GitHub user yueqianzhu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9515
[SPARK-11547] set fetchSize default value in JDBCRDD
if I do not set any properties manual for jdbc, when I show the data in the
table, it will throw an exception like below:
Exception in
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#discussion_r44104918
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -23,9 +23,10 @@ import scala.reflect.ClassTag
import
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9407#issuecomment-154289480
@mengxr LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9378#issuecomment-154291300
@gliptak Yes it is duplicated with #9340 . Do you plan to change example
code of mllib decision tree?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9514#issuecomment-154292602
**[Test build #45198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45198/consoleFull)**
for PR 9514 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9514#issuecomment-154292678
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9378#issuecomment-154292594
@gliptak And sorry for my mistake of the mismatch between the title and
content in [SPARK-11382](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11382). I
have already
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9514#issuecomment-154292680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#discussion_r44105940
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GroupedDataset.scala
---
@@ -46,9 +55,16 @@ class GroupedDataset[K, T] private[sql](
throw
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154293108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jbonofre commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#discussion_r44106408
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -70,6 +70,21 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-154303891
Sure, let me prepare that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9511#issuecomment-154311765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9511#issuecomment-154311760
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9511#issuecomment-154311429
**[Test build #45194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45194/consoleFull)**
for PR 9511 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154316345
In general, I think we'd better add more IR (Intermediate Representation,
should be the Expression or Logical Plan node here) for common sub expression
cases,
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44108481
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +164,30 @@ abstract class Expression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-154328642
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-154328628
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-154328626
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-154328641
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154329144
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-154329217
@squito I have rebased this branch to the latest spark/master branch, so
there should be no conflict to merge. About the new wiki page of
BlacklistStrategy, could we first
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154329162
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9516#issuecomment-154329143
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453#issuecomment-154329702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453#issuecomment-154329703
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453#issuecomment-154329617
**[Test build #45197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45197/consoleFull)**
for PR 9453 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44091460
--- Diff: streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/State.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9511#issuecomment-154248958
**[Test build #45175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45175/consoleFull)**
for PR 9511 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484#discussion_r44091629
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -367,6 +367,34 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
}
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9375#issuecomment-154249588
Thanks, merging. Can you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9408#discussion_r44092650
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -167,17 +167,38 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154253093
Will this break source compatibility for Java 8 users?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154253372
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154253384
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154255325
The failure may be because protobuf 2.6.1 was not enabled. BTW, if 2.6.1 is
enabled, shouldn't protobuf 2.6.1 break other stuff in Spark and make the
end-to-end test
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154256138
@zsxwing probably not. Locally tests pass. They fail on jenkins for some
reason. I've enabled a lot of the logging to look deeper into it.
---
If your project is set up
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154256416
I don't believe so, I tried the following which compiled and ran fine with
Java 8, giving deprecation warnings
```java
inputStream.foreachRDD(x
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-154256209
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414#issuecomment-154256241
**[Test build #45160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45160/consoleFull)**
for PR 9414 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-154256187
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-154257555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-15426
**[Test build #45184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45184/consoleFull)**
for PR 8505 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154260786
I see. `JFunction[R, Void]` requires a `return null;` statement at the end
while `VoidFunction[R]` doesn't requires a return value.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44095840
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/TrackStateSpec.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9508
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9412
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44096879
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/EmittedRecordsDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9509
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154263160
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9512#issuecomment-154263901
**[Test build #45165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45165/consoleFull)**
for PR 9512 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9512#issuecomment-154263963
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9512#issuecomment-154263961
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154264792
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154264933
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154264653
**[Test build #45186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45186/consoleFull)**
for PR 9499 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r44097663
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -148,18 +152,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private(
def transform[U](t:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154264930
**[Test build #45186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45186/consoleFull)**
for PR 9499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-154264808
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-154264794
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154264809
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44098629
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/PairDStreamFunctions.scala
---
@@ -350,6 +349,18 @@ class PairDStreamFunctions[K,
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154272233
Does `docs/monitoring.md` need an update to include the new config?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154272379
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154272194
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#discussion_r44099630
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/MetricsConfig.scala
---
@@ -57,14 +59,16 @@ private[spark] class MetricsConfig(conf: SparkConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154272327
**[Test build #45176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45176/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154272326
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154272305
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154272376
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154275794
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154278441
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154283401
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154283398
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9514#issuecomment-154285290
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9514#issuecomment-154285304
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44105110
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +164,30 @@ abstract class Expression extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9468#discussion_r44105125
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/SimpleTextHadoopFsRelationSuite.scala
---
@@ -70,43 +76,297 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154289768
**[Test build #45193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45193/consoleFull)**
for PR 4632 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154289985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-154289989
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154293008
**[Test build #45191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45191/consoleFull)**
for PR 9499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154293106
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9512#issuecomment-154299003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9512#issuecomment-154299020
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user GraceH commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7888#issuecomment-154322010
Thanks @andrewor14.
Hi @vanzin, Let me give a quick brief to you about the patch and its goal.
There is a bug in dynamic allocation. Since some of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154326566
**[Test build #45196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45196/consoleFull)**
for PR 9482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154326634
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154326635
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-154328189
PR rebased and implement Kay's suggestion (about the locality level summary
string format)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-154327787
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user pravingadakh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9516
[SPARK-11550][Docs] Replace example code in mllib-optimization.md using
include_example
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-154328910
**[Test build #45199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45199/consoleFull)**
for PR 9270 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154329615
**[Test build #45201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45201/consoleFull)**
for PR 9297 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-154329464
**[Test build #45200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45200/consoleFull)**
for PR 8760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9499#issuecomment-154248884
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9490#issuecomment-154250434
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r44092102
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-154250441
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
701 - 800 of 1008 matches
Mail list logo
