Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161558331
**[Test build #2157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2157/consoleFull)**
for PR 10124 at commit
[`a66723e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161557967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161557968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161557846
**[Test build #47128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47128/consoleFull)**
for PR 10124 at commit
[`a66723e`](https://g
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10126
[SPARK-12120][PYSPARK] Improve exception message when failing to initâ¦
â¦ialize HiveContext in PySpark
This is the error message after this PR
```
15/12/03 16:59:53 WARN ObjectSto
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10112#issuecomment-161556224
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10077#issuecomment-161556126
**[Test build #47131 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47131/consoleFull)**
for PR 10077 at commit
[`12f3e3a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10112#issuecomment-161556223
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9756#discussion_r46525752
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/LinearDataGenerator.scala ---
@@ -131,35 +131,30 @@ object LinearDataGenerator {
eps: Dou
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10095#issuecomment-161554438
Merged to master/1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161553604
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161553605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161553502
**[Test build #47129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47129/consoleFull)**
for PR 10092 at commit
[`fef7ada`](https://g
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10077#issuecomment-161553258
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8534#issuecomment-161548934
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#discussion_r46523622
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -623,6 +623,10 @@ setGeneric("getItem", function(x, ...) {
standardGeneric("getItem") })
#' @rdname column
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161548162
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161548165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161548060
**[Test build #47125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47125/consoleFull)**
for PR 10092 at commit
[`014a3a8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547681
**[Test build #47120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47120/consoleFull)**
for PR 10120 at commit
[`c8fc2ec`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10121#issuecomment-161547029
@microwishing can you have a look at the rest of the doc around this for
any other typos? even small PRs have nonzero overhead, so I'm encouraging
people to not just ope
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-161546895
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161546939
**[Test build #47129 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47129/consoleFull)**
for PR 10092 at commit
[`fef7ada`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161546785
**[Test build #47128 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47128/consoleFull)**
for PR 10124 at commit
[`a66723e`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-161546768
@kevinyu98 please write a meaningful title and description.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
---
If your project is set up for
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#discussion_r46522595
--- Diff: python/pyspark/storagelevel.py ---
@@ -49,12 +51,8 @@ def __str__(self):
StorageLevel.DISK_ONLY = StorageLevel(True, False, False, Fal
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10100#issuecomment-161546102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user kevinyu98 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125
Working on spark 11827
Hello : Can you help check this PR? I am adding support for the
java.math.BigInteger for java bean code path. I saw internally spark is
converting the BigInteger to BigDec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10100#issuecomment-161545982
**[Test build #47122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47122/consoleFull)**
for PR 10100 at commit
[`56c250e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10100#issuecomment-161546106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161545743
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161545748
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161545661
**[Test build #47127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47127/consoleFull)**
for PR 10037 at commit
[`3ee7d5c`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10043#issuecomment-161545561
@yhuai as an aside I moderately prefer not to introduce flags merely for
the sake of being conservative or flexible. It rarely achieves that goal, just
introduces comple
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161545580
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161545237
+1 @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#discussion_r46522204
--- Diff: python/pyspark/storagelevel.py ---
@@ -49,12 +51,8 @@ def __str__(self):
StorageLevel.DISK_ONLY = StorageLevel(True, False, False, False)
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161545059
@zsxwing Please take a look. Most of the change is in indentation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
501 - 541 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
