Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167399270
**[Test build #48351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48351/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167399420
**[Test build #48352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48352/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167401548
**[Test build #48348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48348/consoleFull)**
for PR 10488 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167401573
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167401572
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403074
**[Test build #48352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48352/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167403081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403091
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167403063
**[Test build #48351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48351/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167403080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403090
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10310#issuecomment-167393002
@srowen I have new another pull request. This pull request will be closed.
another pull request https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10487
---
If your project is
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488
[SPARK-12530][Build] Fix build break at Spark-Master-Maven-Snapshots from
#1293
Compilation error caused due to string concatenations that are not a
constant
Use raw string literal to avoid
GitHub user QiangCai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10487
[SPARK-12340][SQL]fix Int overflow in the SparkPlan.executeTake, RDD.take
and AsyncRDDActions.takeAsync
@srowen I new this pull request to to resolve the problem.
another pull request
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10487#issuecomment-167393041
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user QiangCai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10310
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167395236
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396600
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396598
**[Test build #48349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48349/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167396615
**[Test build #48348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48348/consoleFull)**
for PR 10488 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396601
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396554
**[Test build #48349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48349/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396643
**[Test build #48350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48350/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396684
**[Test build #48350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48350/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396686
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396685
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user vectorijk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489
[SPARK-12461] [SQL] Add ExpressionDescription to math functions
cc @yhuai
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vectorijk/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10487#issuecomment-167436105
**[Test build #2256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2256/consoleFull)**
for PR 10487 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48458317
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiverSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,7 +222,7 @@ class HeartbeatReceiverSuite
} else {
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167418794
Thanks for letting me know them. I will check them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user saucam commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167422237
Hey @marmbrus sorry for the delay in this update, I have added the same
thing to the planner. Also rebased to latest master. How does it look now ?
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167423222
**[Test build #48353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48353/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10490#issuecomment-167436825
**[Test build #48355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48355/consoleFull)**
for PR 10490 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167432879
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167432877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167426083
**[Test build #48354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48354/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10485#issuecomment-167431807
@ErlangZ please close this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167437583
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167424111
@hvanhovell, a set of following two conditions causes this compilation
failure:
1. Use more than one string concatenations
2. Use scala 2.11 compiler (open
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10483#issuecomment-167431974
**[Test build #2257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10483 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10490
[SPARK-12532] [SQL] Join-key Pushdown via Predicate Transitivity
More predicates in join conditions/filters can be pushed down via predicate
transitivity. More predicate pushdown could greatly
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167423751
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167423743
**[Test build #48353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48353/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167423754
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10483#issuecomment-167431912
**[Test build #2257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10483 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10483#issuecomment-167431844
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10490#issuecomment-167440556
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10490#issuecomment-167440555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10490#issuecomment-167440524
**[Test build #48355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48355/consoleFull)**
for PR 10490 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10487#issuecomment-167426345
**[Test build #2256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2256/consoleFull)**
for PR 10487 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-167432837
**[Test build #48354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48354/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488#issuecomment-167418258
There a quite a few builds passing which are using string concatenation in
combination with ```ExpressionDescription```:
Github user tribbloid commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r48460773
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/UnserializableDriverHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tribbloid commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r48460762
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/UnserializableDriverHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171#issuecomment-167463955
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171#issuecomment-167463702
**[Test build #48357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48357/consoleFull)**
for PR 10171 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491
[SPARK-12534][DOC] update documentation to list command line equivalent to
properties
Several Spark properties equivalent to Spark submit command line options
are missing.
You can merge
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167469968
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167469970
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464#issuecomment-167469967
No, you don't. It's OK to have 2 commits. There's a duplication
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167469966
**[Test build #48359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48359/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491#issuecomment-167473135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491#issuecomment-167473131
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-167480578
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167480572
**[Test build #48360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48360/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user tribbloid closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tribbloid commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#issuecomment-167461046
All issues should be fixed by now, submitting final pull request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user tribbloid reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785
[Spark-10625] [SQL] Spark SQL JDBC read/write is unable to handle JDBC
Drivers that adds unserializable objects into connection properties
Connection properties are now deep copied before they
Github user microhello commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10442#discussion_r48463834
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -99,14 +99,14 @@
sql/hive
unsafe
assembly
-external/twitter
-external/flume
-
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10420#discussion_r48458564
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/ParseDriver.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tribbloid commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r48460893
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -75,6 +78,16 @@ private[sql] object
Github user BrianLondon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10416#issuecomment-167480524
@srowen I can't close this because I didn't open it, but there's an
explicit dependency removal PR at #10492
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10420#discussion_r48458578
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/ParseDriver.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167447980
**[Test build #48356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10420#discussion_r48458597
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/ParseDriver.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tribbloid commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r48460878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/UnserializableDriverHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491#issuecomment-167472857
**[Test build #48358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48358/consoleFull)**
for PR 10491 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452730
**[Test build #48356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171#issuecomment-167462209
**[Test build #48357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48357/consoleFull)**
for PR 10171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171#issuecomment-167463954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167469462
**[Test build #48359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48359/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491#issuecomment-167469480
**[Test build #48358 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48358/consoleFull)**
for PR 10491 at commit
GitHub user BrianLondon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492
[SPARK-12453][Streaming] Remove explicit dependency on aws-java-sdk
Successfully ran kinesis demo on a live, aws hosted kinesis stream against
master and 1.6 branches. For reasons I don't
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-167486919
Instead of just omitting the dependency, what about marking it as provided?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167492190
**[Test build #48360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48360/consoleFull)**
for PR 10489 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167492234
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10489#issuecomment-167492235
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#discussion_r48464673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -87,18 +87,21 @@ object Cast {
private def
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167497951
LGTM, merging into master and 1.6 (for doc). I think it's fine to not fix
1.5 branch, until some one hit it, because we may not have a new release for
1.5 branch.
---
Github user Cazen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user Cazen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10493
Add json property(ALLOW_BACKSLASH_ESCAPING_ANY_CHARACTER)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Cazen/spark testCazen
Alternatively
Github user microhello commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10442#issuecomment-167493888
@srowen
When I use [facebook/swift](https://github.com/facebook/swift) with spark
1.5.2, throw following exception, so I need add
Github user saeedehA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1658#issuecomment-167496362
Hello
I'm sorry that I'm beginner in pyspark, but need to get .bin file as byte
array and I don't understand anything about what I must do, is it possible that
say
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167506415
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167506376
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10484#issuecomment-167498565
LGTM, merging into 1.5 branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
