Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11807#discussion_r56726804
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2385,7 +2385,31 @@ class RFormula(JavaEstimator, HasFeaturesCol,
HasLabelCol):
|0.0|0.0| a|[0.0,1.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197639831
**[Test build #53383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53383/consoleFull)**
for PR 11764 at commit
[`dfe39c6`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11784#issuecomment-198227764
**[Test build #53514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53514/consoleFull)**
for PR 11784 at commit
[`a89bb5d`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-197618600
**[Test build #53364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53364/consoleFull)**
for PR 11701 at commit
[`0900b13`](https://g
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197826088
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user rdblue closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11814#issuecomment-198220257
**[Test build #53510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53510/consoleFull)**
for PR 11814 at commit
[`f078796`](https://gi
Github user rdblue commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#issuecomment-197591766
@JoshRosen, I've added the test. Sorry for taking so long, my e-mail
notifications weren't getting through for a little while.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11818
[SPARK-14001][SQL] support multi-children Union in SQLBuilder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The fix is simple, use the existing `CombineUnions` rule to combine
adja
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11804#issuecomment-198568970
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56377425
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#discussion_r56576372
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-197460994
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11820#issuecomment-198308364
**[Test build #53531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53531/consoleFull)**
for PR 11820 at commit
[`1a35c8a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-198765038
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-198765035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-198764960
**[Test build #53619 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53619/consoleFull)**
for PR 11747 at commit
[`0b9340d`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#issuecomment-197515559
Waiting for the decision of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11765.
Then, we can know if we should do the same here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9884#discussion_r56428318
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormulaSuite.scala ---
@@ -214,4 +215,41 @@ class RFormulaSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLli
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11755#issuecomment-197576639
**[Test build #53362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53362/consoleFull)**
for PR 11755 at commit
[`45b0c0b`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#issuecomment-198590763
**[Test build #53575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53575/consoleFull)**
for PR 11709 at commit
[`e5725f8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11833#issuecomment-198764034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11833#issuecomment-198764035
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11833#issuecomment-198763890
**[Test build #53618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53618/consoleFull)**
for PR 11833 at commit
[`fcfd697`](https://g
Github user trueyao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11719#issuecomment-197321496
The error of "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed" is
confusing,I just exchange two lines of codes..Actually am I wrong ?
---
If your project is se
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197628053
**[Test build #53381 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53381/consoleFull)**
for PR 11764 at commit
[`6c89f00`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-197667952
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197828887
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-198134876
**[Test build #53480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53480/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
[`b87f2b8`](https://gi
Github user joan38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11772#discussion_r56422280
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -282,7 +282,10 @@ private[ml] object DefaultParamsReader {
*/
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-198152267
**[Test build #53490 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53490/consoleFull)**
for PR 11799 at commit
[`01357e5`](https://gi
Github user skambha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11775#discussion_r56549702
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -237,6 +237,8 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-197378325
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11749#issuecomment-197505322
**[Test build #53338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53338/consoleFull)**
for PR 11749 at commit
[`2d1066f`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11841
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#issuecomment-197905850
@hhbyyh I vote option 3 in JIRA. We already have
```GeneralizedLinearRegression``` in Scala, so it's better to call this
implementation from SparkR directly. Due to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-197583124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#discussion_r56619429
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -618,9 +622,33 @@ class Analyzer(
* clause. T
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198084229
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11825#issuecomment-198463970
**[Test build #53544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53544/consoleFull)**
for PR 11825 at commit
[`a018f38`](https://gi
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#discussion_r56547627
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -65,6 +72,106 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return False
+class TypeConvert
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11819#issuecomment-198410168
This change doesn't match the JIRA issue title and that JIRA may be
outdated since the BlockManager no longer stores or knows the sizes of shuffle
blocks.
