Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44159597
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/DefaultReadWriteTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154470661
@jkbradley I removed `from` and `to` because `from` is a Python keyword.
Instead, I added `load(path)` and `save(path)` as shortcuts.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453#issuecomment-154466807
looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-154466223
@davies I think it would be better to do that in a follow up pr. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154461001
**[Test build #45224 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45224/consoleFull)**
for PR 9454 at commit
[`a410538`](https://gith
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9501#issuecomment-154457887
The only files that touch spaces are `ShuffleMapTask.scala` and
`TaskSet.scala` (and these could be reverted). The others look more than space
fixes.
Wha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154457322
Build started sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154457267
Build triggered. sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8314#discussion_r44154887
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1458,8 +1458,8 @@ test_that("sampleBy() on a DataFrame", {
fractions <- list("0" = 0.1, "1" = 0.2)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#discussion_r44154791
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#discussion_r44154223
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -231,13 +247,13 @@ public MemoryBlock allocatePage(long size,
MemoryConsume
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-154448615
@viirya This patch looks good to me now. Another thing is that we can
generate code for catalyst converter now (see RowEncoder), and we have a plan
to replace catalyst co
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-154446468
Hi @mwws thanks for the updating. Did you see my comment about taskId vs
taskIndex? That is really important and needs to be fixed and tested. Sorry I
only just caught
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9491#discussion_r44148909
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaAFTSurvivalRegressionExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9515#discussion_r44147597
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
v
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9465#discussion_r44146876
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df: DataFrame)
{
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154434255
just a couple of minor comments, almost there!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#discussion_r44145598
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/MasterUISuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#discussion_r44144864
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/MasterUISuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#discussion_r44144034
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/MasterUISuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#discussion_r44143946
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/MasterUISuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154429445
The build output tells you how to fix the mima issue, though its buried in
the middle of the logs:
```
[error] * method
this(java.lang.String,java.lang.Stri
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9476
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#issuecomment-154429147
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9476#issuecomment-154429272
Merged to master/1.6/1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154428684
ah sorry, I was working on multiple PRs and messed up the jira number...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154426034
Did you have the wrong jira ticket?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9482#issuecomment-154425909
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user travishegner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9495#issuecomment-154423022
Thanks @yhuai for taking care of this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user mariusvniekerk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9137#issuecomment-154415116
@JoshRosen Guess its refactor time due to SPARK-11541.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154414399
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154414395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9378#issuecomment-154414289
@gliptak, SPARK-11445 aims to fix mllib-ensemble.md, while this one
(SPARK-11382) aims to fix mllib-decision-tree.md. They are two different JIRA
issues.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154414240
**[Test build #45221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45221/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
[`c761736`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154411109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-15441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154410934
**[Test build #45222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45222/consoleFull)**
for PR 9521 at commit
[`6cdbc5a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154407274
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154407276
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154407215
**[Test build #45220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45220/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`cba340f`](https://git
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154399110
I'd like to get an OK from @tdas before merging this for 1.6. It doesn't
remove an API, but adds and deprecates, even if it's pretty clearly improving
this relative to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154398776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154398794
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154398786
**[Test build #45223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45223/consoleFull)**
for PR 9436 at commit
[`8080d88`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154398778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154398789
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154398663
**[Test build #45219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45219/consoleFull)**
for PR 9406 at commit
[`d3bdb2b`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154397690
**[Test build #45223 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45223/consoleFull)**
for PR 9436 at commit
[`8080d88`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154396484
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436#issuecomment-154396459
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JasmineGeorge commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-154395939
@yinxusen does everything look good now ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-154395029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-154395028
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-154394971
**[Test build #45217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45217/consoleFull)**
for PR 9287 at commit
[`b83ab2c`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9522#issuecomment-154390716
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user pravingadakh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9522
[SPARK-11535][ML] handling empty string in StringIndexer
Replacing "" (not null) with string "EMPTY_STRING" in StringIndexer.
Another approach is to use "0" (or next available integer), but it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7410#issuecomment-154390375
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7410#issuecomment-154390376
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7410#issuecomment-154390255
**[Test build #45216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45216/consoleFull)**
for PR 7410 at commit
[`ed4d179`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154389540
**[Test build #45222 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45222/consoleFull)**
for PR 9521 at commit
[`6cdbc5a`](https://gith
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9378#issuecomment-154389335
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11445 is already being worked
at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9407
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154388797
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154388703
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521
[SPARK-11554][SQL] add map/flatMap to GroupedDataset
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark map
Alternatively you ca
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9501#issuecomment-154383561
**[Test build #1996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1996/consoleFull)**
for PR 9501 at commit
[`aa911d5`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-154381940
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-154381942
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-154381876
[Test build #45206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45206/console)
for PR 9008 at commit
[`c1785a8`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414#issuecomment-154381081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414#issuecomment-154381079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9414#issuecomment-154380928
**[Test build #45213 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45213/consoleFull)**
for PR 9414 at commit
[`26f6f7e`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154380899
**[Test build #45221 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45221/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
[`c761736`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9468#issuecomment-154378537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9468#issuecomment-154378538
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9468#issuecomment-154378200
**[Test build #45212 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45212/consoleFull)**
for PR 9468 at commit
[`433632a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154377373
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154377374
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154377270
**[Test build #45218 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45218/consoleFull)**
for PR 9520 at commit
[`50eee83`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154377089
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154377070
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154375329
**[Test build #45220 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45220/consoleFull)**
for PR 9503 at commit
[`cba340f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154373282
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154373259
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154373174
Even though we can't bump Spark's own Jersey version without having to
worry about Hadoop conflicts, we might be able to bump the version _just_ in
the SQL tests.
--
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154372363
**[Test build #45219 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45219/consoleFull)**
for PR 9406 at commit
[`d3bdb2b`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154371741
@marmbrus, I think the reason that we didn't run into this problem is
because boot2docker on the Mac doesn't connect using unix sockets:
https://groups.google.com/foru
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154371145
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154371130
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154370191
Ha, it turns out that `docker-java` isn't a viable option because it also
has Jersey conflicts: https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154369514
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154369516
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154369560
I think that the test failures that occurred earlier were due to an older
incompatible version of ASM being pulled in via Jersey. From a binary
compatibility point of
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-154369445
**[Test build #45203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45203/consoleFull)**
for PR 9297 at commit
[`927bae8`](https://git
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154369474
Jenkins is not retesting... @marmbrus could you add me to the whitelist?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154368700
H... this is a bit of a strange error.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#issuecomment-154368715
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154368432
**[Test build #45218 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45218/consoleFull)**
for PR 9520 at commit
[`50eee83`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154366533
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9520#issuecomment-154366500
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
601 - 700 of 803 matches
Mail list logo
