Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9508#issuecomment-154220387
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154220133
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154220124
**[Test build #45152 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45152/consoleFull)**
for PR 9397 at commit
[`63945b5`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154220140
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9508
[SPARK-11538] [build] Force guava 14 in sbt build.
sbt's version resolution code always picks the most recent version, and we
don't want that for guava.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154219713
**[Test build #45152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45152/consoleFull)**
for PR 9397 at commit
[`63945b5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9502#issuecomment-154219316
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9502#issuecomment-154219317
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9502#issuecomment-154219175
**[Test build #45142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45142/consoleFull)**
for PR 9502 at commit
[`a0bfae4`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154218902
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154218901
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-154218849
@sun-rui Could you take one more look at this ? My idea is to just get a
fix for the performance issue in this PR and not change any behavior (for
better or for worse).
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154218896
**[Test build #45151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45151/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
[`5c3e3fa`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154218023
**[Test build #45151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45151/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
[`5c3e3fa`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154217836
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9443#issuecomment-154217840
LGTM. Thanks @adrian555
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-154217813
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9374#issuecomment-154217279
You fixed them here:
https://github.com/dilipbiswal/spark/commit/4783665a94b092490aa88156ef9d40b8327943ed
I had already merged the patch though.
---
If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154214929
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154214895
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9375#issuecomment-154213813
[Test build #45150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45150/consoleFull)
for PR 9375 at commit
[`f244688`](https://gith
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9374#issuecomment-154213635
@marmbrus Michael, surely i would like fix the style issues. I am closing
this one. Can you please let me know what the problems are ? I would fix them
right away. T
Github user dilipbiswal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154213298
**[Test build #45149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45149/consoleFull)**
for PR 9403 at commit
[`8bcd6c3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154212754
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154212796
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9375#issuecomment-154212795
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9375#issuecomment-154212763
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154212667
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154212555
**[Test build #45127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45127/consoleFull)**
for PR 9477 at commit
[`c35f512`](https://git
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9185#issuecomment-154212591
Sessions allow multiple users to share a Spark SQL Cluster without
clobbering each other. Imagine you have multiple R sessions connected to the
same Spark cluster. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154212662
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9375#issuecomment-154211917
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9421#discussion_r44077155
--- Diff:
extras/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,23 @@ import
com.amazonaws.servic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154210733
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154210731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9507#issuecomment-154210539
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154210580
**[Test build #45148 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45148/consoleFull)**
for PR 9489 at commit
[`7a2a904`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154210332
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154210333
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9477#issuecomment-154210258
**[Test build #45125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45125/consoleFull)**
for PR 9477 at commit
[`854a99f`](https://git
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9421#discussion_r44076396
--- Diff:
extras/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -216,6 +226,25 @@ private[kinesis] class KinesisRece
GitHub user reactormonk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9507
[SPARK-11539] debian packaging
A few questions that could simplify the package:
a) does spark-env.sh need to be a bash script? With VAR=value only I could
use EnvironmentFile= from syst
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154209846
**[Test build #1991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1991/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#issuecomment-154209278
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#issuecomment-154209280
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154209201
**[Test build #1992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1992/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#issuecomment-154209027
**[Test build #45135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45135/consoleFull)**
for PR 9380 at commit
[`e3417aa`](https://git
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#discussion_r44075748
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -590,6 +633,29 @@ def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):
return DataFrame(jdf, self.sql_ctx)
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#discussion_r44075504
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -590,6 +633,29 @@ def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):
return DataFrame(jdf, self.sql_ctx)
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9374#issuecomment-154208255
Sorry, I merged this one before noticing the small style issues, so you'll
need to do a new PR if you want to fix them. Eitherway, can you click `Close`
on this PR?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154208272
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154208165
**[Test build #45145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45145/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154208274
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154207752
**[Test build #1990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1990/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://gi
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#discussion_r44075195
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -70,6 +70,21 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Web
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-154206133
Can you post the updated screenshot?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user kashif closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user kashif commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506#issuecomment-154205721
ah cool no problem!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506#issuecomment-154204246
Looks like @nongli beat you to it https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154204377
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9443#issuecomment-154204181
@shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154204161
@nongli
you can run the python test locally by python/run-tests --module
pyspark-sql (take a look at -h to see the exact command)
before you run that, you
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154203756
That's it; just minor comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44074302
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44074319
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/DefaultReadWriteTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44074311
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44074314
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/DefaultReadWriteTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154202749
Tested this locally and other than needing to set `DOCKER_IP` everything
worked great. Talked ot @JoshRosen offline and he's going to try and automate
this.
---
If y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154202755
**[Test build #45148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45148/consoleFull)**
for PR 9489 at commit
[`7a2a904`](https://gith
Github user kashif commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506#issuecomment-154202591
@rxin yes sorry fixing it now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9500#issuecomment-154202388
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9500#issuecomment-154202389
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154202114
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506#issuecomment-154202100
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9489#issuecomment-154202141
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9500#issuecomment-154202170
**[Test build #45131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45131/consoleFull)**
for PR 9500 at commit
[`2ec4ce1`](https://git
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506#issuecomment-154201710
I don't think Python supports function overloading this way ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154201462
**[Test build #45147 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45147/consoleFull)**
for PR 9504 at commit
[`2ce6da8`](https://git
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154201535
Here's the command that I used:
```
pssh -O StrictHostKeyChecking=no -h /root/jenkins_workers.txt -i -x '-t -t'
"sudo docker pull mysql:5.7.9"
```
--
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154201525
Title should have the [SQL] tag as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154201470
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154201476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
GitHub user kashif opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9506
[SPARK-11508] [Python] Python API for repartition and sortWithinPartitions
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kashif/spark SPARK-115
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154201120
**[Test build #45147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45147/consoleFull)**
for PR 9504 at commit
[`2ce6da8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9505#issuecomment-154201082
**[Test build #45146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45146/consoleFull)**
for PR 9505 at commit
[`b57064a`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9505#issuecomment-154200859
See reviewable here: https://reviewable.io/reviews/apache/spark/9505
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154201004
For posterity, is there any easy way to do the parallel pull if we upgrade
one of the images or add a new one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9505#issuecomment-154200528
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154200588
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9505#issuecomment-154200591
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154200540
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9505
[SPARK-11536][SQL] Remove the internal implicit conversion from Expression
to Column in functions.scala
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154199547
**[Test build #1991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1991/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://git
GitHub user nongli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504
[SPARK-11410] [PYSPARK] Add python bindings for repartition and sortWâ¦
â¦ithinPartitions.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/nongl
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9501#issuecomment-154199308
Thanks @srowen for reviewing the changes. They indeed are small since
they're the outcome of me going through the code and learning Spark this way.
When I run acr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154199038
**[Test build #1992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1992/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`bf98ae0`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154198822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154198829
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
501 - 600 of 1068 matches
Mail list logo
