Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190522408
Alright, took another shot at addressing the correctness issue. Will
address other comments after tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#issuecomment-190522461
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#issuecomment-190522465
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#issuecomment-190522453
**[Test build #52211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52211/consoleFull)**
for PR 11136 at commit
GitHub user jeanlyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11440
[SPARK-13586]add config to skip generate down time batch when restart
StreamingContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The patch try to add a config
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#issuecomment-190520555
**[Test build #52211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52211/consoleFull)**
for PR 11136 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54518547
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user zuowang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11420#issuecomment-190519404
What would be the case like in CSV? I don't think anybody want to conbine
"user" and "User" column when "caseSensitiveAnalysis" is false.
`scala> val jsonDF =
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11391#discussion_r54517293
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java
---
@@ -765,6 +765,9 @@ private void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190507434
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190507431
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-190507332
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190507323
**[Test build #52207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52207/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11411#issuecomment-190507307
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190500180
There's one corner-case which this patch doesn't handle correctly: if we
are trying to cache a block, start unrolling the iterator, and then conclude
that the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9483#issuecomment-190497524
**[Test build #52210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52210/consoleFull)**
for PR 9483 at commit
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9483#issuecomment-190497155
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-190493809
Will send a simpler version that just use RDD.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190487647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190487649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190487554
**[Test build #52209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52209/consoleFull)**
for PR 11417 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-190486901
@sethah GaussianMixture is a kind of clustering algorithm, not
classification.
And ProbabilisticClassifier extend Predictor, so it has a "setLabelCol"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190486545
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190486542
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190486478
**[Test build #52208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52208/consoleFull)**
for PR 11417 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#issuecomment-190485958
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#issuecomment-190485953
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#issuecomment-190485102
**[Test build #52204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52204/consoleFull)**
for PR 11439 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11428#issuecomment-190484554
@srowen this is the first java example for ml.clustering.BisectingKMeans
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190483710
Hi, @srowen .
I've test more, but found that `-Ywarn-unused-import` option is not
reliable yet in Scala 2.11.7.
Please refer
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190483330
**[Test build #52209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52209/consoleFull)**
for PR 11417 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190481661
@yhuai @nongli Had update the doc string of innerChildren and treeChildren
to include a example.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11417#issuecomment-190481457
**[Test build #52208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52208/consoleFull)**
for PR 11417 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190479973
**[Test build #52207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52207/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190477588
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190477587
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190477582
**[Test build #52206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52206/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190477384
**[Test build #52206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52206/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#issuecomment-190477077
I made one pass on the tests, only some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508437
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508443
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508387
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508365
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508381
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508392
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508370
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54508383
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11423#issuecomment-190476768
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11423#issuecomment-190476770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11423#issuecomment-190476600
**[Test build #52201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11423 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#issuecomment-190475702
This looks like a great candidate to add integration tests for in the
mesos-spark-integration-tests suite. Ideally we have something long running
that we can run.
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190475570
Oh, I see. Then, this PR will not enforce automatically, just helps
developers to check before pushing PR.
Thank you, @zsxwing !
---
If your project is
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190474729
@dongjoon-hyun I mean `lint-java` will fail on a clean machine without
maven cache. It will fail to resolve the snapshot jars which requires running
`mvn install` to
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#discussion_r54507553
--- Diff:
network/shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/mesos/MesosExternalShuffleClient.java
---
@@ -53,21 +65,58 @@ public
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190473820
@srowen , for the scala code, should we take advantage of
`-Ywarn-unused-import` option for that in some way?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190473494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190473496
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190473490
**[Test build #52205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52205/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190473353
Oh, thank you for informing that, @zsxwing .
By the way, `dev\lint-java` does not depend on `mvn install`. I think It
depends on compiled classes.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190473204
**[Test build #52205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52205/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#discussion_r54506572
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosExternalShuffleService.scala
---
@@ -93,7 +113,8 @@ private[mesos] class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#discussion_r54506474
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/config/ConfigBuilder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190472337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190472334
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190472125
**[Test build #52200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52200/consoleFull)**
for PR 11436 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#discussion_r54505940
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/config/ConfigBuilder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#issuecomment-190469440
much simpler!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#discussion_r54505311
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -648,6 +647,32 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11436#discussion_r54504911
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockInfoManager.scala ---
@@ -307,29 +307,48 @@ private[storage] class BlockInfoManager extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#discussion_r54504477
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/config/ConfigBuilder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190463862
FYI because `mvn checkstyle:check` depends on `mvn install` which cost huge
time for `sbt`, java style checker is disabled now:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190463372
Hi, @srowen .
Surprisingly, according to the [ScalaStyle
Ruleset](http://www.scalastyle.org/rules-0.8.0.html) , it seems that we can not
do that for Scala
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#discussion_r54502037
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/config/ConfigBuilder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-190456287
> , can you update the description to make it more accurately reflect what
this is about?
I removed the parts talking about SQL, but the remaining parts talk
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190455685
Thank you, @srowen !
Up to know, I'm not sure about enforcing Scala Imports but I'll check that,
too.
I'll leave a message soon.
By the way,
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#discussion_r54501420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/ContinuousQueryManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -83,7 +98,7 @@ class ContinuousQueryManagerSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#discussion_r54501380
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/log4j.properties ---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ log4j.appender.CA=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439#issuecomment-190455315
**[Test build #52204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52204/consoleFull)**
for PR 11439 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11439
[SPARK-13584][SQL][Tests]Make ContinuousQueryManagerSuite not output logs
to the console
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make ContinuousQueryManagerSuite not output
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-190455028
@vanzin if you don't want to decouple the pr, can you update the
description to make it more accurately reflect what this is about? A big part
of this is not really about
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11435#issuecomment-190454929
**[Test build #2592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2592/consoleFull)**
for PR 11435 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#discussion_r54501087
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/config/ConfigBuilder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190454412
**[Test build #52203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52203/consoleFull)**
for PR 11438 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190453820
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190452909
I'm OK with this. Can we enforce this in Scala too?
Since we've bothered to fail the build if imports aren't in the right order
I think it's reasonable to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438#issuecomment-190452433
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438
[SPARK-13583][BUILD] Enforce `UnusedImports` Java checkstyle rule
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-6990, `dev/lint-java` keeps Java code healthy and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190446124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190446110
**[Test build #52202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52202/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190446127
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190445236
**[Test build #52202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52202/consoleFull)**
for PR 11437 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437#issuecomment-190444065
cc @nongli
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11437
[SPARK-13582] [SQL] defer dictionary decoding in parquet reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR defer the resolution from a id of dictionary to value until the
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6#issuecomment-190443262
@keypointt It's OK to have different examples codes. Let me check it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11423#issuecomment-190442571
**[Test build #52201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11423 at commit
Github user andrewor14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11435#issuecomment-190439315
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11435#issuecomment-190439316
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11435#issuecomment-190439119
**[Test build #52199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52199/consoleFull)**
for PR 11435 at commit
101 - 200 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
