Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338507
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167354765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167354768
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48446551
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -174,4 +175,33 @@ class OrcSourceSuite extends OrcSuite {
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10481#issuecomment-167330045
Thanks @saurfang for the PR. I think this is a good enough fix as this is
in an internal implementation detail and not visible to SparkR users ?
cc @sun-rui
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338499
**[Test build #48346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48346/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484
[SPARK-12520] [PySpark] [1.5] Ensure the join type is `inner` for
equi-Join.
This PR is to add `assert` to ensure the join type is `inner` for
equi-Join.
JIRA:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167352929
@davies @JoshRosen Could you check if this PR is appropriate? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167353434
[Test build #48347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48347/consoleFull)
for PR 10484 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167354602
[Test build #48347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48347/console)
for PR 10484 at commit
Github user ted-yu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167320980
**[Test build #48344 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48344/consoleFull)**
for PR 10377 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167328998
**[Test build #48346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48346/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9911#discussion_r48445836
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientInterface.scala
---
@@ -189,4 +191,6 @@ private[hive] trait ClientInterface {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167329447
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167329445
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9911#issuecomment-167294826
@liancheng I use your code and build. Then run "sbin/start-thriftserver.sh"
failed. the error info is as fellow:
15/12/26 16:28:27 INFO ClientWrapper: Loaded
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10482#issuecomment-167294802
Hey @ted-yu, I think this duplicates #10479, my own PR for this issue. Also
note that this is not a release-blocker since it's not a regression.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10483#issuecomment-167297486
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10482#issuecomment-167309902
I noticed the Jenkins sbt build jobs against Scala 2.11 were recreated
yesterday.
Do you know when the previous 'SPARK-branch-1.5-COMPILE-SBT-SCALA-2.11'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167321193
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167321196
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user saurfang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10481#issuecomment-167376718
Indeed. Like I said I don't see compelling reason to use these three
functions in vectorized way. Let me know if you have any other comments on the
fix.
---
If
GitHub user ErlangZ opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10485
Branch 1.2
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/spark branch-1.2
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451909
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451916
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451915
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451911
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451918
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
GitHub user wilson8 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10486
[SPARK-11460][SQL]Add ExpressionDescription to aggregate functions
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10486#issuecomment-167386674
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10486#issuecomment-167391678
In order to linking this PR to JIRA correctly, you should change title to
`[SPARK-12460] ...` rather than `11460`. It is also better to change commit
title
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10485#issuecomment-167378865
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48451947
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -107,7 +135,7 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
isPublic: Boolean
35 matches
Mail list logo
