Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#issuecomment-153017266
**[Test build #44805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44805/consoleFull)**
for PR 9405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#issuecomment-153017384
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8895
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9299#issuecomment-153020674
Looking good to me. Let me leave it a bit for other input.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414
[SPARK-11450][SQL] Add Unsafe Row processing to Expand
This PR enables the Expand operator to process and produce Unsafe Rows.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9085#discussion_r43633782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/AbstractSparkSQLParser.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +106,12 @@ class SqlLexical extends
GitHub user turp1twin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9416
Spark-6373 Add SSL/TLS for the Netty based BlockTransferService
Sorry if this pull request is premature, but I have received very little
feedback, so I am going ahead and creating it. I am still
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9417#issuecomment-153059875
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#issuecomment-153017380
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153050470
**[Test build #44813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44813/consoleFull)**
for PR 9415 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#issuecomment-153050399
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153050637
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153050635
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9417
[SPARK-11449][Core] PortableDataStream should be a factory
```PortableDataStream``` maintains some internal state. This makes it
tricky to reuse a stream (one needs to call ```close``` on both
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153012486
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8895#issuecomment-153014703
LGTM. Thanks for fixing this! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414#issuecomment-153028650
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#issuecomment-153031528
In the current implementation we provide ```Std. Error``` for
```coefficients``` excepts ```intercept```, because that we use optimized
method to calculate
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-153050315
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#issuecomment-153050402
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#issuecomment-153050394
**[Test build #44815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44815/consoleFull)**
for PR 7753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9410#issuecomment-153030063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#issuecomment-153031344
In the current implementation we provide ```Std. Error``` for
```coefficients``` excepts ```intercept```, because that we use optimized
method to calculate
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#issuecomment-153031428
In the current implementation we provide ```Std. Error``` for
```coefficients``` excepts ```intercept```, because that we use optimized
method to calculate
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#issuecomment-153031391
In the current implementation we provide ```Std. Error``` for
```coefficients``` excepts ```intercept```, because that we use optimized
method to calculate
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9085#discussion_r43633899
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -169,6 +169,26 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#issuecomment-153048340
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153050846
**[Test build #44814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44814/consoleFull)**
for PR 9399 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-153057423
Thanks @andrewor14 , I'll look into this soon!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#issuecomment-153029589
**[Test build #44812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44812/consoleFull)**
for PR 9413 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153040844
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153043608
**[Test build #44813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44813/consoleFull)**
for PR 9415 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9417#issuecomment-153059923
@kmader what do you think of this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9408#issuecomment-153013113
**[Test build #44804 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44804/consoleFull)**
for PR 9408 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153012488
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153013074
**[Test build #44810 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44810/consoleFull)**
for PR 9412 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153012481
**[Test build #44811 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44811/consoleFull)**
for PR 9399 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415
[SPARK-11458][SQL] add word count example for Dataset
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark wordcount
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413#discussion_r43634982
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -471,6 +484,59 @@ class LinearRegressionSummary
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9411#issuecomment-153028631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9411#issuecomment-153028628
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153028669
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9411#issuecomment-153028484
**[Test build #44809 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44809/consoleFull)**
for PR 9411 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153028668
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#issuecomment-153040919
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9416#issuecomment-153058457
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9417#issuecomment-153060623
**[Test build #1967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1967/consoleFull)**
for PR 9417 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9408#issuecomment-153013228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9408#issuecomment-153013229
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9413
[SPARK-9836] [ML] Provide R-like summary statistics for OLS via normal
equation solver
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9836
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153028495
**[Test build #44810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44810/consoleFull)**
for PR 9412 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9410#issuecomment-153029895
**[Test build #44806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44806/consoleFull)**
for PR 9410 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9277#issuecomment-153044589
LGTM, merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#issuecomment-153048362
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153048329
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153048363
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-153051220
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-153051172
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153011716
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153011717
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412
[SPARK-11457][Streaming][YARN] Fix incorrect AM proxy filter conf recovery
from checkpoint
Currently Yarn AM proxy filter configuration is recovered from checkpoint
file when Spark Streaming
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153011694
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153011679
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153012036
**[Test build #44811 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44811/consoleFull)**
for PR 9399 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8643#discussion_r43657655
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/LDAModelWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#issuecomment-153099394
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#issuecomment-153099409
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#issuecomment-153099382
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#discussion_r43658099
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -959,6 +963,122 @@ case class ScalaUDF(
}
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9332#issuecomment-153103900
@ted-yu Can you modify a test to use this alias?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412#issuecomment-153115388
LGTM as far as I understand this code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-153116416
Merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-153117330
Hi @kayousterhout , are you ok with my explanation above? I'd like to get
this is soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#discussion_r43662570
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -1135,7 +992,76 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-153117844
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#discussion_r43662693
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -353,4 +354,44 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153119257
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-153119171
Just took another look. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153121113
**[Test build #44820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44820/consoleFull)**
for PR 9383 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9317#issuecomment-153121675
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153121656
**[Test build #44820 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44820/consoleFull)**
for PR 9383 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153121664
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415#discussion_r43648991
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/DatasetWordCount.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153095366
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-153095363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8643#discussion_r43658405
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/LDAModelWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#issuecomment-153100427
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#issuecomment-153100484
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9392#issuecomment-153104431
**[Test build #1969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1969/consoleFull)**
for PR 9392 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9392#issuecomment-153104500
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#issuecomment-153106533
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8100#issuecomment-153115647
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153118810
After some benchmark, realized that using hashcode as prefix in timsort
will cause regression in timsort and snappy compression (especially for
aggregation after join,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#discussion_r43664109
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java
---
@@ -121,13 +125,22 @@ public BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#discussion_r43664703
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java
---
@@ -121,13 +125,22 @@ public BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9392
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#discussion_r43664936
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/FileShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -132,6 +134,15 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9393#discussion_r43657874
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFSuite.scala ---
@@ -191,4 +193,86 @@ class UDFSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSQLContext
{
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#issuecomment-153106415
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9404#discussion_r43660128
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -353,4 +354,44 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
1 - 100 of 1027 matches
Mail list logo
