Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167045790
@HyukjinKwon Anyway, I added a test by reflecting this discussion. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10467#issuecomment-167047758
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9350#issuecomment-167056743
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#discussion_r48399567
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -200,6 +204,10 @@ case class TakeOrderedAndProject(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167060213
**[Test build #48293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48293/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10402#issuecomment-167060193
**[Test build #48294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48294/consoleFull)**
for PR 10402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468#issuecomment-167061262
**[Test build #48297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48297/consoleFull)**
for PR 10468 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167063848
**[Test build #48290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48290/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446
[SPARK-12481] [CORE] [STREAMING] [SQL] Remove usage of Hadoop deprecated
APIs and reflection that supported 1.x
Remove use of deprecated Hadoop APIs now that 2.2+ is required
You can merge this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#issuecomment-166881220
I'm going to go ahead and merge this today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user echoTomei opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10447
[SPARK-12396][Core] Modify the function scheduleAtFixedRate to schedule.
Instead of just cancel the registrationRetryTimer to avoid driver retry
connect to master, change the function to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166881444
**[Test build #48239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48239/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10447#issuecomment-166881505
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166884922
**[Test build #48240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48240/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-166888108
**[Test build #48241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48241/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166888672
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166888673
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166888644
**[Test build #48240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48240/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48342878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-166860512
Just realized that [one of the common factor elimination rules][1] defined
in `BooleanSimplification` actually reverts CNF normalization, thus we may
never reach
Github user jaceklaskowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166845081
**[Test build #48234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48234/consoleFull)**
for PR 10411 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#discussion_r48331968
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -583,6 +583,12 @@ object BooleanSimplification
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-166844885
Made a draft PR #10444 based on the idea described in [another comment of
mine][1] above to workaround exponential expansion issue of CNF normalization.
[1]:
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#discussion_r48331134
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -464,6 +465,24 @@ object OptimizeIn extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166843689
**[Test build #48233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48233/consoleFull)**
for PR 10443 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166843816
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166843817
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444
[SPARK-6624][WIP] Another alternative version of CNF normalization
This PR is a draft version of another alternative of CNF normalization
based on [comment][1] in PR #8200. This PR doesn't
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166845460
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#discussion_r48332063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +48,34 @@ trait Predicate extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166845465
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166831471
**[Test build #48233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48233/consoleFull)**
for PR 10443 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166834382
**[Test build #48234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48234/consoleFull)**
for PR 10411 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#discussion_r48328448
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -464,6 +465,24 @@ object OptimizeIn extends
401 - 437 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
