Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154787413
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154780369
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154780356
**[Test build #45297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45297/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`471b934`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154778100
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154778091
**[Test build #45298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45298/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`c96caf1`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154778052
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776803
**[Test build #45298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45298/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`c96caf1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776724
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154776727
**[Test build #45296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45296/consoleFull)**
for PR 9536 at commit
[`ef606f4`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154776733
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776726
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776182
**[Test build #45297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45297/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`471b934`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154776068
**[Test build #45296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45296/consoleFull)**
for PR 9536 at commit
[`ef606f4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775922
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775926
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775878
I think the mesos test failure was unrelated, jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154775807
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775823
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775811
**[Test build #45294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45294/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`471b934`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9536#issuecomment-154775809
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9545#issuecomment-154775700
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user c-kang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9545
[Docs] Fix typo for Python section on unifying Kafka streams
1) kafkaStreams is a list. The list should be unpacked when passing it
into the streaming context union method, which accepts a variable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154774124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154774115
**[Test build #45295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45295/consoleFull)**
for PR 9521 at commit
[`96f9d00`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9316
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9457#issuecomment-154773692
@moustaki For the sparse vector issue, we can wait for the change in spark
1.7 since this PR will not be in 1.6. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154773438
**[Test build #45295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45295/consoleFull)**
for PR 9521 at commit
[`96f9d00`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773299
**[Test build #45294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45294/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`471b934`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9544#issuecomment-154773211
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154773213
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773216
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9521#issuecomment-154773215
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773212
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user mindprince opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9544
[DOC] [MINOR] [SQL] Fix internal link
It doesn't show up as a hyperlink currently. It will show up as a hyperlink
after this change.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runn
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154771811
Looks like the failed test exposed a problem of our rewriter? Different
results are all from regular count.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154771670
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154771659
**[Test build #45293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45293/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
[`3f8209f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9543#issuecomment-154771124
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user xguo27 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9543
[SPARK-11482][SQL] Make maven repo for Hive metastore jars configurable
Introducing a property called "spark.sql.hive.maven.repo" to let user
configure the maven repository to download Hive Metastore
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-154770983
@srowen I'm running ```build/sbt dependency-tree``` and it is literally
running for several hours now. Is there an easier way to work this (or is there
something to corr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154768711
**[Test build #45293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45293/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
[`3f8209f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154768475
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154768480
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154768450
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9503#issuecomment-154767444
I submitted a PR to `docker-client` to try to relocate the ASM classes in
the shaded JAR: https://github.com/spotify/docker-client/pull/272. In the
meantime, I'll star
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154764742
**[Test build #45292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45292/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
[`3f8209f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154764761
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154760918
**[Test build #2005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2005/consoleFull)**
for PR 9409 at commit
[`5c46cec`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154758153
Seems like I have broken something. I'll need to rebase anyway.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154753882
I don't think I made changes relevant to the tests..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9541
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9541#issuecomment-154753581
LGTM. Merging to master and 1.6 branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154753512
**[Test build #45292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45292/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
[`3f8209f`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154753467
oh, right, I pasted the wrong link.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154753111
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154753105
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154752998
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752963
This one is currently running:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2005/consoleFull
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752585
Hope
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2003/ can
finish without any problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752499
hmm... seems jenkins did not pick up this pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752218
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154752182
**[Test build #45291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45291/consoleFull)**
for PR 9451 at commit
[`70d1fad`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154752200
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752165
**[Test build #2005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2005/consoleFull)**
for PR 9409 at commit
[`5c46cec`](https://git
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44217123
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,14 @@ object Utils {
m
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154752033
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user reggert commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-154751770
I've added some unit tests that verify that my changes, do, indeed, stop
callbacks from consuming threads before the jobs have completed.
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154751482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154751470
**[Test build #45290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45290/consoleFull)**
for PR 9472 at commit
[`c29fe8b`](https://git
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154750495
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44216923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,14 @@ object Utils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154748281
**[Test build #45289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45289/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`f12d0bd`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154748475
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154743895
**[Test build #45291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45291/consoleFull)**
for PR 9451 at commit
[`70d1fad`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9092#issuecomment-154743585
I'm wondering now if we should set it to convert to lowercase by default.
I know it breaks behavior, but otherwise, we'll introduce an inconsistency in
the API (betwe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154743558
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154743562
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9092#discussion_r44216481
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/TokenizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +69,18 @@ class RegexTokenizerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9092#discussion_r44216479
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Tokenizer.scala
---
@@ -100,10 +100,25 @@ class RegexTokenizer(override val uid: String)
/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9541#issuecomment-154742161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9541#issuecomment-154742112
**[Test build #45288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45288/consoleFull)**
for PR 9541 at commit
[`58407c8`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154740655
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-154740621
**[Test build #45287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45287/consoleFull)**
for PR 9496 at commit
[`75c2713`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154740564
**[Test build #45290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45290/consoleFull)**
for PR 9472 at commit
[`c29fe8b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154740160
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154740151
Oops my bad, also removed the unnecessary sbin/../ from the other tachyon
paths
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154740163
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9472#issuecomment-154740046
Rebased without conflicts
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44215590
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,14 @@ object Utils {
m
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738716
**[Test build #45289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45289/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`f12d0bd`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738601
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738590
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738488
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vidma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#discussion_r44215458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -904,3 +907,49 @@ object RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions
Github user vidma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#discussion_r44215375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -904,3 +907,49 @@ object RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#discussion_r44215283
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1478,18 +1478,54 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
/**
* Return
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#discussion_r44215279
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1478,18 +1478,54 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
/**
* Return
Github user vidma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-154731768
so any comments, guys?
@marmbrus ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-15472
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user xwu0226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542
[Spark-11522][SQL] input_file_name() returns "" for external tables
When computing partition for non-parquet relation, `HadoopRDD.compute` is
used. but it does not set the thread local variable `inp
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