---
If yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11806#issuecomment-198162750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11841#issuecomment-198761415
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8112#issuecomment-197850219
@sethah Could you also take a look at #11102 - it is somewhat related. We
should just ensure to sync up between the two ideas.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10839#issuecomment-197743430
**[Test build #53401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53401/consoleFull)**
for PR 10839 at commit
[`c043e77`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11783#issuecomment-198153726
merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197571760
**[Test build #53361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53361/consoleFull)**
for PR 11770 at commit
[`e6707f1`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11836#discussion_r56752770
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveCatalog.scala ---
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ private[spark] class HiveCatalog(client: HiveClient)
exten
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11683
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#issuecomment-198225310
Sorry I didn't have much time. I will think about it too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56435169
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/StratifiedSamplingExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11791
[SPARK-13980][WIP] Incrementally serialize blocks while unrolling them in
MemoryStore
When a block is persisted in the MemoryStore at a serialized storage level,
the current MemoryStore.putItera
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#issuecomment-198572978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#issuecomment-198125996
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197899323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197899144
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11808#issuecomment-198169176
Is this meant to be a PR? Looking at the code, it seems more like a wok
progress.
Mind closing and reopening once its ready?
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#discussion_r56619995
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -532,28 +539,14 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
blas.sgem
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11708#issuecomment-197456137
Looks like there is a real failure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-197585828
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197620311
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11836#issuecomment-198615299
**[Test build #53587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53587/consoleFull)**
for PR 11836 at commit
[`f089e2b`](https://g
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-198032884
GROUP BY position is supported by a few major analytical databases:
Terradata & Netezza
I am not sure if you should even allow the combination of a `SELECT *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11817#issuecomment-198324139
**[Test build #53529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53529/consoleFull)**
for PR 11817 at commit
[`0ee7072`](https://g
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9474#discussion_r56438362
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Impurity.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ private[spark] abstract class ImpurityAggregator(v
Github user latioswang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r56595050
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -118,63 +120,94 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11771#issuecomment-197591142
**[Test build #53371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53371/consoleFull)**
for PR 11771 at commit
[`99df29a`](https://gi
Github user hbhanawat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11723#issuecomment-198313907
@rxin I have completed the changes. Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198372017
**[Test build #53537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53537/consoleFull)**
for PR 11636 at commit
[`a7ac8fb`](https://g
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11842
[MINOR][DOCS] Use `spark-submit` instead of `sparkR` to submit R script.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `sparkR` is not used for submitting R Scripts from S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11817#issuecomment-198414797
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-197803004
Yeah I'm investigating but any ideas are welcome.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11830
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#issuecomment-198245859
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-198045673
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11798#issuecomment-198142164
Note that the PR builder won't actually test this against 2.10, so we'll
still need to check this out and test it ourselves before merge.
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-198013402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11581#issuecomment-197361857
@jkbradley Looks good for me now, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10242#issuecomment-197702857
**[Test build #53395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53395/consoleFull)**
for PR 10242 at commit
[`5d75376`](https://gi
Github user bomeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11789#issuecomment-198117941
Let me figure out the unit tests failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-198228885
**[Test build #53515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53515/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
[`63965bb`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11832#issuecomment-198560043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#issuecomment-197730304
**[Test build #53399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53399/consoleFull)**
for PR 11776 at commit
[`ff56ff5`](https://gi
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-198332302
This didn't cut the relevant doc/streaming-*.md files BTW
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11784
[Minor] [ML] When trainingSummary is None, it should throw RuntimeException.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When trainingSummary is None, it should throw RuntimeException
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11801#issuecomment-198162338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11774
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11784#issuecomment-198234870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11830#issuecomment-198555041
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11815#discussion_r56752455
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -435,6 +435,11 @@ object SQLConf {
defaultValue = Some(true)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11208#issuecomment-198759811
**[Test build #53620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53620/consoleFull)**
for PR 11208 at commit
[`e060dea`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11791#issuecomment-198087062
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9474#discussion_r56438348
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impl/DTStatsAggregator.scala
---
@@ -73,26 +73,31 @@ private[spark] class DTStatsAggregator(
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10991#issuecomment-198003196
Maybe I'm missing something then. Most of the REST API defined in
[ApiRootResource](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9474#issuecomment-197593213
I'll take a look at this now. Sorry for the long delay!
Have you run scaling tests on this to verify the lowered communication? It
would be great to see some
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11536
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#issuecomment-197671947
**[Test build #53388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53388/consoleFull)**
for PR 11645 at commit
[`15e1780`](https://g
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297#discussion_r56426148
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/FromClauseParser.g
---
@@ -91,10 +91,17 @@ fromClause
joinSource
@i
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197763974
**[Test build #53396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53396/consoleFull)**
for PR 11764 at commit
[`0ee9d40`](https://g
601 - 700 of 1792 matches
Mail list logo
