Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#discussion_r44323340
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StageTable.scala ---
@@ -145,9 +145,20 @@ private[ui] class StageTableBase(
case None =>
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44323247
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#discussion_r44323362
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StageTable.scala ---
@@ -145,9 +145,20 @@ private[ui] class StageTableBase(
case None =>
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155175125
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155175092
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-155176563
This patch looks alright. I left a few minor comments but I'll merge it
after they are addressed. Separately we should address @tgravescs' request for
SPARK-11185 at
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44324308
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#discussion_r44324313
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -50,92 +50,10 @@ object Encoder {
def DOUBLE:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155177514
**[Test build #45406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45406/consoleFull)**
for PR 5267 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9574#issuecomment-155182146
**[Test build #45405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45405/consoleFull)**
for PR 9574 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-155185089
**[Test build #45384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45384/consoleFull)**
for PR 9480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-155185293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#issuecomment-155188203
**[Test build #45409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45409/consoleFull)**
for PR 9555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#issuecomment-155188209
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#discussion_r44328940
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -50,92 +50,10 @@ object Encoder {
def DOUBLE:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-155160422
**[Test build #45383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45383/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155160682
**[Test build #45398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45398/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9556#issuecomment-155160400
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-155160617
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155164455
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user vonnagy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-155166356
I was unable to duplicate the issue I had with the `listenerThread.join` so
it seems that your change solved the issue.
If I encounter the issue again then I
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9560#issuecomment-155166778
LGTM, merging with master, branch-1.6, branch-1.5, and branch-1.4
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155166627
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155166554
**[Test build #45388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45388/consoleFull)**
for PR 9513 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9551#issuecomment-155169381
This has been merged already.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320580
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155169298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155168576
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44321308
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -258,11 +258,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* subclasses of RDD.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44321996
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -258,11 +258,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* subclasses of RDD.
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9421#issuecomment-155175426
@zsxwing It should be acceptable as well. Think about it like this:
We have 2 receivers, A and B:
t0 -> A receives batch with seq number x_0, B receives batch with
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#discussion_r44323350
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StageTable.scala ---
@@ -145,9 +145,20 @@ private[ui] class StageTableBase(
case None =>
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8643#issuecomment-155175314
@jkbradley sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#discussion_r44323731
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StageTable.scala ---
@@ -145,9 +145,20 @@ private[ui] class StageTableBase(
case None =>
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#discussion_r44323839
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDatasetSuite.java ---
@@ -299,59 +299,33 @@ public void testJoin() {
@Test
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44323843
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user piaozhexiu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8512#discussion_r44330648
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@
${avro.mapred.classifier}
+ com.amazonaws
+ aws-java-sdk
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9507#issuecomment-155161478
With my apologies, would you mind closing this PR? I believe this was
already removed from Spark. This PR will remain anyhow to show what you put
together.
---
If your
Github user olarayej commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155161252
@shivaram @felixcheung
I followed the same steps described by @shivaram.
What's confusing for us is that every time we run a fetch followed by a
merge, it
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155163698
**[Test build #45397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45397/consoleFull)**
for PR 9573 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155165539
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155165525
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320330
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320223
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320866
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableRDDCheckpointData.scala ---
@@ -63,11 +98,20 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#discussion_r44322215
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#issuecomment-155172521
**[Test build #45387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45387/consoleFull)**
for PR 9143 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44322179
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#discussion_r44323023
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SumOf.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155174143
**[Test build #45396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45396/consoleFull)**
for PR 5267 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44323496
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9556#issuecomment-155182875
**[Test build #45407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45407/consoleFull)**
for PR 9556 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9556#discussion_r44327164
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -146,148 +146,105 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155185664
Second pass. Most significant comments are about completely removing
`Vector` from the public API and debating `DistributedLDAModel < LDAModel` vs
`abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-155185724
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-155185761
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#issuecomment-155187488
**[Test build #45409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45409/consoleFull)**
for PR 9555 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155190761
**[Test build #45406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45406/consoleFull)**
for PR 5267 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155164443
**[Test build #45398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45398/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155164550
**[Test build #45397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45397/consoleFull)**
for PR 9573 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155164557
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9560
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155168228
**[Test build #45403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45403/consoleFull)**
for PR 9573 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320118
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44320738
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableRDDCheckpointData.scala ---
@@ -63,11 +98,20 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9574
[SPARK-11463] [PYSPARK] only install signal in main thread
Only install signal in main thread, or it will fail to create context in
not-main thread.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9574#issuecomment-155170467
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44321310
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155170628
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9526#issuecomment-155170436
**[Test build #45404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45404/consoleFull)**
for PR 9526 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9574#issuecomment-155170496
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9572#issuecomment-155172704
**[Test build #45394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45394/consoleFull)**
for PR 9572 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#issuecomment-155172748
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9224#discussion_r44322374
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/Predictor.scala ---
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ abstract class Predictor[
private[ml] def
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155172649
Yeah something seems to be messed up. You shouldn't get other files changed
if you do a fetch + merge as long as the rest of your tree is synced to the
same place.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#discussion_r44322400
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CheckpointingIterator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44323084
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-155174569
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9366#issuecomment-155171975
In general I think that currently there are some issues in the
StatFunctions.scala:
It seems that all computations both for covariance and correlation are
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44324500
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9421#discussion_r44324452
--- Diff:
extras/kinesis-asl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisCheckpointerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#discussion_r44326231
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/Aggregator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-155186811
**[Test build #45408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45408/consoleFull)**
for PR 9165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#issuecomment-155186853
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9555#issuecomment-155186821
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155159546
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155159619
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155159575
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9573#issuecomment-155159524
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155165945
**[Test build #45375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45375/consoleFull)**
for PR 9567 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155165981
I had not written tests very carefully, so they had some bugs. Updated now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155165489
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-155165511
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-155166790
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155166751
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-155167098
**[Test build #45402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45402/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-155166791
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-155166742
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44321879
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#discussion_r44321863
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
601 - 700 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
