Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-149117128
@zero323 , let's discuss the heterogeneous data issue separately in
SPARK-11167. please keep on working on this PR to get it merged ASAP.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149118353
**[Test build #43915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43915/consoleFull)**
for PR 8975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149117988
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9161#issuecomment-149126518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149126342
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9161#issuecomment-149126390
**[Test build #43911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43911/consoleFull)**
for PR 9161 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149127556
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149127703
**[Test build #43920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43920/consoleFull)**
for PR 8884 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149131660
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149131663
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149131593
**[Test build #43920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43920/consoleFull)**
for PR 8884 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#discussion_r42338213
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1457,15 +1457,147 @@ setMethod("join",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
-#' @rdname merge
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149123578
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149123566
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149124931
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149124946
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149124897
**[Test build #43918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43918/consoleFull)**
for PR 9141 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9117#issuecomment-149127284
Yeah this was my thought - could we provide a summary in the stage page
rather than in the stage index.I do see how an aggregated summary is
significantly more
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9117#issuecomment-149128826
+1, let me update this PR according to @pwendell comment. Give me 10mn ;)
Thanks Patrick !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Lewuathe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#discussion_r42338873
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -93,525 +96,641 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
GitHub user nitin2goyal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9167
SPARK-11179: Push filters through aggregate if filters are subset of â¦
â¦'group by' attribute set
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149124303
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149124316
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9117#issuecomment-149126639
@pwendell the locality summary is on the stages page. I can also do a
locality summary on the view of each stage (we have it in the tasks table, but
a summary with the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9161#issuecomment-149126519
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9163#issuecomment-149111767
[Test build #43909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43909/console)
for PR 9163 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149116689
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Lewuathe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#discussion_r42339576
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -93,525 +96,641 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#discussion_r42339518
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -93,525 +96,641 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#discussion_r42339541
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -90,19 +90,18 @@ createDataFrame <- function(sqlContext, data, schema =
NULL, samplingRatio = 1.0
if
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#discussion_r42339491
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -90,19 +90,18 @@ createDataFrame <- function(sqlContext, data, schema =
NULL, samplingRatio = 1.0
if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149116693
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149118778
**[Test build #43915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43915/consoleFull)**
for PR 8975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149118793
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149118798
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149126016
**[Test build #43919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43919/consoleFull)**
for PR 9096 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9117#issuecomment-149125876
ping @kayousterhout to me it's the normal issue - sure it's useful for some
cases, but is it worth putting in the index page? It could be better to just
put a locality
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42344106
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42344144
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/ExecutorTable.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ private[ui] class ExecutorTable(stageId: Int,
Github user prakhar-jauhari commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5018#issuecomment-149137221
Hey @vanzin
Thanks in advance.
I ran in to a issue lately :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11181, while debugging i came
across this pull
GitHub user rishabhbhardwaj opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166
[ SPARK-11180 ] [ SQL ] DataFrame.na.fill does not support Boolean Type
Added support for boolean types in fill and replace methods
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149125265
**[Test build #43917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43917/consoleFull)**
for PR 9166 at commit
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149125256
I think there would be no other hidden pitfall. Just grep the code, most of
the HDFSCacheTaskLocation is created explicitly except for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8639#issuecomment-149130357
**[Test build #43914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43914/consoleFull)**
for PR 8639 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8639#issuecomment-149130618
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42344686
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42344656
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/ExecutorTable.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ private[ui] class ExecutorTable(stageId: Int,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-149112216
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149122916
Good point about vertical alignment. I second the latter format, it
improves the readability a little. I'll implement that here, and I wouldn't
mind doing the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149122843
**[Test build #43916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43916/consoleFull)**
for PR 8975 at commit
GitHub user jbonofre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165
SPARK-6541 - Sort executors by ID (numeric)
"Force" the executor ID sort with Int.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9163#issuecomment-149111950
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9163#issuecomment-149111947
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149121244
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9167#issuecomment-149121232
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149121296
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149126356
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149127452
**[Test build #43918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43918/consoleFull)**
for PR 9141 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9141#issuecomment-149127559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8639#issuecomment-149130615
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#discussion_r42344504
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskLocation.scala
---
@@ -35,16 +37,28 @@ case class ExecutorCacheTaskLocation(override val host:
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42359998
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42359822
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9059#issuecomment-149192174
**[Test build #1927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1927/consoleFull)**
for PR 9059 at commit
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42359699
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149183404
**[Test build #43923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43923/consoleFull)**
for PR 9158 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149189229
**[Test build #43923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43923/consoleFull)**
for PR 9158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149189317
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149189315
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user snnn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#issuecomment-149191804
How is it going? Is it still WIP? I can help to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149191952
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149191967
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149194446
**[Test build #43924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43924/consoleFull)**
for PR 8358 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149155400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149165087
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149165561
**[Test build #43917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43917/consoleFull)**
for PR 9166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149170941
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149170932
**[Test build #43922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43922/consoleFull)**
for PR 8358 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149170942
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9168#issuecomment-149172392
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r42354630
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8976
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149153993
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user Zariel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-149158601
@andrewor14 that sounds like a good idea, log it at INFO or WARN?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user marsishandsome opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9168
[SPARK-11182] HDFS Delegation Token will be expired when calling
"UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser.addCredentials" in HA mode
In HA mode, DFSClient will generate HDFS Delegation Token for
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149143395
@dbtsai Oh. Thanks I updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149166184
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9166#issuecomment-149166186
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149162174
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Zariel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#discussion_r42352139
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -655,15 +655,19 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
// created
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9096#issuecomment-149162176
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149181458
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149153712
**[Test build #43916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43916/consoleFull)**
for PR 8975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8975#issuecomment-149153992
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149155084
**[Test build #43921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43921/consoleFull)**
for PR 8884 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149155399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-149159428
Merging this to master and branch 1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#issuecomment-149181417
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-149141604
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
