GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993
[SPARK-11990][SQL] Don't collapse projections if UDFs are referred in
multiple aliases
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11990
We should not collapse projections in UDFs are
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#issuecomment-159840334
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#discussion_r45950794
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -690,12 +684,24 @@ object PushPredicateThroughAggregat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159839408
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#discussion_r45950678
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159839409
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159839358
**[Test build #46741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46741/consoleFull)**
for PR 9478 at commit
[`4ca2d72`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#issuecomment-159838880
**[Test build #2116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2116/consoleFull)**
for PR 9959 at commit
[`951fe7a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159837934
**[Test build #2117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2117/consoleFull)**
for PR 9969 at commit
[`d3edd4f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159837266
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159837265
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user toddwan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9886#issuecomment-159836411
@andrewor14 I am not sure about the cause of the unit test failure, but the
failed test reported in the latest test build can pass on my machine.
---
If your project is
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9978#issuecomment-159835906
merged to master/1.6/1.5/1.4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9978
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r45949524
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite extends S
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159834627
Thank you for your help! @rxin @davies
Just let me know if you need me to do any JIRA. Have a good holiday!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159834358
Thanks - I'm going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159834158
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159834159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9593#issuecomment-159833994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#issuecomment-159834036
**[Test build #46755 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46755/consoleFull)**
for PR 9969 at commit
[`074f2a7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9593#issuecomment-159833997
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9593#issuecomment-159833901
**[Test build #46733 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46733/consoleFull)**
for PR 9593 at commit
[`8a324ff`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159833495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159833491
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159833284
**[Test build #46750 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46750/consoleFull)**
for PR 9977 at commit
[`b83525a`](https://git
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r45949221
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite extends S
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#issuecomment-159830195
**[Test build #46754 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46754/consoleFull)**
for PR 9992 at commit
[`771b33c`](https://gith
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r45948964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite extend
GitHub user suyanNone opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992
[SPARK-12009][Yarn]Avoid to re-allocating yarn container while driver want
to stop all Executors
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159829308
@cloud-fan failed again in the same way. Looks like its some intermittent
issue and its more friendly to me :-). Wenchen, is there a way i can issue a
retest request
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#discussion_r45948599
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/CartesianProduct.scala
---
@@ -17,16 +17,69 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9969#discussion_r45948611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/CartesianProduct.scala
---
@@ -17,16 +17,69 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9796#issuecomment-159827044
**[Test build #46752 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46752/consoleFull)**
for PR 9796 at commit
[`154ab31`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r45948582
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite extends S
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159826133
**[Test build #46750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46750/consoleFull)**
for PR 9977 at commit
[`b83525a`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#issuecomment-159825648
**[Test build #46751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46751/consoleFull)**
for PR 9991 at commit
[`8ca3031`](https://gith
Github user carsonwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-159825154
I just submitted #9991 to fix the test failure. Details are described in
the new PR. Thanks all!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9988#discussion_r45948174
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TrackStateDStream.scala
---
@@ -132,22 +132,39 @@ class InternalTrackStateDStream[K: Cl
GitHub user carsonwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991
[SPARK-11206] (Followup) Fix SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite test error
A followup to #9297, fix the SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite test error. The
[failure](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spa
Github user GraceH commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9796#issuecomment-159824727
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159823505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159823369
**[Test build #46747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46747/consoleFull)**
for PR 9981 at commit
[`9bee82b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159823502
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9988#discussion_r45947853
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TrackStateDStream.scala
---
@@ -132,22 +132,39 @@ class InternalTrackStateDStream[K: Cl
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159821847
There are other places need to be fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#issuecomment-159818068
**[Test build #46749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46749/consoleFull)**
for PR 9959 at commit
[`37b3088`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9987#issuecomment-159816190
**[Test build #46729 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46729/consoleFull)**
for PR 9987 at commit
[`83acf37`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9796#issuecomment-159816201
**[Test build #46728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46728/consoleFull)**
for PR 9796 at commit
[`154ab31`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9987#issuecomment-159816212
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9796#issuecomment-159816229
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9987#issuecomment-159816209
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9796#issuecomment-159816226
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159816094
**[Test build #46748 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46748/consoleFull)**
for PR 9990 at commit
[`6b5ff4f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159816096
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159816095
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#discussion_r45946958
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2028,4 +2028,25 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCont
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#issuecomment-159815798
I'd just simply the test case as Davies suggested, and then merge this in.
In parallel you can work on a patch to fix whatever bugs you find.
---
If your project is set u
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159815609
**[Test build #46748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46748/consoleFull)**
for PR 9990 at commit
[`6b5ff4f`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9959#issuecomment-159815023
**[Test build #2116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2116/consoleFull)**
for PR 9959 at commit
[`951fe7a`](https://git
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#discussion_r45946595
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1468,22 +1481,47 @@ def get_json_object(col, path):
:param col: string column in json forma
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159814445
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-159814436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-159814439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#discussion_r45946448
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources._
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-159814177
**[Test build #46742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46742/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
[`31a31a2`](https://git
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990
[SPARK-11700] [SQL] use weak reference to avoid memory leak
cc @zsxwing
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davies/spark leak_context
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159812459
**[Test build #46747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46747/consoleFull)**
for PR 9981 at commit
[`9bee82b`](https://gith
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9970#discussion_r45946153
--- Diff: R/pkg/DESCRIPTION ---
@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ Collate:
'schema.R'
'generics.R'
'jobj.R'
-'RDD.R'
-'pairRDD.R'
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9977#discussion_r45945922
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1468,22 +1481,47 @@ def get_json_object(col, path):
:param col: string column in json format
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159810727
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-159810562
**[Test build #46746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46746/consoleFull)**
for PR 9976 at commit
[`d626bfc`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9983#issuecomment-159809986
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9983#issuecomment-159809987
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9983#issuecomment-159809957
**[Test build #46724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46724/consoleFull)**
for PR 9983 at commit
[`4dfa265`](https://git
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-159809862
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9984
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159808553
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159808552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159808549
**[Test build #46745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46745/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`a1a8b0c`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159808163
**[Test build #46745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46745/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`a1a8b0c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9978#issuecomment-159808039
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9978#issuecomment-159808042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9978#issuecomment-159807974
**[Test build #46735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46735/consoleFull)**
for PR 9978 at commit
[`b870612`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159806939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159806935
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-159806689
**[Test build #46739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46739/consoleFull)**
for PR 9478 at commit
[`1653691`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159806521
**[Test build #46744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46744/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`4b89893`](https://gith
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159806047
@cloud-fan can you please help trigger a retest. Looks like an unrelated
failure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9965#issuecomment-159805218
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9965#issuecomment-159805216
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9965#issuecomment-159804986
**[Test build #46743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46743/consoleFull)**
for PR 9965 at commit
[`a77743f`](https://git
Github user winningsix commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-159804799
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159804528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159804507
**[Test build #46737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46737/consoleFull)**
for PR 9981 at commit
[`9bee82b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-159804527
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9982#issuecomment-159803737
**[Test build #46721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46721/consoleFull)**
for PR 9982 at commit
[`77df0ce`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9982#issuecomment-159803869
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9982#issuecomment-159803871
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
1 - 100 of 634 matches
Mail list logo
