Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-198032510
**[Test build #53452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53452/consoleFull)**
for PR 11748 at commit
[`cb9311b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-198045638
**[Test build #53457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53457/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`9e812c6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-197602624
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-197404951
@kiszk Feel free to change that API
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11620#issuecomment-197556658
Thanks for the updates. Still some indentation issues, but that's it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11755#issuecomment-197620559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11784
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-198270501
It would also be ideal to create a test case that can replicate the issue
with the old code, and pass with the new code, for regression testing going
forward.
---
If y
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#discussion_r56432616
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/UnionRDD.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +64,21 @@ class UnionRDD[T: ClassTag](
var rdds: Seq[RDD[T]])
ex
Github user rdblue commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#issuecomment-198034848
@dbtsai, I updated the PR with your suggestion and rebased on master.
Thanks for taking the time to review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-198050196
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788#issuecomment-197995219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11750#discussion_r56442370
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,469 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-197665908
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#discussion_r56587656
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -151,6 +151,209 @@ def intercept(self):
"""
return self._call_java("intercept")
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56387539
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11834
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788#issuecomment-198010606
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11807#issuecomment-198638916
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-198416483
**[Test build #2651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2651/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
[`c5d0bcf`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11817#issuecomment-198259626
**[Test build #53526 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53526/consoleFull)**
for PR 11817 at commit
[`4076488`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-198085859
**[Test build #53469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53469/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`e04a98c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11838#issuecomment-198589634
**[Test build #53586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53586/consoleFull)**
for PR 11838 at commit
[`fb7e08f`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11741#issuecomment-198102777
**[Test build #53465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53465/consoleFull)**
for PR 11741 at commit
[`81c6a47`](https://g
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#discussion_r56464958
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/JavaStreamingTestExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11818#issuecomment-198268014
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9474#issuecomment-197619393
**[Test build #2649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2649/consoleFull)**
for PR 9474 at commit
[`16e6f64`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11767
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11790#issuecomment-198035803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#issuecomment-197769816
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#discussion_r56744525
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -104,3 +104,32 @@ object BindReferences extends L
Github user rdblue commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11273#issuecomment-197622432
Sorry for the delay, @vanzin and @srowen! I didn't get notified that you
had commented. I've rebased this on master and fixed the PR title.
---
If your project is set u
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#issuecomment-197614696
**[Test build #53372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53372/consoleFull)**
for PR 11709 at commit
[`ed60f3d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8112#issuecomment-197808782
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#issuecomment-198636672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#issuecomment-198464284
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-197661337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11838#issuecomment-198589816
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#discussion_r56744501
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -104,3 +104,32 @@ object BindReferences extends Lo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#issuecomment-198636674
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-197535905
**[Test build #53344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53344/consoleFull)**
for PR 11747 at commit
[`a950ffc`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#issuecomment-198636209
**[Test build #53598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53598/consoleFull)**
for PR 11645 at commit
[`2bd6cbd`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11827#issuecomment-198518938
**[Test build #53556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53556/consoleFull)**
for PR 11827 at commit
[`7effd29`](https://g
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r56595822
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStreamCheckpointData.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ class DStreamCheckpointData[T: C
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197593208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11827#issuecomment-198517461
I did this in earlier pull, but while merging saw them fixed in latest
build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11759#issuecomment-197273768
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11750#discussion_r56393684
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198372501
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11810#issuecomment-198207789
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11789#issuecomment-198009787
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#discussion_r56537624
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +498,41 @@ class Analyzer(
order
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-198012705
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197440406
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197639899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11839
[SPARK-14018][SQL] Use 64-bit num records in BenchmarkWholeStageCodegen
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
500L << 20 is actually pretty close to 32-bit int limit. I was trying to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r56627433
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -118,63 +120,94 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
val proc
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56376088
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197681504
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11830#issuecomment-198540182
**[Test build #53564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53564/consoleFull)**
for PR 11830 at commit
[`4172226`](https://gi
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9884#discussion_r56454473
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormulaSuite.scala ---
@@ -214,4 +215,41 @@ class RFormulaSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLlib
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11744#issuecomment-197379330
Thank you, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788
[SPARK-13977] [SQL] Brings back Shuffled hash join
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ShuffledHashJoin (also outer join) is removed in 1.6, in favor of
SortMergeJoin, which
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10607#issuecomment-198317091
Sure makes sense - it was my impression that the ML impl would be improved
and I assumed part of that may involve using more of DF/DS, hence my
comment
On Thu,
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198111228
cc @nongli
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11238
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11807#issuecomment-198634702
**[Test build #53602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53602/consoleFull)**
for PR 11807 at commit
[`d31bb3f`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11779#issuecomment-197837947
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#discussion_r56744426
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -217,9 +222,16 @@ private[sql] case class DataSourceScan(
//
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r56603906
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,4 +216,12 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends QueryTest
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11758#issuecomment-197718062
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11655#issuecomment-197272701
**[Test build #53315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53315/consoleFull)**
for PR 11655 at commit
[`10f2d1e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197836026
**[Test build #53422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53422/consoleFull)**
for PR 11605 at commit
[`90cf309`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-197581060
**[Test build #53366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53366/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`2690512`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11765#issuecomment-197495717
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11833#issuecomment-198594632
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#discussion_r56744398
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2156,6 +2158,47 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQ
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10231#issuecomment-198502178
**[Test build #53552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53552/consoleFull)**
for PR 10231 at commit
[`a847bc9`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11825#issuecomment-198531414
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11318#issuecomment-197556372
**[Test build #53357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53357/consoleFull)**
for PR 11318 at commit
[`6ebe948`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-197661334
**[Test build #53386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53386/consoleFull)**
for PR 11486 at commit
[`8e21393`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198136599
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#discussion_r56744391
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2156,6 +2158,47 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQL
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#discussion_r56736684
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -104,3 +104,39 @@ object BindReferences extends Lo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11828#issuecomment-198588401
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11777#issuecomment-198222192
This is similar to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618 isn't it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#discussion_r56428091
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +275,140 @@ private[sql] class Defau
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11797#issuecomment-198135799
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11814#issuecomment-198219655
**[Test build #53509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53509/consoleFull)**
for PR 11814 at commit
[`675b2b4`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11722#issuecomment-197279051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11783#issuecomment-197913606
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r56604136
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,4 +216,12 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11750#issuecomment-197620377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11774#issuecomment-197720690
merging in master. this is a great change!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#discussion_r56744357
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -618,9 +622,32 @@ class Analyzer(
* clause. T
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11696#issuecomment-197854633
I'm going to merge it to unblock following works, will address comments of
@yhuai and @liancheng if you have any.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11773#issuecomment-197717578
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56435214
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/StratifiedSamplingExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11761#issuecomment-197281236
**[Test build #53316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53316/consoleFull)**
for PR 11761 at commit
[`a3fd6ff`](https://g
101 - 200 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
