GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667
[SPARK-13139][SQL] Follow-ups to #11573
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Addressing outstanding comments in #11573.
## How was this patch tested?
Jen
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55907029
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -100,48 +92,136 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
*/
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195607575
Any intuition of what caused things to fail?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55906595
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -100,48 +92,136 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195606943
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55906584
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -100,48 +92,136 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
*/
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55906566
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -717,8 +717,13 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
level: Sto
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195606944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55906570
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -793,7 +798,12 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// We wi
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55906575
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -520,3 +447,42 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
logMemo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195606806
**[Test build #52954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52954/consoleFull)**
for PR 11649 at commit
[`baa2cda`](https://g
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-195606384
**[Test build #52966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52966/consoleFull)**
for PR 11514 at commit
[`b3d2df0`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195606637
My bad. I'll close this PR now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11660#issuecomment-195606382
**[Test build #52965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52965/consoleFull)**
for PR 11660 at commit
[`83c1b96`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195606313
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195606316
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#issuecomment-195606355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#issuecomment-195606238
**[Test build #52961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52961/consoleFull)**
for PR 11543 at commit
[`9c7bc31`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#issuecomment-195606353
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195606129
**[Test build #52950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52950/consoleFull)**
for PR 11659 at commit
[`142b43e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11666#issuecomment-195605496
**[Test build #52964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52964/consoleFull)**
for PR 11666 at commit
[`b7393ff`](https://gi
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195604878
looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#discussion_r55905764
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2014,8 +2014,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
} catch
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195604813
Merged into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-195604670
**[Test build #52963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52963/consoleFull)**
for PR 11665 at commit
[`308e93c`](https://gi
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11666
[SPARK-XX] [SQL] avoid the copy in HashedRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid the copy in HashedRelation, since most of the HashedRelation are
built with Array
Github user vanzin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#issuecomment-195604633
Closing for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195604553
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195604555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195604349
**[Test build #52948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52948/consoleFull)**
for PR 11644 at commit
[`8177e69`](https://g
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665
[SPARK-][SQL] Support for inferring filters from data constraints
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**[I'll link it to the JIRA once ASF JIRA is back online]**
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195604399
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195604242
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195604240
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195604040
**[Test build #52949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52949/consoleFull)**
for PR 11615 at commit
[`e772aed`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55905361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exte
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#issuecomment-195603737
end of month I think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#discussion_r55905171
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2082,23 +2082,6 @@
maven-deploy-plugin
2.8.2
-
- org.apache.mave
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#discussion_r55905100
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2082,23 +2082,6 @@
maven-deploy-plugin
2.8.2
-
- org.apache.mave
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-195603471
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195603451
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-195603467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-195603328
**[Test build #52960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52960/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
[`40b00dd`](https://g
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#discussion_r55904943
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2082,23 +2082,6 @@
maven-deploy-plugin
2.8.2
-
- org.apache.m
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664#issuecomment-195602888
**[Test build #52962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52962/consoleFull)**
for PR 11664 at commit
[`ac1a40b`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11660#discussion_r55904776
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -944,6 +896,85 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11582#issuecomment-195602622
@wangmiao1981 I closed my PR. I have made the changes to add persistence to
only LogisticRegression and Naive Bayes. Would you like to review? We could
then send
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664#issuecomment-195602213
cc @nongli @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664
[SPARK-XX] [SQL] fast serialization for collecting DataFrame/Dataset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we call DataFrame/Dataset.collect(), Java serializer (or Kryo
S
Github user GayathriMurali closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11552
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#issuecomment-195601990
**[Test build #52961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52961/consoleFull)**
for PR 11543 at commit
[`9c7bc31`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#discussion_r55904257
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -932,6 +933,33 @@ object PushPredicateThroughGenerat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195600654
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195600655
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195600102
**[Test build #52947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52947/consoleFull)**
for PR 11498 at commit
[`9fdde9f`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#discussion_r55903824
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -932,6 +933,33 @@ object PushPredicateThroughGenerat
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#discussion_r55903702
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -932,6 +933,33 @@ object PushPredicateThroughGenerat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-195599201
**[Test build #52960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52960/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
[`40b00dd`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#discussion_r55903571
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/dsl/package.scala ---
@@ -268,7 +268,14 @@ package object dsl {
Aggregate
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663
[SPARK-13068][PYSPARK][ML] Type conversion for Pyspark params
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds type conversion functionality for parameters in Pyspark. A
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#discussion_r55903553
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -932,6 +933,33 @@ object PushPredicateThroughGenerat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#issuecomment-195597743
OK. Let's merge this first (to avoid it has conflicts caused by other
commits ). We can address the comments in a follow-up PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#discussion_r55902999
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -64,10 +83,86 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
SimplePar
Github user sethah closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11099
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11099#issuecomment-195596930
I'm closing this PR and opening a new one to reflect the changes discussed
on the Jira.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-195596524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-195596522
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-195596349
**[Test build #52943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52943/consoleFull)**
for PR 11591 at commit
[`79e1bf5`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195595877
**[Test build #52959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52959/consoleFull)**
for PR 11452 at commit
[`fda639b`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195595600
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#issuecomment-195595365
**[Test build #52957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52957/consoleFull)**
for PR 11662 at commit
[`4996125`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#issuecomment-195595381
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#issuecomment-195595377
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195593598
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662#issuecomment-195594084
**[Test build #52957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52957/consoleFull)**
for PR 11662 at commit
[`4996125`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195593967
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195593603
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195593973
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195594081
**[Test build #52958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52958/consoleFull)**
for PR 11649 at commit
[`55155a7`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195593458
**[Test build #52945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52945/consoleFull)**
for PR 11498 at commit
[`c04d3d7`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195593457
**[Test build #52955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52955/consoleFull)**
for PR 11661 at commit
[`e3e62ba`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#issuecomment-195592073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#issuecomment-195592211
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#issuecomment-195592071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#issuecomment-195592207
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195592066
**[Test build #52956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52956/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
[`c5a23a4`](https://gi
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11662
[minor][build][test-maven] Remove invocation of dependency plugin.
This avoids noisy output in maven builds, where the classpath of
each module would be printed to the terminal.
This was
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#issuecomment-195591798
**[Test build #52946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52946/consoleFull)**
for PR 11646 at commit
[`35be8d5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195591761
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195591764
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195591625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195591622
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#issuecomment-195591633
**[Test build #52937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52937/consoleFull)**
for PR 11573 at commit
[`bd91b0f`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55900897
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -520,3 +447,42 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
logMem
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11498#issuecomment-195591564
**[Test build #52944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52944/consoleFull)**
for PR 11498 at commit
[`8b8f4cb`](https://g
201 - 300 of 606 matches
Mail list logo
