Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11836#discussion_r56755343
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -31,17 +32,34 @@ import
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11836#discussion_r56755267
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -31,17 +32,34 @@ import
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11536#issuecomment-198511013
Get it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11783#issuecomment-197987787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11683#issuecomment-197552521
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13951
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11737#issuecomment-197734353
**[Test build #53394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53394/consoleFull)**
for PR 11737 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11825#issuecomment-198464786
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11740#discussion_r56376958
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -396,7 +401,7 @@ case class WholeStageCodegen(child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11679#issuecomment-197753298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11780#issuecomment-197789313
**[Test build #53416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53416/consoleFull)**
for PR 11780 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788#issuecomment-198026929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788#issuecomment-198032509
**[Test build #53451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53451/consoleFull)**
for PR 11788 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-197636844
@cloud-fan Sorry, one more question. Would it be great if we maybe make
`spark.sql.columnNameOfCorruptRecord` as an option just like the compression
option for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11655#issuecomment-197277636
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56376064
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r56421658
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulable.scala ---
@@ -146,6 +212,32 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] private (
def merge(term: R) { value_
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-197537016
**[Test build #53343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53343/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56376208
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197827396
**[Test build #53421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53421/consoleFull)**
for PR 11605 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#discussion_r56478518
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/JavaStreamingTestExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11749#discussion_r56416653
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -345,15 +358,25 @@ public void setColumn(int ordinal,
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-197456454
thanks, all comments addressed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11724#discussion_r56444849
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -108,14 +109,38 @@ private[csv] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11814#issuecomment-198223965
**[Test build #53512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53512/consoleFull)**
for PR 11814 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11772#issuecomment-197565822
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11777#issuecomment-197769134
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11783#issuecomment-197913025
**[Test build #53430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53430/consoleFull)**
for PR 11783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198109663
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11797#issuecomment-198231936
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11791#issuecomment-198086746
**[Test build #53456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53456/consoleFull)**
for PR 11791 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-198098184
**[Test build #53472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53472/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197827320
Well, already minimized changes, but still too large to display :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11708#issuecomment-197701587
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11832
[SPARK-13963][ML] Adding binary toggle param to HashingTF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding binary toggle parameter to ml.feature.HashingTF, as well as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-197603358
**[Test build #53351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53351/consoleFull)**
for PR 11748 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-198081291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10231#issuecomment-198519918
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770
[SPARK-13942][CORE][DOCS] Remove Shark-related docs and visibility for 2.x
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Shark` was merged into `Spark SQL` since [July
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-197676388
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8112#issuecomment-197808784
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11771#issuecomment-197592218
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198538107
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317#issuecomment-197605244
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197645762
Sorry I missed it as this message is so far away from the final one...
@JoshRosen thanks again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11773
[MINOR][SQL][BUILD] Remove duplicated lines
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes three minor duplicated lines. First one is making the
following
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-198236937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198141927
**[Test build #53477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53477/consoleFull)**
for PR 11799 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197898940
**[Test build #53427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53427/consoleFull)**
for PR 11769 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197875847
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#issuecomment-197671956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11620#discussion_r56418523
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -322,7 +337,8 @@ object
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11836#issuecomment-198572871
@yhuai @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#discussion_r56567647
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -199,7 +210,8 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-198057482
**[Test build #53458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53458/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11754#issuecomment-197457013
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#issuecomment-197773071
Thanks @mengxr @thunterdb @yanboliang for the review. Sent an update:
1. resolve the conflict with GLMSummary.
2. revert the summary statistics related part.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11788#issuecomment-198266969
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197825834
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11791#issuecomment-198218448
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-198239021
**[Test build #53517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53517/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-197457623
**[Test build #53330 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53330/consoleFull)**
for PR 11665 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11737#issuecomment-197734597
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297#issuecomment-197750038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#discussion_r56599894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1450,7 +1450,9 @@ object CleanupAliases extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198597887
**[Test build #53584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53584/consoleFull)**
for PR 11636 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-197586274
**[Test build #53368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53368/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11793#issuecomment-198081241
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#discussion_r56619813
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSampler.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ trait RandomSampler[T, U] extends Pseudorandom with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198142033
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11813#issuecomment-198215415
**[Test build #53505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53505/consoleFull)**
for PR 11813 at commit
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11755#issuecomment-197552094
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197792870
hi @marmbrus , yes your idea makes sense, we should use `Alias` to produce
new attributes if we can. Except leaf nodes, there are some special cases we
still need to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11828#issuecomment-198585992
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#discussion_r56469940
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/JavaStreamingTestExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11817#issuecomment-198296418
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11620#issuecomment-197621807
No problem. Thanks for the PR!
LGTM
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-197623813
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198136602
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11831#issuecomment-198543525
**[Test build #53566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53566/consoleFull)**
for PR 11831 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11794#issuecomment-198534785
**[Test build #53550 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53550/consoleFull)**
for PR 11794 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11723#issuecomment-198300194
**[Test build #53525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53525/consoleFull)**
for PR 11723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197681101
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11809#issuecomment-198209937
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-198552276
**[Test build #53567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53567/consoleFull)**
for PR 11829 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197593028
**[Test build #53370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53370/consoleFull)**
for PR 11770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197700857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-197458671
**[Test build #53331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53331/consoleFull)**
for PR 11665 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11782#issuecomment-198274820
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11761
[Trivial][Docs] Two typos in comment
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
two typos
## How was this patch tested?
no tests
You can merge this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11798#issuecomment-198168724
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10991#issuecomment-197606014
I don't think that the Master should have any event-log consumption logic
whatsoever.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-198217639
**[Test build #53507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53507/consoleFull)**
for PR 11756 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11786#issuecomment-197992472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198585189
**[Test build #53584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53584/consoleFull)**
for PR 11636 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-198009920
**[Test build #53446 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53446/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#issuecomment-197585281
**[Test build #53367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53367/consoleFull)**
for PR 11709 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11755#issuecomment-197718175
Merging in master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11790#issuecomment-198035808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
401 - 500 of 1811 matches
Mail list logo
