Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9211#issuecomment-150104148
Can you add a unit test for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9215#issuecomment-150106110
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9215#issuecomment-150106101
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r42711903
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -17,6 +17,34 @@
# SQLcontext.R: SQLContext-driven functions
+#' Temporary function to reroute old
Github user navis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6790
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9179#issuecomment-150108576
**[Test build #44130 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44130/consoleFull)**
for PR 9179 at commit
GitHub user rick-ibm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202
[SPARK-10857] [SQL] Block SQL injection vulnerabilities under
DataFrameWriter.jdbc().
@marmbrus
@rxin
@joshrosen
@srowen
This patch attempts to address both
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42668737
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,720 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-149998301
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-149998334
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15251
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15256
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15244
**[Test build #44083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44083/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-150008005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-150008007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150011604
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-150012777
**[Test build #44078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44078/consoleFull)**
for PR 6291 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150012763
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-150012954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user saurfang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205
[SPARK-11244][SPARKR] sparkR.stop() should remove SQLContext
SparkR should remove `.sparkRSQLsc` and `.sparkRHivesc` when
`sparkR.stop()` is called. Otherwise even when SparkContext is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8859#issuecomment-150013714
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-150013588
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#discussion_r42677306
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/DockerHacks.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150014839
**[Test build #44087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44087/consoleFull)**
for PR 9190 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995521
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995526
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201#issuecomment-149996202
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JihongMA commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r42668167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -857,3 +857,329 @@ object
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42669119
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,765 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-14732
**[Test build #44083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44083/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150003057
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150003087
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150012760
[Test build #44085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44085/console)
for PR 8729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150012765
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-150013422
**[Test build #44076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44076/consoleFull)**
for PR 8866 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-150013590
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r42677457
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -857,3 +857,329 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150016227
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user xguo27 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201
[SPARK-11242][SQL] In conf/spark-env.sh.template SPARK_DRIVER_MEMORY is
documented incorrectly
Minor fix on the comment
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9197#issuecomment-149995302
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9197#issuecomment-149995300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995360
**[Test build #44080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44080/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150009550
**[Test build #44079 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44079/consoleFull)**
for PR 9154 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150009623
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-150010329
Thanks @NarineK LGTM and I just had one minor inline comment.
@sun-rui Any other comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150012286
[Test build #44085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44085/consoleFull)
for PR 8729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205#issuecomment-150013859
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150013834
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205#issuecomment-150013828
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150013838
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150013862
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150013863
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user noel-smith commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8627#issuecomment-149997391
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203
[SPARK-11243] [SQL] output UnsafeRow from columnar cache
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davies/spark unsafe_cache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997721
**[Test build #44082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44082/consoleFull)**
for PR 8972 at commit
Github user JihongMA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-149997989
Seth, no need to implement the old interface, simply put a placeholder for
resolving it is sufficient, which will go away when this code path is removed.
here
GitHub user calvinjia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204
[SPARK-11236][CORE] Update Tachyon dependency from 0.7.1 -> 0.8.0.
Upgrades the tachyon-client version to the latest release.
No new dependencies are added and no spark facing APIs are
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150005057
**[Test build #44084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44084/consoleFull)**
for PR 9204 at commit
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-150005925
@jayantshekhar Why not put the initialModel into ParamMap as we disussed in
JIRA?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-150007824
**[Test build #44082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44082/consoleFull)**
for PR 8972 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-150012949
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150014390
**[Test build #44088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44088/consoleFull)**
for PR 9175 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205#issuecomment-150015431
Thanks @saurfang -- Test is fine in the current location. Just curious what
are the lint-r errors you saw ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150015488
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-149997285
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997293
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997313
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150009626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42674559
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,720 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#discussion_r42674571
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1457,15 +1457,142 @@ setMethod("join",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
-#' @rdname merge
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150011645
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user falaki commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-150013102
+1 for more R-like merge signature. Thanks for doing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205#issuecomment-150015657
**[Test build #44086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44086/consoleFull)**
for PR 9205 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150016295
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150019732
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150019702
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9205#issuecomment-150019771
**[Test build #44086 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44086/consoleFull)**
for PR 9205 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150020934
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150020994
**[Test build #44092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44092/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150025997
Transient networking issues. test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9178
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150027189
**[Test build #44094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44094/consoleFull)**
for PR 9202 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-150027004
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9036#issuecomment-150027072
Thanks! I'll try and fix the conflicts while merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42684787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -95,41 +99,75 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150027762
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150030288
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42686848
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -618,6 +618,25 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150016965
**[Test build #44089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44089/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150018124
**[Test build #44090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44090/consoleFull)**
for PR 8829 at commit
Github user noel-smith commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8684#issuecomment-150018838
I think we should keep the comments - but just tweak them so that they're
valid [reStructuredText](http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html).
In this case all that
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8113
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user buckhx commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4897#issuecomment-150020186
@davies removed the requirements file from the context constructor. I
looked into add --py-requirements to spark-submit, but it looked a bit more in
depth than I was
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-150021663
This is merging 2 PR/JIRA?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150024132
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user noel-smith commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8627#issuecomment-150025192
@yu-iskw Thanks for testing!
@mengxr I've rebased now - the changes were very minor. Should be good to
merge once the tests complete.
---
If your project is set
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9178#issuecomment-150025412
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150030293
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150016246
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
201 - 300 of 778 matches
Mail list logo
