
[Test build #43365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43365/console)
for PR 8988 at commit
[`c542ae9`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-146393548
[Test build #43375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43375/consoleFull)
for PR 8880 at commit
[`acb5c89`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-146393420
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-146393441
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user winningsix commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-14639
Hi @vanzin, I have just updated the code based the latest upstream. Could
you please take a look at the updated patch? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393295
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146393217
[Test build #43360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43360/console)
for PR 8988 at commit
[`f03ef93`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8918#issuecomment-146391749
[Test build #43374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43374/consoleFull)
for PR 8918 at commit
[`94a707a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146391277
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146391278
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146391252
[Test build #43361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43361/console)
for PR 8988 at commit
[`2bc5ebc`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8918#issuecomment-146390725
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8918#issuecomment-146390741
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8918#issuecomment-146390642
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8931#discussion_r41468810
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -690,6 +697,9 @@ class TungstenAggrega
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8895#issuecomment-146390491
@liancheng Can you take a look at this small change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SaintBacchus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8931#discussion_r41468737
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetrics.scala
---
@@ -35,6 +36,12 @@ private[sql] abstract class SQLMetric[R <:
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8942#issuecomment-146390416
Yeah @tgravescs I'm running in yarn client mode. I'm sure that
`HDFS_DELEGATION_TOKEN token 2339 for spark` is the original token gained by
the driver. But I don't
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8668
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8668#issuecomment-146389770
see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8945
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146389640
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146389641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146389576
[Test build #43369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43369/console)
for PR 8564 at commit
[`7fb3b1c`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8931#discussion_r41468414
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ public boolean putNewKey(
// Here, we'll c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146388687
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8931#issuecomment-146389520
I slightly prefer to separate the total and the quantiles, e.g.
```
memory total: 10G
memory per task (min / med / max): 10MB / 100MB / 1GB
```
Thes
Github user neil-rubens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8696#issuecomment-146389503
+1
using AWS profile is considered to be best practice:
https://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/post/Tx3D6U6WSFGOK2H/A-New-and-Standardized-Way-to-Manage-Crede
Github user neil-rubens closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9018
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user neil-rubens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9018#issuecomment-146389385
Sorry; I haven't noticed the other request; having a very similar proposal;
hence am closing this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146388663
[Test build #43371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43371/console)
for PR 9017 at commit
[`053f3e6`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146388505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146388686
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146388506
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146388370
[Test build #43367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43367/console)
for PR 8564 at commit
[`d3021f0`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146388181
[Test build #43373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43373/consoleFull)
for PR 7788 at commit
[`d1f30a5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146387965
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146387947
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146387753
Update the title and reopen it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
GitHub user chenghao-intel reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788
[SPARK-10992][SQL][WIP]Partial Aggregation Support for Hive UDAF
Add Hive UDAF support for aggregate2. A known issue is we still don't
support the `distinct` keyword for Hive UDAF.
You can
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146387642
Yes @JoshRosen I've just created the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10992, it will be great if you
assign this issue to me. :)
---
If your pr
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9018#issuecomment-146387648
I think that this is a duplicate of #8696. Therefore, I'd recommend closing
this and bumping that other PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9018#issuecomment-146387420
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user neil-rubens opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9018
added option for specifying AWS credential profile
# Need
Utilizing AWS profiles is considered best practice:
https://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/post/Tx3D6U6WSFGOK2H/A-New-and-Standa
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#discussion_r41467358
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -274,12 +275,30 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146386880
[Test build #43372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43372/consoleFull)
for PR 8988 at commit
[`af50f9c`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146386797
[Test build #43371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43371/consoleFull)
for PR 9017 at commit
[`053f3e6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8909#issuecomment-146386233
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8909#issuecomment-146386234
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8909#issuecomment-146386181
[Test build #43350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43350/console)
for PR 8909 at commit
[`b70720f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146385909
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8988#issuecomment-146385921
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146385907
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017#issuecomment-146385922
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9017
[SPARK-10767][PYSPARK] Make pyspark shared params codegen more consistent
Namely "." shows up in some places in the template when using the param
docstring and not in others
You can merge this pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146385709
[Test build #43370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43370/consoleFull)
for PR 8990 at commit
[`44fcbf9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146385387
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146385401
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-146385308
@chenghao-intel, do you want to file a new JIRA to track only the partial
aggregation enhancements for Hive UDAF?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146385212
Sure, looking at the logisticregression impl it seems that it currently
uses transform, but it doesn't do handle the case where the preidction col is
set to "", so I jus
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146385074
[Test build #43369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43369/consoleFull)
for PR 8564 at commit
[`7fb3b1c`](https://gith
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8323#issuecomment-146384917
@JoshRosen How are the doctest-s triggered on the commandline and in
Jenkins?
```
$ python/run-tests --help
No handlers could be found for logger "root"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146384813
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-146384823
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-146384581
LGTM, merging with master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8990#issuecomment-146384271
[Test build #43368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43368/console)
for PR 8990 at commit
[`c7afcd4`](https://github.
101 - 200 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
