Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170721699
**[Test build #49186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49186/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`4efc0f0`](https://gith
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49391345
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -38,13 +38,120 @@
from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader,
JavaSave
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10627#issuecomment-170717118
LGTM
Merging with master, and will try to backport to 1.4+
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-170715008
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks for the PR!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707#issuecomment-170714223
Tested example locally, and it worked
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170714313
**[Test build #49184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49184/consoleFull)**
for PR 10649 at commit
[`81588d2`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170714040
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170714042
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170713843
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704#issuecomment-170713775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170713845
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704#issuecomment-170713774
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49389929
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -38,13 +38,120 @@
from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader,
JavaSa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170713469
**[Test build #49185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
[`3a69790`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170713648
**[Test build #49165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49165/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
[`8e2f68b`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704#issuecomment-170713355
**[Test build #49166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49166/consoleFull)**
for PR 10704 at commit
[`e99b34a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170712550
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170712548
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10216#issuecomment-170712382
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10216#issuecomment-170712385
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10216#issuecomment-170712103
**[Test build #49176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49176/consoleFull)**
for PR 10216 at commit
[`7aecb59`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711333
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711143
**[Test build #49167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49167/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
[`7265784`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170710926
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170709112
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170710756
**[Test build #49177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10085 at commit
[`798798c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170710921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170710543
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170710545
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708#issuecomment-170709905
Thanks, merging to master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170709769
@cloud-fan can you also take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170709115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170709106
**[Test build #49178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49178/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`6743e93`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709#issuecomment-170708917
**[Test build #49175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49175/consoleFull)**
for PR 10709 at commit
[`05aa93c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170708503
**[Test build #49178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49178/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`6743e93`](https://gith
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170707667
I can reproduce the problem using a simple query now:
```
select area, rank() over (partition by area order by month) as c1
from windowData group by produc
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10216#issuecomment-170707227
**[Test build #49176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49176/consoleFull)**
for PR 10216 at commit
[`7aecb59`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#discussion_r49386798
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQl.scala ---
@@ -41,16 +47,9 @@ private[sql] class CatalystQl(val conf: ParserConf =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170707177
**[Test build #49181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
[`c902d93`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170706592
**[Test build #49177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10085 at commit
[`798798c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706406
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706402
**[Test build #49179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49179/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`9525283`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170705990
**[Test build #49179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49179/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`9525283`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10710#issuecomment-170705375
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705382
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705376
**[Test build #49174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49174/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
[`0f17577`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user abehrens opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10710
[pyspark] adding disjunction and difference functions for rdds
I was looking for a way to perform disjunction and difference operations,
in other words:
* disjunction: find all elements N
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170704868
**[Test build #49173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49173/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`174b40f`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709#issuecomment-170703734
/cc @srowen @ijuma, I finally got around to this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709
[SPARK-9383][PROJECT-INFRA] PR merge script should reset back to previous
branch when possible
This patch modifies our PR merge script to reset back to a named branch
when restoring the original
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170703468
**[Test build #49174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49174/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
[`0f17577`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170703108
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170703109
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170703104
**[Test build #49172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49172/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`7ae30e1`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170702556
**[Test build #49172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49172/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`7ae30e1`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708#issuecomment-170701379
Ping @rxin @marmbrus @pwendell , it looks like this was documented in the
1.6 release notes page but it didn't make it into the SQL Programming Guide:
https://spark.a
Github user huaxingao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10262#issuecomment-170701187
@yhuai
Sorry for the late reply. I waited for my coworker Luciano to come back
from vacation today to check with him about his DB2 docker test status. He has
a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708#issuecomment-170700955
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170700919
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700788
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707#issuecomment-170700519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700549
**[Test build #49164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49164/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user blbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708#issuecomment-170700621
This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project
under the project's open source license.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707#issuecomment-170700521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707#issuecomment-170700309
**[Test build #49171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49171/consoleFull)**
for PR 10707 at commit
[`d5d1343`](https://g
GitHub user blbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708
[SPARK-12758] [SQL] add note to Spark SQL Migration guide about
TimestampType casting
Warning users about casting changes.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49382888
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+package org.apache.spark.sql.e
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170696776
> PY4J zip packaging and source diffs look good to me, so I think this is
good-to-go pending tests.
This is not ready for merging. I plan to revert our workarou
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170696906
**[Test build #49170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49170/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10668#issuecomment-170695889
@tgravescs I can put together an implementation of that to compare to, I
don't know which would look better though, The stages summary doesn't have the
same fields as
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707
[SPARK-12703][MLLIB][DOC][PYTHON] Fixed pyspark.mllib.clustering.KMeans
user guide example
Fixed WSSSE computeCost in Python mllib KMeans user guide example by using
new computeCost method API i
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10707#issuecomment-170694546
**[Test build #49171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49171/consoleFull)**
for PR 10707 at commit
[`d5d1343`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#issuecomment-170694168
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170694122
PY4J zip packaging and source diffs look good to me, so I think this is
good-to-go pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#issuecomment-170694166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170691919
Yeah! I just read the implementation of `Limit`. As you said, the current
one is not highly efficient, especially when the number of limits is not small.
---
If yo
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170691831
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170690104
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170690101
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#issuecomment-170688749
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#issuecomment-170688753
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#issuecomment-170688430
**[Test build #49162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49162/consoleFull)**
for PR 10694 at commit
[`74205dc`](https://g
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#discussion_r49377643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704#issuecomment-170687115
Going to merge this now (I SSH'd into the worker running this test and
verified that the duplicated JAR wasn't generated).
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49377063
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+package org.apache.spark.sql.e
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49376808
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+package org.apache.spark.sql.e
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49376643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49376528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170685818
By the way, I packed py4j-0.9.1-src.zip by myself since I could not find it
anywhere.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706
[SPARK-12543] [SQL] [WIP] Subquery in expression
This PR brings subquery for expression (use subquery as an expression
inside SELECT/WHERE/HAVING), for example:
```
select (select 1)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170685124
**[Test build #49167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49167/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
[`7265784`](https://gi
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49376182
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
301 - 400 of 749 matches
Mail list logo
